Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Latest Films

1283284285286287289»

Comments

  • se9addick said:
    Just got home from seeing The Substance, a film that’s desperately trying to make a statement of some substance but grotesquely fails.

    I liked the first hour or so before what could have been great science fiction becomes illogical and turns into a horror that’s so absurd that people in the cinema were laughing.

    Here’s a suitable review:

    https://www.miamiartzine.com/Features.php?op=Article_17268292937334
    That’s my issue with the Substance. It’s a good idea (although slightly predictable) and I thought the performances from the leads were good but it drags on far too long. There were a couple of moments about 30-45 mins before the finish when I assumed the film was ending, but no, on it goes with scenes that really add nothing to the story or the “message”. 
    If you look at Rotten Tomatoes 🍅 most of the public say something along the lines of this whereas the critics are largely gushing praise.

    I think this makes a good illustration of the difference between public and critics:
    Is the public looking for entertainment and the critics looking for artistic merit?

    I’m simplifying it somewhat but I see an ever increasing divide. Personally I want a logical storyline that’s believable. This for me is the bones of any book or film. A book then adds the flesh by good writing and a film by good acting and directing.

    The Substance has good acting, directing that looks like 3 different directors have stepped in at different points, and a storyline that makes no sense in an effort to be artistic and clever.
    Not since AI has a film made me feel this annoyance. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!