Be grateful if those at the game could copy and paste the bit below (in that order please) and give your ratings out of ten (half marks allowed):
Elliot -
Richardson -
Dailly -
Sodje -
Youga -
Sam -
Racon -
Bailey -
Burton -
McLeod -
Semedo -
Basey -
Very hard game to mark fairly IMO
0
Comments
Richardson - 7
Dailly - 7
Sodje - 9
Youga - 8
Sam - 7
Racon - 6
Bailey - 6
Burton - 6
McLeod - 6
Semedo - 7
Basey - 8
Richardson - 6
Dailly - 6
Sodje -8
Youga -7
Sam -7
Racon -6
Bailey -6
Burton -5
McLeod -6
Semedo -7
Basey -7
Richardson -7
Dailly -7
Sodje -7.5
Youga -7.5
Sam -7
Racon -7
Bailey -6
Burton -6
McLeod -5
Semedo - 7
Basey -7.5
Richardson 6 usual sound performance until his injury
Dailly 7 did what was required possibly culpable for Jackson's goal though
Sodje 7 as Dailly
Youga 8 the one outfield Charlton player who appeared up for it (until Basey came on anyway)
Sam 6 poor by his standards. Perhaps the injury has caught up with him
Racon 6 Nothing particularly good or bad but not as influential as normal
Bailey 6 nearly got on the end of a cross in the 2nd half but otherwise below his usual par
Burton 6 Can't fault his effort but totally ineffective today
McLeod 6 Doesn't hide but an appalling attempt for his one real chance
Semedo 6 As Racon
Basey 7 looked up for it and effective coming forward. Perhaps fortunate that Fuller appears as slow as he is!
Elliot - 8
Richardson - 6
Dailly - 7
Sodje - 8
Youga - 6
Sam - 5
Racon - 6
Bailey - 5
Burton - 5
McLeod - 6
Semedo - 6
Basey - 7
Richardson - 6
Dailly - 7
Sodje - 7.5
Youga - 7
Sam - 6
Racon - 6
Bailey - 6
Burton - 6
McLeod - 6
Semedo - 8
Basey - 7
Richardson -6
Dailly -7
Sodje -7
Youga -7
Sam -6
Racon -6
Bailey -6
Burton -5
McLeod -6
Semedo - 7
Basey - 5
Richardson - 6.5
Dailly - 6
Sodje - 7.5
Youga - 6.5
Sam - 7
Racon - 7
Bailey - 6
Burton - 4
McLeod - 6
Semedo - 6.5
Basey - 6.5
Richardson -6
Dailly -6
Sodje -6.5
Youga -7
Sam -5
Racon -5
Bailey -5.5
Burton -5
McLeod -5
Semedo - 5.5
Basey - 5.5
Richardson -6 A couple of forraging runs, a couple of unforced errors. Presumably went off injured
Dailly -6.5 Calm and collected, but was a bit caught out for the goal
Sodje -7.5 Inspirational, first to every ball
Youga -7 Less attacking detail this week, but had another effective game
Sam -6 A few decent crosses, but another quiet game for Lloydy
Racon -6 We really struggle when he's not on top form - and he wasn't on top form.
Bailey -6.5 Aside from some terrible dead balls a typically forthwright performance
Burton -4 Can't think of him winning anything against a mean defence. Fluffed a good chance near the end. Due a break
McLeod -6 Tried hard, created one decent chance for himself, but fluffed it.
Semedo - 7 As a Spring supporter I wasn't clamouring for him to be back, but showed his quality today.
Basey - 6 Looked OK when he came on
Mooney 6.5 - The answer to the Deon problem? Looked strong and worked hard to get a cross in.
Waggy SV
Parky 6 - Will he ever switch a wining lineup, if the conditions demand it?
Richardson - 6
Dailly - 6
Sodje - 7
Youga - 7
Sam - 6
Racon - 6
Bailey - 5
Burton - 6
McLeod - 7
Semedo - 6
Basey - 5.5
Mooney - 5.5
Elliot - 7
Richardson - 5
Dailly - 6
Sodje - 6
Youga - 5
Sam - 4
Racon - 4
Bailey - 4
Burton - 3.5
McLeod - 3.5
Semedo - 5
Basey - 6
Richardson - 5
Dailly - 6
Sodje - 7
Youga - 7
Sam - 6
Racon - 7
Bailey - 6
Burton - 5
McLeod - 5
Semedo - 6
Basey - 6
Richardson - 5
Dailly - 5
Sodje - 6
Youga -6
Sam - 5
Racon - 6
Bailey - 5
Burton - 5
McLeod - 5
Semedo - 6
Basey - 6
Richardson - 6
Dailly - 6.5
Sodje - 7.5
Youga - 7
Sam - 5.5
Racon - 6
Bailey - 6
Burton - 4
McLeod - 6
Semedo - 6
Basey - 6.5
Richardson - 7
Dailly - 7
Sodje - 7
Youga - 7
Sam - 6
Racon - 6
Bailey - 6
Burton - 6
McLeod - 6
Semedo - 6
Basey - 7
Richardson - 7
Dailly - 7
Sodje - 8
Youga - 8
Sam - 4
Racon - 4
Bailey - 4
Burton - 4
McLeod - 4
Semedo - 7
Basey - 8
Parky 4 - hasn't really got a clue.
Not every game is a nice, free-flowing affair. Sometimes it is a battle and teams cancel each other out, particularly when the wind is up and a pitch isn't good. It is a real leveller and the leveller is normally at the lowest point. Saturday was a huge potential banana skin, that given how things were i was happy to come away with a point from. We didn't play great in any way, but we done what we had to do to come away with something.
Dread to think what some of the marks would have been had we lost.
I am one of those who has marked players poorly. I don't see the point in doing the ratings unless it's going to be an accurate reflection of the performances of the players. I thought most of our midfield and strikers were below average, therefore had to get less than 5.5/10. Just because they battled hard and ground out the result doesn't mean they played well.
In the light of your comment, AFKA, I took a quick look at your ratings. You gave every defender 7 and every midfielder/attacker 6. Such eveness in our play definitely wasn't the game I saw. Poor conditions, yes. But some adapted to them better than others and that surely should be reflected in the marking?
But it only goes to prove what we knew all along : that we all look at these things quite differently and there is no objective scientific benchmark. Which, of course, is how it should be and is why we do this exercise and why you then aggregate and average out everone's marks to create the statbank !
Well done, though. Must be a lot of work and it's always fascinating to read the disitlled collective wisdom of Lifers when you've finished all your number crunching.
Richardson -5.5
Dailly -7
Sodje -7
Youga -7
Sam -5.5
Racon -6.5
Bailey -6
Burton -6
McLeod -5.5
Semedo - 6.5
Basey - 5.5
No such thing as an "official rating" - only my ratings are correct ;-)
The point I'm making is there isn't a direct link between player ratings and outcome of the game - it's possible to play terribly and win a game, and play really well and lose. My ratings were low even though we got a draw; I would've given the same ratings even if they hadn't got their equaliser or had they gone on to get a winner.
Surely you have to start with the winning formation then change if things don't happen and a 4 for parky was a bit harsh.
we havn't had a winning formula away from home since the end of August so he hardly started with a winning one did he ?
McLeod, although working hard, was having a mare so Mooney should have had longer. Sam was out of sorts, Waggy should have come on earlier. Racon and Bailey especially need a boot up their arse, they are a lot better than they are currently showing and that isn't based on just this game but a previous few others too.
In my view criticising Parky is a bit harsh because to no small extent his hand was forced because of the injury to Richardson.
I reckon Jonjo would have come on for the last half hour had Richardson been able to continue. As it was Youga had to play on his "wrong" side which also meant Sam had to be more mindful of defensive duties given that Barcham is arguably their most dangerous player after Jackson.
Imagine the flak had Parky changed it earlier and we lost!!
Defence looked pretty much altogether apart from that one time but conditions were bad (wind & grass) so can't put too much on Parky's shoulders.
All that AFKA's fault. The bloke's clearly a disruptive anarchist. Admin should have a word with him...;o)