Not a big fan of working out PoM's in this way. Technically then, if Wagstaff came on twice as a sub and put in decent performances, he could win a PoM award from two sub appearances.
I'd go with Youga on a stats basis, though if i was simply asked the question, i'd probably say Richardson.
[cite]Posted By: nigel w[/cite]Youga.
Don' think you can do it purely on points average as there is also the question of consistency, which means there's a 'bonus', if you like, that goes to the player who has managed such a high score over five games as opposed to one who has only done it over three.
[cite]Posted By: AFKA[/cite]Not a big fan of working out PoM's in this way. Technically then, if Wagstaff came on twice as a sub and put in decent performances, he could win a PoM award from two sub appearances.
even though it's points based you don't have to fix the criteria - can exclude players who haven't played much or put them to the vote with the other leading candidate(s)
Comments
I'd go with Youga on a stats basis, though if i was simply asked the question, i'd probably say Richardson.
And we lost to Colchester 3-0
oooo matron...
September (wddwld) - KELLY YOUGA - played 5, average=7.03, total=35.13
Actually a tie with Semedo .... 14 all in the vote-off .... awarded to Youga on the dubious grounds that Semedo won it in August.