Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Bouazza to Brum?

edited January 2009 in General Charlton
Bouazza off?

I don't rate him but i know others do. No loss imo.
«13

Comments

  • Personally I'd be gutted! Im in the rate him camp.
  • The one really effective creative player we have had this season
  • Will leave us very short on the left, when he plays well he is very useful.
  • He seems to be one of the few who can score/ create.

    We really have given up, haven't we?
  • lol we're doomed !!!!!!

    The owners of this club have a lot to answer for !!! Though I bet the AGM will be like a church.
  • I rate him and would be sorry to see him go but there will be a lot of hot air and rumours for the next three weeks.

    I thought he was on a season season long loan and Fulham only had an option to take him back to sell but I'm most likely wrong.
  • oh dear.

    I rate him too, and I think we'd miss his little bit of quality if he went.

    At times this season he's been the only attacking movement available and the only one looking to get on the ball and do something. Granted, his final ball isn't always the best, but thats wingers for you.
  • I like Bouazza. The club seem to do everything I don't want them to do, so we will probably lose him
  • his goal against Sheff Utd shpw how good he can be but then his misses LOL
  • LOL all these comments on how much we'll miss him.

    He was one of the "lazy loans who don't care, all rubbish, get rid of the lot of them" but now someone else might want him he'll be a huge miss. You couldn't write this stuff.
  • Sponsored links:


  • We should try and keep him. If we lose him then we are doomed down the left!
  • [cite]Posted By: blackheathaddick[/cite]Personally I'd be gutted! Im in the rate him camp.

    Dickson plays well wide left!
  • [quote][cite]Posted By: Henry Irving[/cite]LOL all these comments on how much we'll miss him.

    He was one of the "lazy loans who don't care, all rubbish, get rid of the lot of them" but now someone else might want him he'll be a huge miss. You couldn't write this stuff.[/quote]


    Henry - unfair - the only people to have replied so far say we'll miss him. I thought against QPR he didn't try and was at fault for a needless freekick for which Cook scored from - the disinterest he showed that day appalled me!

    HOWEVER - when his only replacement appears to be Basey, we'll be worse off without him, though I'd give my right arm back for Jerome Thomas in comparison to Bouazza or even enigmatic Ambrose from last season
  • [cite]Posted By: Dazzler21[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: blackheathaddick[/cite]Personally I'd be gutted! Im in the rate him camp.

    Dickson plays well wide left!

    for the reserves...:-(
  • I both don't rate him and don't like his style of play, but it would leave us woefully short in that area.

    We would have to replace.
  • it may be a wages issue.
  • wagstaff can play left, as i think one of the african lads due in anytime now aswell..
  • edited January 2009
    Ambrose will definately play there opening up a position for Shelvey to play the attacking free role! ;o)


    Elliott
    Moutouakil--Huds-Forts--McEverley
    --Sam---Racon---Zhi---Ambrose
    Shelvey
    Burton or Dickson

    Actually that really doesn't look too bad!
  • Its all very well saying the club should keep him but I doubt very much if they have any say in the matter.
  • Shelvey would make a good free roaming or winger in my opinion, but I can't see them wanting him in the first 11, ambrose is off if we get an offer as he hasn't signed a new deal.

    Bouazza may have a problem if someone put an offer in him - a loan release clause so it may not be something we can help.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Whatever one thinks of Bouazza this scenario rather reinforces the point Sailor made on the Murty thread about how beholden we are to the whim of the parent club with loans.

    The trouble is with no money to buy seemingly what other alternative do we have assuming our own players are deemed not good enough?
  • surely if a player signs a season long loan then that should mean hands off!!! anyone wanting to sign him should have to wait until the loan expires, im sure there are rules like that, unless fulham have a recall clause we should be keeping him.
  • Like AFKA says, whatever anyone's opinion on Bouazza, he needs replacing and that will stretch our finances even further.

    Of course we have CAFC's answer to Gareth Barry to come in there...cough, cough...

    Wagstaff!

    Not much to smile about, but that made me chuckle...!!! Nice one Adam.
  • the left backs wont miss him. lazy in my view and leaves too big a gap defensively eg at Blackpool where the crowd and McEveley told him just that!
  • and at Palarse
  • Not for me. He doesn't ever track back (our wide men have to do it) and whenever I've seen him live (Saturday being a prime example) his finishing is total shite.

    Crikey some of you talk about under-performing players like they're bloody Pele!

    NEXT!
  • [cite]Posted By: Brunello[/cite]Its all very well saying the club should keep him but I doubt very much if they have any say in the matter.

    worth repeating, this is the key point (particularly if Fulham are likely to be paying part / most of his wages still, which i suspect)
  • its all relative to what else we have i.e. zilchamondo...
  • [cite]Posted By: Sailor Browneye[/cite]Like AFKA says, whatever anyone's opinion on Bouazza, he needs replacing and that will stretch our finances even further.

    Not necessarily as we will have freed up the wages we are currently paying him.

    As Brunello says we may not have much of a say in the matter but it's not happened yet.
  • My main concern is the lack of real speed in the team especially upfront if he goes.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!