Why do we as human beings have to have someone to blame for everything? just one person fully takes responsiblity for things not a collective group?
charlton related - the team are underperforming for the wages they get paid to do their job, they lose games they should win, people blame pardew. Now the team are playing with a bit more spirit, the pressure is slightly off pardew as people have found some sympathy and because someone else may have made a mistake although have probably saved us a few goals/points in the past few games he's now the scapegoat.
non charlton related examples - Baby P - horrific that it has happened, by why do newspapers show a picture of the Shoesmith lady at the races and put the caption under neath "shoesmith enjoying a day at the races just 3 months after baby p died" I know someone should seriously look into what happened, but half of the public would be happy if she lost her job and the media would end their campaign.
another - ross/brand - i know its been done to death on here - but that furor went away as quickly as it appeared as soon as 2 people quit and one person was suspended. the public dust off their hands and move on to the next public campaign they can turn their hands to.
now, i know the media have a lot to answer for, but charlton fans (and probably football fans in general) are very quick to do the same? Why do we have to keep pushing and pushing for someone to take the blame for it or lose their jobs? why can't people accept that a collection of different factors is possibly the reason why the team aren't at the top of the table? the calls to drop weaver are frankly laughable - so he made a couple of howlers - he's also saved us on a few occasions when we were hanging on for a point and was let down by our defenders. think yourselves lucky he's not Gomes!
0
Comments
Maybe they don't feel that the good little things they can do can change things for the better - but they'd be wrong.
Most problems/situations/issues be it football, political or social are very complicated and have a number of different factors that impact on them. Lots of shades of grey (that's not a did at Andy BTW) but it is easier to be black or white and blame one person or one group of people.
People have failed miserably in that one and all should be sacked and blamed and I am afraid in such high profile cases the boss righly and deservedly should be the fall guy/gal because they run the dept. If my dept fails I get it in the neck and then it works it's way down that is the way it should be.
You are being very conservative to say half the public would want that shoesmith out I would say 95% more like.
As they're all in it for the payoff.
With regards to the football.. i suppose people want to know why its all gone so wrong and who if they can - can make it better. Got to stop the rot.
It has always been the same in my life time, but only appears to be more so due to more media .... internet, 48 news channels, newspapers.
What I don't like is "Computer says NO"
It also makes it easier to be informed... but that isn't as fun as having a good old moan and pointing the finger at someone.
I agree that heads should roll, but a pic of the woman at the races 2 months after the baby died - really? should her whole life be put on hold?
with the traffic wardens - fair enough B, I appreciate that there are business that aren't catered for in london, but your average person that "nips to the cash point" and moans that they get a fine are the people I mean.
I've twice seen security vans delivering cash to Banks getting tickets. I suppose they should park at the nearest NCP and walk.
I agree but that is a good example of a complicated problem reduced down to "it's the traffic wardens". There are a whole range of other, related issues such as the concentration of offices in a few parts of town, the footprint of the city having been created prior to the motor car, the need to keep traffic flowing, income targets for sub-contracted parking enforcement services, irresponsible parking by some people blocking other people who are trying to get somewhere, the poor design of newish buildings that lack loading bays or temp parking, the pricing out of local businesses such as bulk stationary suppliers from the City and West End by Starbucks et al, etc, etc, etc.
Fast foward to the future.... "EVIL CAFC insider Suzisausage is seen laughing and joking with friends at a trendy New Cross nightspot - just WEEKS after another dismal performance made children CRY. She was seen walking unsteadily and cracking crude jokes at the Venue while a Wham! tribute band played, with no regard to her team's abysmal form."
Going back to less trival matters, in which really does put life into prespective, what Suzi has to understand, that people like Pardew are in a result based industry, the fact of the matter is that he hasnt produced the rusults, not just in recent weeks but over the last year or so, and if anyone within a senior management consistantly failed to produce over a year there must be question marks over there current positon.
Perhaps if those people in those positions were more responsible or qualified to do there job maybe there wouldnt be this blame culture.
Yes, i fully agree there is an incorrect blame culture. For me its due to the fact media in this country is dominated by lowel-level and the desire to highlight news that isn't news.
BUT, with everything there has to be some level of accountability. Its why in most instances in life managers are paid more money than staff, to manage. If an office team is consistently underperforming, then it will eventually be the line manager that carries the can for that.
Football is different, but certain traits are still applied. Of course whether a team is a success or a failure is down to how the individuals play, but a manager is the one who acquires those players, decides how the budget should be allocated to those players, decides which ones to select, the formation and tactics that they should apply. Football managers should always be given time to get things the way they want, because there is a longer 'carry over' from the previous regime than there normally is in the wider world. But if after being given that time, if virtually all those not performing are ones he has hand picked, then it is perfectly right to question the reason on why they are underperforming, or whether the ones he brought in were not good enough for the level we are at or the fees and wages they are commanding.
Football is a very demanding game on all levels, but getting it right rewards very handsomely.
the Baby P thing is a valid example as the public are pushed by the media and their own habits to blame one person when yes you are right its disgusting that all those people didn't see the dangers over 60 visits. I totally agree that its not on that it happened and i totally agree that some people are not competant in their jobs, but more than one person is held responsible.
Thanks for your patronising comments, but what I do understand that is Pardew along with everyone else who is an employee is in a results based business whether that be by football results or budget targets etc. the same targets in all manor of employment not just in football. I agree that Charlton's results haven't been desirable, but why should the blame be put at just his door, when the players are underperforming, the finances haven't been the same as were first thought when pardew took the job, so his perameters may have been altered not allowing him to do his job properly, the same as any job when budgets have been cut?
He's just having one of those seasons eh.
I havent been to the last few games but I know that the team have been working hard daily as has the manager to stop the recent form and turn things around, and from the reports and comments i've read and heard it seems like we may be starting to turn a corner, i hope so. can't wait for saturday.
;-)
We stick with the status quo, through thick or thin, regardless of results ? Regardless of the impact it will have ?
I'm not being mischivous, i'm genuinely interested to know how long you people that are currently more patient than me are prepared to stay with it if results do not turn around for the better.
EG Gordon Brown and the economy. Is he solely to blame? Would having a tory chancellor have meant that we would have avoided the credit crunch completely or is he a victim of the world markets or the New World Order which really runs the world? Again no simple yes or no answer IMHO.
Robert Peston broke the news on Northern Rock, next we see huge queues and a run on a bank (something unheard of in the UK). Who de we blame here? Robert Peston, The BBC for employing him, the fools for queuing when their money was perfectly safe, the Government, George Bush, Lehman Brothers, Fanny Mac?
It's probably all of the above.
As Henry so eloquently puts it
All I want is my team to win, I want to be positive, I want them to turn the corner and get a result.
Playing the blame game does us no good when we should all be pulling together. The alternative is too horrible to contemplate.