Big football fans, as in "he's a big fan of xxxxx". This description even gets used for people who've never seen their team play. Is nobody just a normal fan anymore?
people who walk their dogs round the streets without a lead
This. Apart from anything else it's illegal.
Is it illegal? Please point me in the direction of the relevant Act of Parliament, thanks
It's part of the Dangerous Dogs Act.
100% wrong...dogs must be under control, no mention of must be on a lead.
Do dogs have to be kept on a lead on a public right of way? The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953 s1(2)(c) makes it an offence for a dog to be at large (that is to say not on a lead or otherwise under close control) in a field or enclosure in which there are sheep but under close control is not defined.
It is possible for the local highway authority to make an order under Section 27 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 requiring dogs to be kept on leads on specific public rights of way, although these require approval of the police and are rarely used.
Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier. If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier. If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
Surely it will still be dogshit unless you are taking a bull for a walk?
Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier. If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.
Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier. If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.
"A dog is considered ‘under control’ if it is on a lead held by someone able to control the dog. For example, a large dog would not be under control if its lead was held by a child who would be unable to restrain the dog if it strained against the lead.
It isn't necessary for dogs to be leashed at all times. However, dogs must be kept on a lead in designated pedestrian zones and on land where livestock is present. Councils have bye-laws to indicate areas where leashing is required, such as in public parks."
Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier. If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.
"A dog is considered ‘under control’ if it is on a lead held by someone able to control the dog. For example, a large dog would not be under control if its lead was held by a child who would be unable to restrain the dog if it strained against the lead.
It isn't necessary for dogs to be leashed at all times. However, dogs must be kept on a lead in designated pedestrian zones and on land where livestock is present. Councils have bye-laws to indicate areas where leashing is required, such as in public parks."
Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier. If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.
Is this really a problem? I don't see any dog walkers in the roads around my way with dogs off their leads. As long as dog owner clear up after their animals I don't have a problem dogs.
But I do have a problem with the police and their horses crapping up Floyd Road, You see the steaming piles and rivers of pee on the way to the ground but on the home its a bit of a lottery what one you step in. You always walk on the pavement but thats always got dog shit dotted about it.
Comments
Light amplification (by) Zoom emission (of) radiation.
Do dogs have to be kept on a lead on a public right of way?
The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953 s1(2)(c) makes it an offence for a dog to be at large (that is to say not on a lead or otherwise under close control) in a field or enclosure in which there are sheep but under close control is not defined.
It is possible for the local highway authority to make an order under Section 27 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 requiring dogs to be kept on leads on specific public rights of way, although these require approval of the police and are rarely used.
"I've been super busy", "it was super fun"... do shut up indeed!
It just too Twee for us Cafc fans.
I must dash, i off to the
SuperMarket.If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
Very annoying.
42 and still enjoy a blast on the ol' Xbox now and again. Spent far too much time in arcades when I was a yoot and it has never fully left my system.
1: they always seem so BLOODY HAPPY. Them with their never ending supply of energy and positive demeanour
2. They are the same aholes that don't just have a pint or Chinese, they have a cheeky pint or a cheeky chinese.
Pathetic happy twats
"A dog is considered ‘under control’ if it is on a lead held by someone able to control the dog. For example, a large dog would not be under control if its lead was held by a child who would be unable to restrain the dog if it strained against the lead.
It isn't necessary for dogs to be leashed at all times. However, dogs must be kept on a lead in designated pedestrian zones and on land where livestock is present. Councils have bye-laws to indicate areas where leashing is required, such as in public parks."
As long as dog owner clear up after their animals I don't have a problem dogs.
But I do have a problem with the police and their horses crapping up Floyd Road, You see the steaming piles and rivers of pee on the way to the ground but on the home its a bit of a lottery what one you step in.
You always walk on the pavement but thats always got dog shit dotted about it.