Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Goalkeeper

CafcmunichCafcmunich
in General Charlton
Bring back the bloke from last year please!
Due to our still great defence, this geezer has hardly anything to do, apart from punching instead of an easy catch.
Including today I blame 2 goals for poor goalkeeping. That would be an extra 2-4 points on the board...
«13

Comments

  • ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    I wasn't impressed with him, palming the strike back into the danger area - He had a better game this week, but I equally don't like his preference to punch the ball clear either.

    Am sure he'll get better - Mannion had his weak moments early on last season.
  • LeuthLeuth
    I'd say it was just bad luck it fell to one of them, but it wasn't bad luck. It was the curse 
  • fenaddickfenaddick
    He made some great passes which will get lost in the one mistake, loved him turning Coburn too
  • Danny AddickDanny Addick
    Garrymanilow said:
    Had a shot absolutely drilled at him from the level of the penalty spot and he's supposed to magically send it into space. The defending was poor and we shouldn't have even had the reprieve of the save but once we did them having a player unmarked to poke it back in was ridiculous. Kaminski had a good game, he was strong in the air and looked very comfortable until his defence let him down. The desire to pick out certain players as targets - Kaminski, Kelman, TC etc - is just bizarre. The 'bloke from last year' wasn't even on the bench today
    Yeah I’m with you on this tbh
  • valleynick66valleynick66
    We are under the impression he (Kaminski) was a significant part of the budget so that’s the point. 
  • sam3110sam3110
    valleynick66 said:
    We are under the impression he (Kaminski) was a significant part of the budget so that’s the point. 
    Are we?! We signed 10 players, spent about 10-11m in total and he was rumoured to be a tenth of that, hardly a "significant" part of the budget.

    He was good today, came out for a lot more than he usually does, looked calm with the ball at his feet and made a great save, unfortunately for all of us, none of the defence reacted in time and they scored from the rebound
  • Sponsored links:


  • fenaddickfenaddick
    valleynick66 said:
    We are under the impression he (Kaminski) was a significant part of the budget so that’s the point. 
    The rumoured fee was less than those for Kelman, Apter, Knibbs and Tanto. Ignoring the frees think the only cheaper ones would have been Burke and JRC so he’s slap bang in the middle 
  • valleynick66valleynick66
    edited September 13
    sam3110 said:
    valleynick66 said:
    We are under the impression he (Kaminski) was a significant part of the budget so that’s the point. 
    Are we?! We signed 10 players, spent about 10-11m in total and he was rumoured to be a tenth of that, hardly a "significant" part of the budget.

    He was good today, came out for a lot more than he usually does, looked calm with the ball at his feet and made a great save, unfortunately for all of us, none of the defence reacted in time and they scored from the rebound
    Well I believe it’s suggested he isn’t cheap in terms of his total cost ie wages and fees 

    He’s not yet been a marked improvement over our other 2 keepers relative to the money spent. 

    He’s yet to save us any points I’d say. 

    Disagree by all means but that’s my observation. 
  • fenaddickfenaddick
    Watched the goal back a few times now. Ball is fired very quickly from about 10 yards away. Kaminski’s reactions are good, he actually expects the ball to be going further to his left so has to adjust his hands. I think that’s why he parries it into danger. For some reason Coventry has decided to leave his man to charge towards the player who took the initial shot. Carey doesn’t notice and doesn’t cover Coventry’s man who then slots home. As ever with goals, it wasn’t one just one error 
  • gringogringo
    valleynick66 said:
    sam3110 said:
    valleynick66 said:
    We are under the impression he (Kaminski) was a significant part of the budget so that’s the point. 
    Are we?! We signed 10 players, spent about 10-11m in total and he was rumoured to be a tenth of that, hardly a "significant" part of the budget.

    He was good today, came out for a lot more than he usually does, looked calm with the ball at his feet and made a great save, unfortunately for all of us, none of the defence reacted in time and they scored from the rebound
    Well I believe it’s suggested he isn’t cheap in terms of his total cost ie wages and fees 

    He’s not yet been a marked improvement over our other 2 keepers relative to the money spent. 

    He’s yet to save us any points I’d say. 

    Disagree by all means but that’s my observation. 

  • msomertonmsomerton
    There seems to be a lot of hesitancy between him and the back four.
  • AndyGAndyG
    Like a few others have said I suspect NJ has fallen out with Mannion for him to have gone totally off radar unless he has taken his paternity leave lol. I would much rather Mannion in goal personally 
  • The Red RobinThe Red Robin
    Kaminski is still probably the best of the three, but it’s a low bar. Hopefully Jones is ruthless and we go shopping in January. 
  • ScohamScoham
    The Red Robin said:
    Kaminski is still probably the best of the three, but it’s a low bar. Hopefully Jones is ruthless and we go shopping in January. 
    Hopefully several players improve as the season goes on and we start scoring more goals and we defend better.

    Still far too early to decide Kaminski isn’t good enough.
  • AndyGAndyG
    Scoham said:
    The Red Robin said:
    Kaminski is still probably the best of the three, but it’s a low bar. Hopefully Jones is ruthless and we go shopping in January. 
    Hopefully several players improve as the season goes on and we start scoring more goals and we defend better.

    Still far too early to decide Kaminski isn’t good enough.
    It isn’t too early to say he doesn’t come for high balls into our box and although admittedly it’s a preference I prefer keepers to do that rather than having to risk the chaos of the ball ping ponging around our box 
  • Sponsored links:


  • CroydonCroydon
    https://x.com/GreatestLimbs/status/1966943442342474218?t=nyQg2kwkL0uTktbtljOJ2A&s=19


    The fucking state of this. It's dogshit 
  • RothkoRothko
    Croydon said:
    https://x.com/GreatestLimbs/status/1966943442342474218?t=nyQg2kwkL0uTktbtljOJ2A&s=19


    The fucking state of this. It's dogshit 
    Yeah, no Charlton player reacts to the save
  • CroydonCroydon
    Rothko said:
    Croydon said:
    https://x.com/GreatestLimbs/status/1966943442342474218?t=nyQg2kwkL0uTktbtljOJ2A&s=19


    The fucking state of this. It's dogshit 
    Yeah, no Charlton player reacts to the save
    It's all awful. The gaping hole in defence for the pass, the flap by Kaminski and the lack of reaction to the rebound. 
  • LittleAddickLittleAddick
    I don't think he was at fault for their goal today, but he's been poor. Not made any eye-catching saves, been indecisive with crosses, and I wouldn't call his distribution amazing either.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!