No admission that the club got anything wrong at all, in fact they think they did a really good job because it's the biggest attendance against the scum for 50 years. Nice to know where their priorities lie.
can you please point me to anywhere in that where it addresses the main thing that charlton fans are pissed off about - i.e that we are held back / re routed rather than them? - the nearest u get is asking if its new policy - absolutely pathetic - u should be making it abundantly clear that we are furious that this has happened again and there is no way we are putting up with it next season - talk about missing the point - absolute failure -and i respect people who give up their time for good causes etc etc but that gives me zero hope that cast will stop this happening again - u will roll over and have your bellies tickled and will allow the police to do the same to the club - a woeful attempt - i'm happy to help get the real point across if u need help
I look forward to you getting your big balls out and telling the police and club what for.
Honest to god…
i'd be happy to - do u not think that communication misses the main point? i.e why are we the only ground / fixture where this happens? where's the questioning, the request for explanation?
This bit?
Issues outside the stadium which we believe are matters for the police
No information as to why away fans were not held back – is it now
generally policy to clear the away fans quickly from the area? If so,
this should be clearly communicated
So presumably they're going to be asking the police those questions.
Where’s the bit about why we were effectively held back ? Told to walk the long way or encouraged to stay in the stadium - amounts to the same thing / the only fixture in the country this happens - kinda missed that key bit out didn’t you ?
That's implicit in the question about why Millwall weren't held back, and is one for the coppers.
It needs to ge an expressed question, not implicit - it’s fundamental the club understand why we are the only club in the country to suffer this imposition - as well as the police
Just to add that we are no longer the only club as it happened yesterday too
The spanners go to QPR on 18th Oct, will be interesting to see how the OB handles the after match procedures.
I have a QPR mate who says that the side roads are blocked up by police while the Millwall fans are marched to Shepherds Bush,Millwall fans are not a loud to go to White City,its blocked off for Millwall fans.Its a bit similar to us at Charlton
That response reads like it's been written by a kid on work experience, possibly the same one that listed literally every single foreign country where Saturday's game could be watched on TV including the Pitcairn Islands (population: 35).
That response reads like it's been written by a kid on work experience, possibly the same one that listed literally every single foreign country where Saturday's game could be watched on TV including the Pitcairn Islands (population: 35).
Ì was very grateful for that as I tuned in from Adamstown on Saturday.
That response reads like it's been written by a kid on work experience, possibly the same one that listed literally every single foreign country where Saturday's game could be watched on TV including the Pitcairn Islands (population: 35).
The "dealt with swiftly"remark is a farce,it was not dealt with at all.Left to two young stewards who got attacked.What would it cost the club to pay for around a dozen police officers to be inside the stadium on match days,to assist if anything got out of hand,or perhaps utilise the 20-30 who watched the game from the control tower area,but where nowhere to be seen when innocent people got attacked.
What a pathetic response, full of platitudes that insult the intelligence. In fact, when i was a civil servant very similar to drafts I would provide for Ministers to send back to MPs who had written to them - officially called PSOs but widely known as Please Sod Off.
For what its worth, I believe the Trust should go back and say that is not a satisfactory response.
They should then ask specific questions about the things that appear to have gone wrong, specifically on the stewarding/security front, not just make general observations.
If the Club refuse to answer, then the Trust should make a formal complaint to the licensing authority, Greenwich Council.
Comments
Nice to know where their priorities lie.
Ì was very grateful for that as I tuned in from Adamstown on Saturday.
What a pathetic response, full of platitudes that insult the intelligence. In fact, when i was a civil servant very similar to drafts I would provide for Ministers to send back to MPs who had written to them - officially called PSOs but widely known as Please Sod Off.
For what its worth, I believe the Trust should go back and say that is not a satisfactory response.
They should then ask specific questions about the things that appear to have gone wrong, specifically on the stewarding/security front, not just make general observations.
If the Club refuse to answer, then the Trust should make a formal complaint to the licensing authority, Greenwich Council.