Has anyone explained the dodgy declaration? Its almost got me thinking about Hansie Cronje !
I read somewhere that it was to prevent Lancs from picking up an extra bowling point as it was looking unlikely that we would pick any batting points up. Seeing as we're only 3(?) points in front of them, they're seeing every point as vital.
Has anyone explained the dodgy declaration? Its almost got me thinking about Hansie Cronje !
I read somewhere that it was to prevent Lancs from picking up an extra bowling point as it was looking unlikely that we would pick any batting points up. Seeing as we're only 3(?) points in front of them, they're seeing every point as vital.
Comments
244-7, leading by 43
262-8
264-9
268 all out, with a lead of 67.
Stoneman 9 n.o.
Burns 14 n.o.
Trail by 42.
Burns 25*, Stoneman 36*
92-0, leading by 25
154-1, leading by 87
Burns lbw b Parry 45
Borthwick c Vilas b Livingstone 4
Foakes c Parry b Livingstone 0
165-4, leading by 98
174-5, leading by 107
192-6 now, leading by 125
197-7, and that's lunch. Leading by 130.
241-8, leading by 174
Nice one Canters...!
242-9
242 all out - Sangakkara finishes 35 not out in his final first-class innings.
Lancashire will chase 176 to win.
A Bradman moment.
Davies lbw b Clarke 30
40-1