...is it just someone whose opinion differs from the majority?!
I thought half the fun of these forums was sharing viewpoints, especially those that may not be held as your own, in which case one can argue, discuss and even, dare I suggest, enjoy a little banter?!
Unfortunately, a few puerile individuals would appear to take a dim view of a newcomer who isn't 'up to speed' with previous threads relating to Phil Parkinson, nor my temerity to question whether or not Mark Kinsella was still held in high regard by the Charlton faithful, after his less than successful term accompanying PP in the management team. (Happily, it would appear his reputation remains undiminished.)
My posts may not be the most exciting ever featured on here, but WUM / Troll...seriously, what gives?!
0
Comments
Re Parkinson, the subject has been done to death on numerous occasions, spanning the last year.
Boring me half to death but,winding up,No
Welcome to the board and enjoy the time you have left on here.
'One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument.'
On the 4(?) threads that I've started, the most 'controversial' was 'Was PP shafted,' to which there was a mixed response! It maybe stirred a bit of debate (which is surely a good thing) but wound up a few of the regulars, who have clearly seen similar in the past 12 months. Apologies for being new on here!
:-)