For me the fact the club doesn't want it out there is sufficient reason to want to know what "it" is. Meire says it's no one's business. If the law says it must be disclosed then clearly she is mistaken. If the club is acting unlawfully to spare her blushes then the purpose is to embarrass her - and it would speak to the way the whole of the last three years have been a vanity project for her, in my view, while the club has crumbled.
So you embarrass her. What does that actually achieve ? It's pretty clear he'll sell if and when he wants & I see little merit in this. It's possibly even counter productive, because some fans will view it as being vindictive.
So you embarrass her. What does that actually achieve ? It's pretty clear he'll sell if and when he wants & I see little merit in this. It's possibly even counter productive, because some fans will view it as being vindictive.
A bit like her behaviour over the player of the year, then? Damn right she should be called to account because she has personally done more damage to the club than any chief exec we have ever had.
So you embarrass her. What does that actually achieve ? It's pretty clear he'll sell if and when he wants & I see little merit in this. It's possibly even counter productive, because some fans will view it as being vindictive.
A bit like her behaviour over the player of the year, then? Damn right she should be called to account because she has personally done more damage to the club than any chief exec we have ever had.
Carry on then. But as I say, you may just be building support for Meire.
So you embarrass her. What does that actually achieve ? It's pretty clear he'll sell if and when he wants & I see little merit in this. It's possibly even counter productive, because some fans will view it as being vindictive.
A bit like her behaviour over the player of the year, then? Damn right she should be called to account because she has personally done more damage to the club than any chief exec we have ever had.
Carry on then. But as I say, you may just be building support for Meire.
If people think the law doesn't matter that's their problem.
So you embarrass her. What does that actually achieve ? It's pretty clear he'll sell if and when he wants & I see little merit in this. It's possibly even counter productive, because some fans will view it as being vindictive.
A bit like her behaviour over the player of the year, then? Damn right she should be called to account because she has personally done more damage to the club than any chief exec we have ever had.
Carry on then. But as I say, you may just be building support for Meire.
You'll be campaigning for her to be canonised next, CE.
So you embarrass her. What does that actually achieve ? It's pretty clear he'll sell if and when he wants & I see little merit in this. It's possibly even counter productive, because some fans will view it as being vindictive.
A bit like her behaviour over the player of the year, then? Damn right she should be called to account because she has personally done more damage to the club than any chief exec we have ever had.
Carry on then. But as I say, you may just be building support for Meire.
You'll be campaigning for her to be canonised next, CE.
I don't support Meire in any way. I just feel if AB is coming across as vindictive, it may prove counter productive to his cause.
In the same way that the visit to Meire's parents strongly divided opinion. (obviously nothing to do with AB).
In summary it seems to be down to professional judgement although nobody is absolutely sure
Can't see all of that to read, but Charlton don't qualify as a "small company", which the visible bit seems to be about. They don't meet the relevant criteria.
In summary it seems to be down to professional judgement although nobody is absolutely sure
Can't see all of that to read, but Charlton don't qualify as a "small company", which the visible bit seems to be about. They don't meet the relevant criteria.
Is Charlton's turnover more than £10.2 m and its balance sheet total more than £5.1m in league 1?
In summary it seems to be down to professional judgement although nobody is absolutely sure
Can't see all of that to read, but Charlton don't qualify as a "small company", which the visible bit seems to be about. They don't meet the relevant criteria.
Is Charlton's turnover more than £10.2 m and its balance sheet total more than £5.1m in league 1?
Also - they are not relying on an exemption. They are actually disclosing directors' remuneration as zero and specifying that they don't have to disclose pay as chief executve.
In summary it seems to be down to professional judgement although nobody is absolutely sure
Can't see all of that to read, but Charlton don't qualify as a "small company", which the visible bit seems to be about. They don't meet the relevant criteria.
Is Charlton's turnover more than £10.2 m and its balance sheet total more than £5.1m in league 1?
I don't give a fuck about her , I want all stress and shit poured on her She has fucked up mine and my kids Charlton Life so I shit all her problems on her and may they continue till she fucks off outta my life
Disclaimer : 2 days all day drinking at Lords may have led to my foul language but the underlying feeling is I don't give a shit about that back and front cos she doesn't give a toss about us no matter what her fake platitudes are .
In summary it seems to be down to professional judgement although nobody is absolutely sure
Can't see all of that to read, but Charlton don't qualify as a "small company", which the visible bit seems to be about. They don't meet the relevant criteria.
Is Charlton's turnover more than £10.2 m and its balance sheet total more than £5.1m in league 1?
I don't give a fuck about her , I want all stress and shit poured on her She has fucked up mine and my kids Charlton Life so I shit all her problems on her and may they continue till she fucks off outta my life
Disclaimer : 2 days all day drinking at Lords may have led to my foul language but the underlying feeling is I don't give a shit about that back and front cos she doesn't give a toss about us no matter what her fake platitudes are .
THINK I understand where you're coming from, oohaah.....
I don't give a fuck about her , I want all stress and shit poured on her She has fucked up mine and my kids Charlton Life so I shit all her problems on her and may they continue till she fucks off outta my life
Disclaimer : 2 days all day drinking at Lords may have led to my foul language but the underlying feeling is I don't give a shit about that back and front cos she doesn't give a toss about us no matter what her fake platitudes are .
I agree, I don't care about her either. But the middle ground support, might start drifting toward her.
I don't give a fuck about her , I want all stress and shit poured on her She has fucked up mine and my kids Charlton Life so I shit all her problems on her and may they continue till she fucks off outta my life
Disclaimer : 2 days all day drinking at Lords may have led to my foul language but the underlying feeling is I don't give a shit about that back and front cos she doesn't give a toss about us no matter what her fake platitudes are .
I don't give a fuck about her , I want all stress and shit poured on her She has fucked up mine and my kids Charlton Life so I shit all her problems on her and may they continue till she fucks off outta my life
Disclaimer : 2 days all day drinking at Lords may have led to my foul language but the underlying feeling is I don't give a shit about that back and front cos she doesn't give a toss about us no matter what her fake platitudes are .
It doesn't make any difference. If she is paid to be chief executive by Charlton Athletic Football Co, as both she and Joyes have confirmed, all the evidence and professional advice I've been given says her salary has to be declared as directors' remuneration, just like her predecessors'.
Let's say her is salary is made public. Then what?
This ?
I would agree but as it is something they want to hide maybe there is something to hide.
I don't care what she gets paid but it's clearly an issue for her.
The issue may be her being embarrassed by what she gets paid.
but she won't be embarrassed by it.
She has been placed in a job by a family friend who will probably never sack or replace her. Everyone in football who has taken an interest knows she is not up to the job.
I don't give a fuck about her , I want all stress and shit poured on her She has fucked up mine and my kids Charlton Life so I shit all her problems on her and may they continue till she fucks off outta my life
Disclaimer : 2 days all day drinking at Lords may have led to my foul language but the underlying feeling is I don't give a shit about that back and front cos she doesn't give a toss about us no matter what her fake platitudes are .
I agree, I don't care about her either. But the middle ground support, might start drifting toward her.
Let's say her is salary is made public. Then what?
This ?
I would agree but as it is something they want to hide maybe there is something to hide.
I don't care what she gets paid but it's clearly an issue for her.
The issue may be her being embarrassed by what she gets paid.
but she won't be embarrassed by it.
She has been placed in a job by a family friend who will probably never sack or replace her. Everyone in football who has taken an interest knows she is not up to the job.
Let's say her is salary is made public. Then what?
This ?
well for me I'd be happy that she'd be well pissed off. They have gone to great lengths to not disclose it so if it was then disclosed she would not be happy. It may seem petty but I'd see it as a minor victory in the war against the regime. Anything that annoys them is great in my opinion.
So you embarrass her. What does that actually achieve ? It's pretty clear he'll sell if and when he wants & I see little merit in this. It's possibly even counter productive, because some fans will view it as being vindictive.
A bit like her behaviour over the player of the year, then? Damn right she should be called to account because she has personally done more damage to the club than any chief exec we have ever had.
Carry on then. But as I say, you may just be building support for Meire.
You'll be campaigning for her to be canonised next, CE.
Which way should the cannon be pointing when we put her in it?
The suspicion is that on top of her stunning incompetence, she is being vastly overpaid in relation to the market and previous incumbents to do it. None of the long line of former CEO's would have survived half the calamities she has. The reason it's being withheld is to avoid embarrassment and is yet another example of their sheer arrogance. This is the woman who when asked how she was still in post managed to burble that the mere fact she was still in post showed she hadn't deserved the sack. The fact that she is so vastly overpaid is another reason why she clings so desperately to her position in the face of overwhelming evidence that she should stand down or be removed from post.
So you embarrass her. What does that actually achieve ? It's pretty clear he'll sell if and when he wants & I see little merit in this. It's possibly even counter productive, because some fans will view it as being vindictive.
A bit like her behaviour over the player of the year, then? Damn right she should be called to account because she has personally done more damage to the club than any chief exec we have ever had.
Carry on then. But as I say, you may just be building support for Meire.
You'll be campaigning for her to be canonised next, CE.
Which way should the cannon be pointing when we put her in it?
Comments
It's pretty clear he'll sell if and when he wants & I see little merit in this.
It's possibly even counter productive, because some fans will view it as being vindictive.
In the same way that the visit to Meire's parents strongly divided opinion. (obviously nothing to do with AB).
https://www.accountingweb.co.uk/business/financial-reporting/frs-102-creates-element-of-confusion-around-related-party-disclosures
In summary it seems to be down to professional judgement although nobody is absolutely sure
EDIT: This explains it better. The first link doesn't seem to be available in its entirety.
http://www.aatcomment.org.uk/frs-102-directors-transactions-for-small-companies/
https://www.hwfisher.co.uk/frs-102-and-small-companies/
Also - they are not relying on an exemption. They are actually disclosing directors' remuneration as zero and specifying that they don't have to disclose pay as chief executve.
She has fucked up mine and my kids Charlton Life so I shit all her problems on her and may they continue till she fucks off outta my life
Disclaimer : 2 days all day drinking at Lords may have led to my foul language but the underlying feeling is I don't give a shit about that back and front cos she doesn't give a toss about us no matter what her fake platitudes are .
(A bit like the recent election).
She has been placed in a job by a family friend who will probably never sack or replace her.
Everyone in football who has taken an interest knows she is not up to the job.
Embarrassed. No chance.