Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

STATBANK: STOKE CITY 3-0 CHARLTON - *****AMENDED*****

lancashire lad
lancashire lad Posts: 15,686
edited November 29 in General Charlton

Some amendments here but there are still a couple of errors in pages 3 and 4, namely Docs and Berry's marks which I'll correct after the next match

many thanks to the 43 Lifers who gave marks

Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 20.01.23.png Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 20.01.33.png Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 16.45.36.png Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 16.45.49.png Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 16.46.05.png Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 16.49.46.png Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 20.05.09.png

Comments

  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,146
    Terrible scores for a terrible result! 

    Thanks LL.

    I wonder if there should be a minimum score a player needs to hit to get the “Player of the Match” accolade?
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,286
    Wasn't expecting Doc to be top 

    (goes to check the submitted marks to see if new member GDoc1234 had given him a 10)
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,686
    se9addick said:
    Terrible scores for a terrible result! 

    Thanks LL.

    I wonder if there should be a minimum score a player needs to hit to get the “Player of the Match” accolade?
    No - it is what it is, and the best score is still an indication that the player played a better game than the rest of them
  • KiwiValley
    KiwiValley Posts: 3,404
    No one answered my question in the last statbank about whether 6.03 was the lowest ever man of the match score. Docherty has just answered for you useless lot.
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,686
    edited November 26
    KiwiValley said:
    No one answered my question in the last statbank about whether 6.03 was the lowest ever man of the match score. Docherty has just answered for you useless lot.
    I believe that you could answer your question yourself by delving back through the site, as for me being "useless" - get stuffed!
  • Northupper
    Northupper Posts: 54
    I think that Docherty's average is incorrect.  My calculation is that it should be 4.03.  BTW, I really appreciate all the work that you put into these stats LA
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 23,386
    edited November 26
    Keep up the amazing work Lancs, wonderful stuff I certainly wouldn't fancy taking on...🤦‍♂️
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,917
    edited November 26
    I think Conor Coventry picked up his fourth yellow last night . Ditto great work Lancs 
  • KiwiValley
    KiwiValley Posts: 3,404
    lancashire lad said:
    KiwiValley said:
    No one answered my question in the last statbank about whether 6.03 was the lowest ever man of the match score. Docherty has just answered for you useless lot.
    I believe that you could answer your question yourself by delving back through the site, as for me being "useless" - get stuffed!
    Said in jest @lancashire lad , said in jest. <3

    My point was that i thought we were at a low point but the team said "hold our beers".

  • KiwiValley
    KiwiValley Posts: 3,404
    And certainly wasn't a ribbing directed at you, the studious compiler of said stats. I had assumed that the evergloomy amongst us would have that insight to hand.

  • Sponsored links:



  • mattwils
    mattwils Posts: 218
    killerandflash said:
    Wasn't expecting Doc to be top 

    (goes to check the submitted marks to see if new member GDoc1234 had given him a 10)
    Me neither. To be fair none of them emerged with any credit but doc and cov werr much higher than I would have expected 
  • mattwils
    mattwils Posts: 218
    Interesting the average was slightly below Southampton. 4.4 v 4.42. But both were utterly dire, I’d say second half v Southampton was better but first half last night not as bad. Could have been interesting if it hadn’t been for kiminski’s errors
  • paulsturgess
    paulsturgess Posts: 3,940
    Wow wtf amazed docherty first thought he was terrible - like they all were but thought he was particularly shite again just needed midfield to try and drag us forward a bit but just panic and poor touches every time they got the ball 
  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,970
    I'm surprised Bree was marked so generously as he forgot the first duty of any full back.

Categories

“Marketplace”