Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

++Charlie Kelman signs on a 4 year deal++

13738394042

Comments

  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,403
    The Hull commentators mentioned that today was his 34th Champ appearance and he has yet to score a goal. I know he played out of position for a portion of those, but I found that to be a pretty sobering statistic. 
  • I wish our fans would stop with the godden will make us more competitive.  He had played in the championship a number of years and with the exception of one year,  he is generally scoring 6 or 7 goals a year. Nice squad player at this level but at 34 years and coming off an injury,  dont expect much.  For better or worse it is our current crop of forwards who have to make a difference 
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 693
    Even if it’s 6 or 7 a year that would still probably outscore all our other forwards 
  • IR94
    IR94 Posts: 776
    Chunes said:
    The Hull commentators mentioned that today was his 34th Champ appearance and he has yet to score a goal. I know he played out of position for a portion of those, but I found that to be a pretty sobering statistic. 
    Even worse, it was his 35th, that is quite a damming statistic 
  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,209
    edited October 26
    Bit of credit should go his way for the goal today. Nothing exceptional but he does a nice job of following the goalie’s movement to make sure he’s (legally) blocked off from coming for Bree’s cross which, otherwise, would’ve been right in the zone for the keeper to come and catch it. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,728
    edited October 26
    Chunes said:
    The Hull commentators mentioned that today was his 34th Champ appearance and he has yet to score a goal. I know he played out of position for a portion of those, but I found that to be a pretty sobering statistic. 
    Until he joined us, his Championship minutes rivalled Karlan Grant for us, before he went on loan to Crawley. 

    Context is needed when talking about those appearances

    Am pretty sure from my research at the start of the season, that the Watford game was only Kelman's second start as a Striker at this level. The other handful of starts were as a winger, which he clearly isn't. 
  • drawnablank
    drawnablank Posts: 778
    edited October 26
    Kelman = 619 mins, 6 shots, 4 on target, 0 goals & 0 assists
    Olaofe = 209 mins, 5 shots, 3 on target, 1 goal & 1 assist
    Leaburn = 524 mins, 15 shots, 6 on target, 1 goal & 0 assists
    Campbell = 878 mins, 23 shots, 3 on target, 0 goals & 2 assist
    (Championship stats)
    Make of that what you will…
  • Kelman = 619 mins, 6 shots, 4 on target, 0 goals & 0 assists
    Olaofe = 209 mins, 5 shots, 3 on target, 1 goal & 1 assist
    Leaburn = 524 mins, 15 shots, 6 on target, 1 goal & 0 assists
    Campbell = 878 mins, 23 shots, 3 on target, 0 goals & 1 assist
    (Championship stats)
    Make of that what you will…
    Campbell has at least two assists, whilst an argument can be made for a third; Apter (QPR), Leaburn (Ipswich) and Carey (Sheff Wed) 
  • drawnablank
    drawnablank Posts: 778
    edited October 26
    Kelman = 619 mins, 6 shots, 4 on target, 0 goals & 0 assists
    Olaofe = 209 mins, 5 shots, 3 on target, 1 goal & 1 assist
    Leaburn = 524 mins, 15 shots, 6 on target, 1 goal & 0 assists
    Campbell = 878 mins, 23 shots, 3 on target, 0 goals & 1 assist
    (Championship stats)
    Make of that what you will…
    Campbell has at least two assists, whilst an argument can be made for a third; Apter (QPR), Leaburn (Ipswich) and Carey (Sheff Wed) 
    Cheers FA. Not sure Sheff Wed gets counted as an assist but I agree that his input towards the goal was significant 
  • CAFC_boi
    CAFC_boi Posts: 282
    Kelman = 619 mins, 6 shots, 4 on target, 0 goals & 0 assists
    Olaofe = 209 mins, 5 shots, 3 on target, 1 goal & 1 assist
    Leaburn = 524 mins, 15 shots, 6 on target, 1 goal & 0 assists
    Campbell = 878 mins, 23 shots, 3 on target, 0 goals & 2 assist
    (Championship stats)
    Make of that what you will

    quite sobering really when TC has just over 15% shot accuracy … 

  • Sponsored links:



  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,404
    CAFC_boi said:
    Kelman = 619 mins, 6 shots, 4 on target, 0 goals & 0 assists
    Olaofe = 209 mins, 5 shots, 3 on target, 1 goal & 1 assist
    Leaburn = 524 mins, 15 shots, 6 on target, 1 goal & 0 assists
    Campbell = 878 mins, 23 shots, 3 on target, 0 goals & 2 assist
    (Championship stats)
    Make of that what you will

    quite sobering really when TC has just over 15% shot accuracy … 
    Not saying it’s good enough but this is a context thing again. Campbell shoots from out wide and is aiming for a slim piece of the goal, a lot of his shots go just past the post (I can think of 3/4 in the last 2 games) whereas the others are shooting more centrally with a larger target to aim for 
  • Sword65pf
    Sword65pf Posts: 82
    He will get his goals, However whilst we are getting results I don’t care who is scoring.
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,348
    Sword65pf said:
    Think people need to be fair in they’re views, Charlie was/ is getting judged by shots when he starts and coming off the bench, now I’m ok with all our forwards they all contribute in different ways, with this in mind how many shots did Leaburn have today as a starter?, I don’t recall any so will he be viewed in the same way as Kelman? We need patience with these boys, the attitude of them all is going to see them ok I believe. I think we will see Kelman and oloafe start next week.

    If Leaburn has a stinker of a season I can see him being offloaded in the summer.
    Been our best striker this season ffs. 21 year old playing championship football for the first time and he’s been decent. Absolutely no chance he leaves in the summer unless he does really well and big money comes in for him 
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,218
    It does feel like of all our strikers Kelman is the one I least expect to make an impact when he comes on as a sub. Tanto can bulldoze tired defenders, Campbell can torture them with his pace and Leaburn is a nightmare when the high balls start coming in late on but Kelman feels at the moment more like he's the sacrificial player started to tire opposition defences out to make our other strikers' best attributes have more impact later. It's definitely a valid role he plays but if he doesn't start and do that he's not really looking like changing a game from the bench. In time I hope he starts pouncing on the few chances we create earlier in games to get himself on the scoresheet but I don't think he's that suited to coming on as a sub in this team.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,960
    Kelman = 619 mins, 6 shots, 4 on target, 0 goals & 0 assists
    Olaofe = 209 mins, 5 shots, 3 on target, 1 goal & 1 assist
    Leaburn = 524 mins, 15 shots, 6 on target, 1 goal & 0 assists
    Campbell = 878 mins, 23 shots, 3 on target, 0 goals & 2 assist
    (Championship stats)
    Make of that what you will…
    What's key to me is whether players are making an impact on the pitch, and in the right place to be useful. Miles yesterday didn't get the flick on, but his presence meant the Hull player marking him got the flick on instead. Tanto on Tuesday had the saved shot which led to the Gillesphey goal.

    Tap ins look easy, but you have to be in the right place to get the easy finish. Berry was yesterday,  it's no coincidence that he gets those sort of goals  
  • paulsturgess
    paulsturgess Posts: 3,861
    fenaddick said:
    CAFC_boi said:
    Kelman = 619 mins, 6 shots, 4 on target, 0 goals & 0 assists
    Olaofe = 209 mins, 5 shots, 3 on target, 1 goal & 1 assist
    Leaburn = 524 mins, 15 shots, 6 on target, 1 goal & 0 assists
    Campbell = 878 mins, 23 shots, 3 on target, 0 goals & 2 assist
    (Championship stats)
    Make of that what you will

    quite sobering really when TC has just over 15% shot accuracy … 
    Not saying it’s good enough but this is a context thing again. Campbell shoots from out wide and is aiming for a slim piece of the goal, a lot of his shots go just past the post (I can think of 3/4 in the last 2 games) whereas the others are shooting more centrally with a larger target to aim for 
    Mmm. Think that’s selective. He missed two chances yesterday that were as good a chance as any our strikers have had all season, think he also missed a pretty much open goal header earlier in the season. TC brings so much but his finishing, crossing and passing are woeful 
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 693
    fenaddick said:
    CAFC_boi said:
    Kelman = 619 mins, 6 shots, 4 on target, 0 goals & 0 assists
    Olaofe = 209 mins, 5 shots, 3 on target, 1 goal & 1 assist
    Leaburn = 524 mins, 15 shots, 6 on target, 1 goal & 0 assists
    Campbell = 878 mins, 23 shots, 3 on target, 0 goals & 2 assist
    (Championship stats)
    Make of that what you will

    quite sobering really when TC has just over 15% shot accuracy … 
    Not saying it’s good enough but this is a context thing again. Campbell shoots from out wide and is aiming for a slim piece of the goal, a lot of his shots go just past the post (I can think of 3/4 in the last 2 games) whereas the others are shooting more centrally with a larger target to aim for 
    Mmm. Think that’s selective. He missed two chances yesterday that were as good a chance as any our strikers have had all season, think he also missed a pretty much open goal header earlier in the season. TC brings so much but his finishing, crossing and passing are woeful 
    Actually think his crossing and passing has gone up a level this season he could have easily had more assists eg Jones headers at Blackburn and Watford. His finishing/decision making is absolute dire but then again you could argue if he could do that he wouldn’t be here 
  • paulsturgess
    paulsturgess Posts: 3,861
    fenaddick said:
    CAFC_boi said:
    Kelman = 619 mins, 6 shots, 4 on target, 0 goals & 0 assists
    Olaofe = 209 mins, 5 shots, 3 on target, 1 goal & 1 assist
    Leaburn = 524 mins, 15 shots, 6 on target, 1 goal & 0 assists
    Campbell = 878 mins, 23 shots, 3 on target, 0 goals & 2 assist
    (Championship stats)
    Make of that what you will

    quite sobering really when TC has just over 15% shot accuracy … 
    Not saying it’s good enough but this is a context thing again. Campbell shoots from out wide and is aiming for a slim piece of the goal, a lot of his shots go just past the post (I can think of 3/4 in the last 2 games) whereas the others are shooting more centrally with a larger target to aim for 
    Mmm. Think that’s selective. He missed two chances yesterday that were as good a chance as any our strikers have had all season, think he also missed a pretty much open goal header earlier in the season. TC brings so much but his finishing, crossing and passing are woeful 
    Actually think his crossing and passing has gone up a level this season he could have easily had more assists eg Jones headers at Blackburn and Watford. His finishing/decision making is absolute dire but then again you could argue if he could do that he wouldn’t be here 
    Still very erratic at best, a couple of awful crosses and passes straight to their men yesterday, would be interested to see his stats around pass completion / ball retention  
  • Bit of credit should go his way for the goal today. Nothing exceptional but he does a nice job of following the goalie’s movement to make sure he’s (legally) blocked off from coming for Bree’s cross which, otherwise, would’ve been right in the zone for the keeper to come and catch it. 
    Hmm. Can't help but think that really is clutching at straws trying to justify his performance.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,884
    edited October 26
    Kelman = 619 mins, 6 shots, 4 on target, 0 goals & 0 assists
    Olaofe = 209 mins, 5 shots, 3 on target, 1 goal & 1 assist
    Leaburn = 524 mins, 15 shots, 6 on target, 1 goal & 0 assists
    Campbell = 878 mins, 23 shots, 3 on target, 0 goals & 2 assist
    (Championship stats)
    Make of that what you will…
    Those don't tell the full story though. In the case of Kelman, I don't think that too many would argue that he didn't contribute to Bree's goal against Derby, with that sublime first touch to bring that ball down from Kaminski's drop kick or play a part to Carey's goal against Ipswich where he took defenders with him to open the space up. 

    The bottom line is this, though. We are in the play offs at the moment. NJ doesn't play the sort of football that is going to lead us to creating loads of chances. It's functional and the fact that Middlebrough are second  having scored just two more goals, Millwall are third with the same number as us and Stoke are fifth having scored one less suggests that we aren't unique in utilising that modus operandi. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • PaddyP17
    PaddyP17 Posts: 13,042
    Okay. Right. Look. I know this comment is not a direct comparison because it would be sacrilege, but we achieved our best-ever Prem finish in 2003/04 with di Canio only scoring 4 league goals, all of which were penalties (I'm pretty sure).

    I am not for one second suggesting that Charlie Kelman is like Paolo di Canio. Far from it. Very very far from it. But it is a team game - and if the team can perform well, even if Kelman isn't scoring loads and loads (I mean I will be concerned if he doesn't score at all tbf), that's what matters to me. I haven't been concerned about us as a football side - only when that becomes an issue will we need to look a bit closer imho.
  • RonnieMoore
    RonnieMoore Posts: 4,529
    Well one thing yesterday proved was that we need Kelman in the team .. Hull defence had a quite day no one chasing them , putting pressure on them they had time to conduct attacks ..Leaburn not the same player when he starts and the defenders are fresh ..to much fuss about how many goals he scored does it matter .. you people be happy if we were relegated but Kelman scored 15 goals or if we were promoted and he only scored 3/4 but assisted in a lot more .. look how many diff scorers we have had already ..
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,884
    Here's something else to consider. This is Luton's record in two consecutive seasons in the Championship:

    2021-22    F-63    A-55    GD-8     Pts-75    Pos-6th (Lost in Play offs)   
    2022-23    F-57    A-39    GD-18   Pts-80    Pos-3rd (Promoted)

    NJ left in November 2022 so he wasn't there when they went up but there is no doubt that it was his team. If we were to pro-rata our stats this season, after 12 games, to 46 matches, this is what we would achieve:

    2025-26    F-54    A-38    GD-16    Pts-73   Pos-6th

    So, we are on target to score 9 less goals than Luton in 2021-22 but to concede 17 less goals with 2 less points and the same position. The interesting aspect is that Luton, after 12 games had scored 20 and conceded 16 but were 2 points worse off that season than we are currently. 

    Who scores the goals is an irrelevancy. It is the goals against column that will get us points because we have goals from everywhere - we've had 9 different scorers - and that is a lot harder to defend than against a side that is wholly reliant on one or two players.    
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,389
    PaddyP17 said:
    Okay. Right. Look. I know this comment is not a direct comparison because it would be sacrilege, but we achieved our best-ever Prem finish in 2003/04 with di Canio only scoring 4 league goals, all of which were penalties (I'm pretty sure).

    I am not for one second suggesting that Charlie Kelman is like Paolo di Canio. Far from it. Very very far from it. But it is a team game - and if the team can perform well, even if Kelman isn't scoring loads and loads (I mean I will be concerned if he doesn't score at all tbf), that's what matters to me. I haven't been concerned about us as a football side - only when that becomes an issue will we need to look a bit closer imho.
    Yeah PDC never scored from his own half ;) 
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 693
    fenaddick said:
    CAFC_boi said:
    Kelman = 619 mins, 6 shots, 4 on target, 0 goals & 0 assists
    Olaofe = 209 mins, 5 shots, 3 on target, 1 goal & 1 assist
    Leaburn = 524 mins, 15 shots, 6 on target, 1 goal & 0 assists
    Campbell = 878 mins, 23 shots, 3 on target, 0 goals & 2 assist
    (Championship stats)
    Make of that what you will

    quite sobering really when TC has just over 15% shot accuracy … 
    Not saying it’s good enough but this is a context thing again. Campbell shoots from out wide and is aiming for a slim piece of the goal, a lot of his shots go just past the post (I can think of 3/4 in the last 2 games) whereas the others are shooting more centrally with a larger target to aim for 
    Mmm. Think that’s selective. He missed two chances yesterday that were as good a chance as any our strikers have had all season, think he also missed a pretty much open goal header earlier in the season. TC brings so much but his finishing, crossing and passing are woeful 
    Actually think his crossing and passing has gone up a level this season he could have easily had more assists eg Jones headers at Blackburn and Watford. His finishing/decision making is absolute dire but then again you could argue if he could do that he wouldn’t be here 
    Still very erratic at best, a couple of awful crosses and passes straight to their men yesterday, would be interested to see his stats around pass completion / ball retention  
     TC’s passing stats are actually really impressive didn’t realise they were that good 
  • CafcSteve
    CafcSteve Posts: 761
    edited October 26
    Well one thing yesterday proved was that we need Kelman in the team .. Hull defence had a quite day no one chasing them , putting pressure on them they had time to conduct attacks ..Leaburn not the same player when he starts and the defenders are fresh ..to much fuss about how many goals he scored does it matter .. you people be happy if we were relegated but Kelman scored 15 goals or if we were promoted and he only scored 3/4 but assisted in a lot more .. look how many diff scorers we have had already ..
    They barely conducting any attacks?

    Their goal was from a defensive error.

    Why would any Charlton fan be happy if we were to get relegated?

    He hasn’t got an assist yet has he?
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 693
    Well one thing yesterday proved was that we need Kelman in the team .. Hull defence had a quite day no one chasing them , putting pressure on them they had time to conduct attacks ..Leaburn not the same player when he starts and the defenders are fresh ..to much fuss about how many goals he scored does it matter .. you people be happy if we were relegated but Kelman scored 15 goals or if we were promoted and he only scored 3/4 but assisted in a lot more .. look how many diff scorers we have had already ..
    Only thing I Learnt from our forward line on Saturday is that Leaburn TC and Tanto look better off the bench and Kelman looks the same whether he starts or comes off the bench

    When Kelman is only starting because it actually allows our other forwards to look better when they come on its slightly concerning. Kelman obviously does his bit but he’s not put in the kind of performance like we have seen with Tanto at Blackburn TC at Millwall or Leaburn at Ipswich
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 29,183
    Chunes said:
    The Hull commentators mentioned that today was his 34th Champ appearance and he has yet to score a goal. I know he played out of position for a portion of those, but I found that to be a pretty sobering statistic. 
    Until he joined us, his Championship minutes rivalled Karlan Grant for us, before he went on loan to Crawley. 

    Context is needed when talking about those appearances

    Am pretty sure from my research at the start of the season, that the Watford game was only Kelman's second start as a Striker at this level. The other handful of starts were as a winger, which he clearly isn't. 
    Why did he change his name?
  • balham red
    balham red Posts: 1,290
    CafcSteve said:
    Well one thing yesterday proved was that we need Kelman in the team .. Hull defence had a quite day no one chasing them , putting pressure on them they had time to conduct attacks ..Leaburn not the same player when he starts and the defenders are fresh ..to much fuss about how many goals he scored does it matter .. you people be happy if we were relegated but Kelman scored 15 goals or if we were promoted and he only scored 3/4 but assisted in a lot more .. look how many diff scorers we have had already ..
    They barely conducting any attacks?

    Their goal was from a defensive error.

    Why would any Charlton fan be happy if we were to get relegated?

    He hasn’t got an assist yet has he?
    Well okay,  no assists yet, but he did a really hard shot a few games ago.
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,196
    It’s easier to come on later on 
    he was in the same postcode when we scored again