Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2025

1106107108109110112»

Comments

  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,308
    You all say this like Pakistan aren't going to roll over for 50
  • PrincessFiona
    PrincessFiona Posts: 5,432
    76-7 and they still have almost 29 overs to go.

    Beth Mooney, on 33* (38) must be spitting feathers at the ineptitude of her partners in playing what is slow spin on an even slower wicket.  
    Just turned this on and shocked to see the score
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    Leuth said:
    You all say this like Pakistan aren't going to roll over for 50

    Hope you got stuck into the 2.66 on Australia that was available. A bit better value than the pre-match 1.02
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    Last time the two teams played in an ODI, Pakistan scored 235-7
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    Fantastic legside stumping to get rid of Garth

    115-8
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    Leuth said:
    You all say this like Pakistan aren't going to roll over for 50
    I'm not watching, but it wouldn't surprise me if Pakistan really struggle when they bat. 76-7 to 115-8 feels like letting Australia off the hook.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    Leuth said:
    You all say this like Pakistan aren't going to roll over for 50
    I'm not watching, but it wouldn't surprise me if Pakistan really struggle when they bat. 76-7 to 115-8 feels like letting Australia off the hook.
    Australia batted really poorly on this pitch. There's been nothing in it for the seamers and the batters have just been playing too early to balls that have been slow turners. Mooney has played it as it should be played - seeing the ball early and playing it as late as possible. 

    That's not to say that Pakistan will chase down what looks likely to be 180 plus. But the Australian top order only have themselves to blame - bar Mooney that is.  
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    100* (110) for Mooney out of 186-8 (47.5)
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    Alana King with her first ODI 50* (48)
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    221-9 (50)

    Mooney out off the final ball of the innings for 109 (114).

    Mooney & King with the highest 9th wicket partnership in ODI history with a stand of 106. Between them they contributed 160-1 off 163 balls. The rest produced 53-8 off 137 balls.

    Pakistan seamers: 20-1-123-3
    Pakistan spinners: 30-3-98-6


  • Sponsored links:



  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,308
    That is definitely the most predictable lower-order turnaround in cricket history tbf
  • Swindon_Addick
    Swindon_Addick Posts: 1,615
    Well it was fun while it lasted. Brilliant batting by Mooney and King (he says through gritted teeth) but we were so close to one of the biggest upsets in history. Aargh.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,903
    edited 1:57PM
    Boland is very good, especially in helpful conditions, but he's no Cummins who's an all time great. 309 wickets at 22, in all conditions. 

    Their captain too.
    Agree with this. It also means they have to dig into the depths for their next back up in the squad. It's very unlikely starc and Hazlewood will be able to play all 5, Boland is 36 now? Will he be able to play 5 back to back. They will need at least one other quick. There aren't any real experienced options out there. The likes of Nesser and Abbott have experience but very few tests and are also getting on towards 35 now. Or they can try a young up and coming player but that's tough in the intensity of an Ashes series.
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,017
    edited 2:02PM
    Aren't most of the younger backup Aussie quicks injured anyway? Lance Morris I think is out, Spencer Johnson doesn't seem to be anywhere near red ball selection and has been injured, Jhye Richardson seems to be always injured. Maybe a call up for brief Kent overseas Xavier Bartlett or Fergus O'Neill? 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 10,945
    MarcusH26 said:
    Aren't most of the younger backup Aussie quicks injured anyway? Lance Morris I think is out, Spencer Johnson doesn't seem to be anywhere near red ball selection and has been injured . Maybe a call up for brief Kent overseas Xavier Bartlett or Fergus O'Neill? 
    Yeah they've had one or two other back issues. A bit of a pickle for them really
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    The Aussies might have to turn to Brendan Doggett or even Michael Nesser 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    Leuth said:
    You all say this like Pakistan aren't going to roll over for 50
    50 might be generous. Eyman just played the sort of slog not seen since I last played cricket donkey years ago. With the same result!
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    Leuth said:
    You all say this like Pakistan aren't going to roll over for 50
    I'm feeling smug that I liked this comment, rather than LOLing it  :D


  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,903
    fenaddick said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    Aren't most of the younger backup Aussie quicks injured anyway? Lance Morris I think is out, Spencer Johnson doesn't seem to be anywhere near red ball selection and has been injured . Maybe a call up for brief Kent overseas Xavier Bartlett or Fergus O'Neill? 
    Yeah they've had one or two other back issues. A bit of a pickle for them really
    As much as you want the ashes to be Best vs Best this might just be the best thing for England in an ashes series since Mcgrath stepping on that ball in 2005. And given our luck with injuries for Ashes series in the last decade its about time something went our way!
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    I suppose the only difference between us and them is that they do have any number of other bowling options if it means giving Starc and Hazlewood a meaningful rest. In addition to Cummins' replacement and Lyon, they potentially have Webster and Green (who should be fit to bowl) as well as part-timers such as Head and Labuschagne.   
  • Sponsored links:



  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    /killerandflash said:
    Leuth said:
    You all say this like Pakistan aren't going to roll over for 50
    I'm feeling smug that I liked this comment, rather than LOLing it  :D


    You're both in a bit of trouble. Pakistan only need two runs and have four wickets in hand. 
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,017
    The Aussies might have to turn to Brendan Doggett or even Michael Nesser 
    Haven't seen much of Doggett bar the BBL but Neser would worry me , more than capable of batting 8 very comfortably too. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,734
    Australia win by 107 runs which is two less than the difference between the two sides, Beth Mooney, made.