One of the massive benefits of giving the likes of Jaydn, Ekansh, Dawkins and Curtiss these opportunities is that, because they have come from the same successful age group, when one does do well than the others will think "well if he can do it in the first team level then there is no reason why I can't". It's somewhat premature to think that they are all going to have long and successful careers at this level but, given how bereft of homegrown talent we have been in recent times, they've brought some definite hope.
One of the massive benefits of giving the likes of Jaydn, Ekansh, Dawkins and Curtiss these opportunities is that, because they have come from the same successful age group, when one does do well than the others will think "well if he can do it in the first team level then there is no reason why I can't". It's somewhat premature to think that they are all going to have long and successful careers at this level but, given how bereft of homegrown talent we have been in recent times, they've brought some definite hope.
They’ve added some interest to another awful season; finishing 18th is not a good look and we were dire in the metro bank , despite not losing many to the hundred . I guess their chances next season will depend if Crawley survives the Ashes intact and what happens with big Denly and Leaning this winter, given that Northeast and Compton and Evison are certain to play in the top 6/7. Would be interesting to know what Dawkins’ keeping is like . If Creepy is ditched, our batting looks strong , even without Denly/ Leaning.
One of the massive benefits of giving the likes of Jaydn, Ekansh, Dawkins and Curtiss these opportunities is that, because they have come from the same successful age group, when one does do well than the others will think "well if he can do it in the first team level then there is no reason why I can't". It's somewhat premature to think that they are all going to have long and successful careers at this level but, given how bereft of homegrown talent we have been in recent times, they've brought some definite hope.
They’ve added some interest to another awful season; finishing 18th is not a good look and we were dire in the metro bank , despite not losing many to the hundred . I guess their chances next season will depend if Crawley survives the Ashes intact and what happens with big Denly and Leaning this winter, given that Northeast and Compton and Evison are certain to play in the top 6/7. Would be interesting to know what Dawkins’ keeping is like . If Creepy is ditched, our batting looks strong , even without Denly/ Leaning.
With little Denly, Ekansh, Benjamin up our sleeves .
I agree that it does look like a strong batting unit. I'm not that Dawkins will be keeping well at least not in red ball but if we opt not to give Billings a contract then there is a chance he might do so in white ball.
The parallel with his batting style and physique, at 6' 4'' plus, means that he is, potentially, a clone of Crawley. The low centre of gravity for most keepers, especially standing up, is a big plus and the reason why we rarely, if ever, see in professional cricket keepers that tall - Gilchrist and Foakes, both at 6' 1'', are the tallest I can think of but the difference is that those two have always been regarded as keepers whereas with Kent 2s and England U19s Dawkins hasn't been taking the gloves. The first step would be for him to start doing so for the 2s next season.
Dawkins might get in the side as Crawley's replacement when the latter is away on England duty but, that said, there is no guarantee that he will sign another contract with us, at least not a long term one anyway. If and when he loses his England place, I'm not sure what the incentive for him, financially or otherwise, for him to remain with us in Div 2?
It would also be good for Jaydn and Ekansh to develop their bowling in the 2s too because a side can never have too many options. Ultimately and in two or three years time, having those two in the top seven plus Evison, would enable us to go in with an extra batter or three frontline seamers and a spinner / two of each.
Comments
Jaydn 55* (74)
Dawkins 35* (72)
Crawley
Compton
Northeast
Muyeye
BD
Finch/ Dawkins
Evison.
The parallel with his batting style and physique, at 6' 4'' plus, means that he is, potentially, a clone of Crawley. The low centre of gravity for most keepers, especially standing up, is a big plus and the reason why we rarely, if ever, see in professional cricket keepers that tall - Gilchrist and Foakes, both at 6' 1'', are the tallest I can think of but the difference is that those two have always been regarded as keepers whereas with Kent 2s and England U19s Dawkins hasn't been taking the gloves. The first step would be for him to start doing so for the 2s next season.
Dawkins might get in the side as Crawley's replacement when the latter is away on England duty but, that said, there is no guarantee that he will sign another contract with us, at least not a long term one anyway. If and when he loses his England place, I'm not sure what the incentive for him, financially or otherwise, for him to remain with us in Div 2?
It would also be good for Jaydn and Ekansh to develop their bowling in the 2s too because a side can never have too many options. Ultimately and in two or three years time, having those two in the top seven plus Evison, would enable us to go in with an extra batter or three frontline seamers and a spinner / two of each.
Jaydn 67* (100)
Ekansh 0* (4)
117-2 (31.2)
131-2 (38.2) for a lead of 140
Ekansh 5* (27)
Evison 8* (19)