Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Palace fans embarrassing themselves again

1…4950525455…57

Comments

  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 36,075
    Just read that not only were Palace dumped into the Conference league and therefore have to face a play off round, but Forest who got bumped up to the Europa do not have to face a play off.

    The play off games for Palace are in between PL games 1 and 2, and then 2 and 3. Which again benefits Forest who after a week of rest will play Palace in week 2. 
  • Guardy
    Guardy Posts: 64
    In summary…….fuck ‘em.
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 666
    ForeverAddickted said:
    CafcSCP said:
    Let’s hope they don’t get any Eastern European teams. They have proper ultras as opposed to a group of blokes that wear black and have a megaphone.
    Palace Ultra's will probably send a message via. their Mum's WhatsApp Group, advising no one to wear black, because when the Police start getting involved, they wont want their fans to get confused for the nasty Eastern European Ultras.
    When Millwall played in Hungary all them years back, apparently on one of the ferries back afterwards it kicked off between the spanners fans and a load of Belgian paratroopers. Can you imagine the Nigel's in the middle of that dust up? ⛴️  👊  🧑‍🦽
  • YTS1978
    YTS1978 Posts: 1,710
    MarcusH26 said:
    https://www.cpfc.co.uk/news/statement/crystal-palace-club-statement/

    Duchatalet esque statement 
    I've read that a couple of times now...absolute classic lol
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,372
    They got their arses kicked by the South Norwood Teddybear Play Group! Let alone a proper Eastern European firm
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,861
    soapy_jones said:
    They got their arses kicked by the South Norwood Teddybear Play Group! Let alone a proper Eastern European firm

    So would we!

    Scary Animal Plushs

  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,708

  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,916
    You’ve gotta laugh - the summer they should have been basking in the fa cup win they’ve been fretting and protesting about this - I haven’t followed it so don’t know how unjust it is or not but rules are rules so they should have appealed, sucked it up and treated any reversal as an unexpected bonus - and concentrated on winning the thing they are now in - they’ve compounded their mistake and took the shine off their cup win - badly handled 
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,324
    Bring back flags ffs

  • Sponsored links:



  • Croydon
    Croydon Posts: 12,741
    Who wears gold with a stainless steel watch 
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,372
    Friend Or Defoe said:
    Behold, the first ever Charity Shield tattoo!


    Didn't know Mr T had vitiligo...
  • Dave2l
    Dave2l Posts: 8,877
    "Hi tattooist from South London. Can I have a tattoo of a charity shield on my stomach" 

    ......

    "Hi Nigel, take a seat...someone will be with you shortly".

    Calls mental health 

    "It's me again, that nutter nigel now wants a charity shield tattoo. Can you come and get him sectioned"
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,112
    Croydon said:
    Who wears gold with a stainless steel watch 
    You live there!
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 666
    Friend Or Defoe said:
    Behold, the first ever Charity Shield tattoo!


    Plenty of space on that belly for a few more trophy wins 🏆 
  • Solidgone
    Solidgone Posts: 10,219
    Friend Or Defoe said:
    Behold, the first ever Charity Shield tattoo!


    I don’t see one tattoo mentioning the Glaciers…disgraceful to just erase their history. Must be a plastic fan with serious mental problems.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,931
    Scraped a 1-0 win in the home leg of their playoff game, so work to do in the second leg.
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,976
    Friend Or Defoe said:
    Behold, the first ever Charity Shield tattoo!


    Even he won't put 1861 on there.
  • Athletico Charlton
    Athletico Charlton Posts: 14,289
    killerandflash said:
    Scraped a 1-0 win in the home leg of their playoff game, so work to do in the second leg.
    Good. Have to keep putting their first team out for all games to scrape through until being beaten by some European non entity.
  • Bod
    Bod Posts: 180
    North Lower Neil said:
    Friend Or Defoe said:
    Behold, the first ever Charity Shield tattoo!


    Even he won't put 1861 on there.
    Sums up this artificial club in pot belly shaped nutshell.
    Utter utter cnuts.  I work (unfortunately) with a Prolapse fan and he sums up your average Nigel to a t.
    One of the weirdest people I've ever met. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • cfgs
    cfgs Posts: 11,488
    edited August 25
    FA to investigate Marinakis banner at Palace match - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c5y0zg3n4x8o

    Not only embarrassing themselves, but now they may be about to get their club in trouble.  Which will lead to them being unable to do their arts and crafts workshop as much.
  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,233
    cfgs said:
    FA to investigate Marinakis banner at Palace match - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c5y0zg3n4x8o

    Not only embarrassing themselves, but now they may be about their club in trouble.  Which will lead to them being unable to do their arts and crafts workshop as much.
    Club deserves to get in trouble. They are the ones who authorised a banner that size to be allowed in the ground. 
  • Kinsella87
    Kinsella87 Posts: 470
    edited September 14
    C***y
    Runty
    Young
    Shithead
    Tosspot
    Asshole
    Lovers

    Pissing off
    All
    Legitamate
    Anaorak
    Celebraters
    Everywhere
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 666
    edited September 14
    Kinsella87 said:
    C***y
    Runty
    Young
    Shithead
    Tosspot
    Asshole
    Lovers

    Pissing off
    All
    Legitamate
    Anaorak
    Celebraters
    Everywhere
    Thought the first list was a new adult version of the seven dwarfs for a second
  • JustFloydRoad
    JustFloydRoad Posts: 1,649
    edited August 25
    Do they want to be the new Millwall or something?
  • JustFloydRoad
    JustFloydRoad Posts: 1,649
    edited August 25
    cfgs said:
    FA to investigate Marinakis banner at Palace match - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c5y0zg3n4x8o

    Not only embarrassing themselves, but now they may be about to get their club in trouble.  Which will lead to them being unable to do their arts and crafts workshop as much.
    I'd fine Parish for insighting the crowd and deduct ten points because.....

    Looking forward to their club statement Rubbing Hands Emoji
  • JohnnyJoeyDeeDee
    JohnnyJoeyDeeDee Posts: 1,043
    My initial knee jerk reaction to all things Palarse is to dislike them, but having seen that banner -come  on it’s funny and the Forest owner is a total wrong ‘un. 
  • cfgs
    cfgs Posts: 11,488
    JohnnyJoeyDeeDee said:
    My initial knee jerk reaction to all things Palarse is to dislike them, but having seen that banner -come  on it’s funny and the Forest owner is a total wrong ‘un. 
    But if you allow that it will encourage other banners, which you might not agree with.
  • JohnnyJoeyDeeDee
    JohnnyJoeyDeeDee Posts: 1,043
    cfgs said:
    JohnnyJoeyDeeDee said:
    My initial knee jerk reaction to all things Palarse is to dislike them, but having seen that banner -come  on it’s funny and the Forest owner is a total wrong ‘un. 
    But if you allow that it will encourage other banners, which you might not agree with.
    Personally I wouldn’t allow political banners e.g. ‘Gooners for Starmer’ or ‘Nigels for Nigel’, but plenty of clubs have banners against an owner, manager or Chief Executive, although it’s usually against their own. Is it defamatory? Its intention potentially is. Still found it funny
  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,233
    edited August 25
    JohnnyJoeyDeeDee said:
    cfgs said:
    JohnnyJoeyDeeDee said:
    My initial knee jerk reaction to all things Palarse is to dislike them, but having seen that banner -come  on it’s funny and the Forest owner is a total wrong ‘un. 
    But if you allow that it will encourage other banners, which you might not agree with.
    Personally I wouldn’t allow political banners e.g. ‘Gooners for Starmer’ or ‘Nigels for Nigel’, but plenty of clubs have banners against an owner, manager or Chief Executive, although it’s usually against their own. Is it defamatory? Its intention potentially is. Still found it funny
    Not sure what's funny about depicting an owner putting a gun to head of a player, but everyone's sense of humour is different I guess. 

Categories

“Marketplace”