Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Reebok it is then (new 3rd shirt p51)

1…5051535556…58

Comments

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,839
    se9addick said:
    ShootersHillGuru said:
    I quite like it but a serious question. Why pick what is undoubtedly a national shirt (Jamaica) and what made us choose Jamaica ? I know we’ve got a few Jamaicans in the squad now and the connection with a Jamaican football club but it still seems to me to be strange to be so overtly leaning towards one nationality. 
    Would be a bit of a mess if they tried to create a shirt that includes all the nations of the world!

    South east London has a massive Jamaican community and we have a fair few Jamaican national team players in our squad. And Larry’s sells rum punch in Crossbars.
    The number of Jamaicans in the borough of Greenwich is relatively low though, when compared to some other boroughs. Nigerians are probably the largest non white group now
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    fenaddick said:
    The Red Robin said:
    Would be nice for the club to get the full kit in these promos. 
    I think that's probably a Reebok decision as a lof of the other clobber is Reebok stuff that they want to sell
    I get it, but could do both. 
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 6,846
    AberystwythAddick said:
    SporadicAddick said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    Braziliance said:
    This is a bit of a personal win for me. I don't like any of our new kits, so that's some £'s saved, unless they are heavily reduced near the end of the season, and the majority seem to like them so should sell well. 

    I'm just amazed that a company that is meant to specialise in design and clothing is doing worse jobs than concept art whacked up by a Charlton fan. I would have bought all 3 if @Nug was the one designing them. 
    It’s stupid to compare them. One was following a brief set by the club, the other did what they wanted. 

    The Reebok have made three designs that follow the clubs design visions which have also been well regarded by lots of people. 
    I’d love to know what the clubs “design visions” are. 

    I’m not sure the club has an in house design team sitting on bean bags wearing Birkenstocks and “ideating”.

    far more likely that Reebok made design suggestions that the club approved.
    Every club give the suppliers a brief of what is desired. The supplier then comes back. You don’t need a design team to inform a supplier what you want 
    “Hello Reebok. We definitely need a red one. Other than that, we can have yellow, blue, black or green and purple. Thoughts appreciated.

    cheers

    Charlton”
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    edited August 4
    killerandflash said:
    se9addick said:
    ShootersHillGuru said:
    I quite like it but a serious question. Why pick what is undoubtedly a national shirt (Jamaica) and what made us choose Jamaica ? I know we’ve got a few Jamaicans in the squad now and the connection with a Jamaican football club but it still seems to me to be strange to be so overtly leaning towards one nationality. 
    Would be a bit of a mess if they tried to create a shirt that includes all the nations of the world!

    South east London has a massive Jamaican community and we have a fair few Jamaican national team players in our squad. And Larry’s sells rum punch in Crossbars.
    The number of Jamaicans in the borough of Greenwich is relatively low though, when compared to some other boroughs. Nigerians are probably the largest non white group now
    Tricky to measure as Nigerian has its own category on the ONS at 5%, whereas Jamaican will fall under 'Caribbean', which is also split into multiple different categories, e.g. Black British Caribbean, Black Caribbean, multi/mixed-ethnicity Caribbean, which is around 7% - obviously not all will be Jamaican/Jamaican heritage there.
  • Gribbo
    Gribbo Posts: 8,482
    SporadicAddick said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    SporadicAddick said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    Braziliance said:
    This is a bit of a personal win for me. I don't like any of our new kits, so that's some £'s saved, unless they are heavily reduced near the end of the season, and the majority seem to like them so should sell well. 

    I'm just amazed that a company that is meant to specialise in design and clothing is doing worse jobs than concept art whacked up by a Charlton fan. I would have bought all 3 if @Nug was the one designing them. 
    It’s stupid to compare them. One was following a brief set by the club, the other did what they wanted. 

    The Reebok have made three designs that follow the clubs design visions which have also been well regarded by lots of people. 
    I’d love to know what the clubs “design visions” are. 

    I’m not sure the club has an in house design team sitting on bean bags wearing Birkenstocks and “ideating”.

    far more likely that Reebok made design suggestions that the club approved.
    Every club give the suppliers a brief of what is desired. The supplier then comes back. You don’t need a design team to inform a supplier what you want 
    “Hello Reebok. We definitely need a red one. Other than that, we can have yellow, blue, black or green and purple. Thoughts appreciated.

    cheers

    Charlton”
    Reckon you could do with running your emails through ChatGPT, Sporo. Just to polish em up a bit
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    When are they going to sort that online shop out? It's horrendous to navigate and half the stuff is missing or not in logical sections. 
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,159
    The Red Robin said:
    When are they going to sort that online shop out? It's horrendous to navigate and half the stuff is missing or not in logical sections. 
    I hate the weird flashing tabs screaming 'Come back! Don't leave me! Buy this tat!' it has when you click onto another tab. Absolutely no desire to continue seeing what's on the club shop site if it's going to be a needy prick about it
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,619
    I just don’t get why we’ve chosen to pick on one nationality. Not suggesting we needed to go for an all inclusive nations shirt as SE9 kindly posted but I find what we’ve done a bit odd. Nice shirt but as far as I remember SE7 is not in Kingston. There are plenty of ethnic groups in SE London that rival Jamaica in numbers.
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,833
    Don’t read the social media posts, but have they said it’s in reference to Jamaica or is it we are just using those colours? 

    No one says the blue and white kit is a nod to Finland 
  • Mendonca In Asdas
    Mendonca In Asdas Posts: 22,650
    The Red Robin said:
    When are they going to sort that online shop out? It's horrendous to navigate and half the stuff is missing or not in logical sections. 
    The new goalies top is meant to be on sale at 11:00 am , does someone need to push a button, as its not there?
  • Sponsored links:



  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 10,986
    MrOneLung said:
    Don’t read the social media posts, but have they said it’s in reference to Jamaica or is it we are just using those colours? 

    No one says the blue and white kit is a nod to Finland 
    They haven’t explicitly but it’s pretty obvious 
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,031
    ShootersHillGuru said:
    I just don’t get why we’ve chosen to pick on one nationality. Not suggesting we needed to go for an all inclusive nations shirt as SE9 kindly posted but I find what we’ve done a bit odd. Nice shirt but as far as I remember SE7 is not in Kingston. There are plenty of ethnic groups in SE London that rival Jamaica in numbers.
    Do we have four of their international players playing for us?
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,346
    I'd much rather wear @Nug's design. 
  • Nug
    Nug Posts: 4,623
    ShootersHillGuru said:
    I just don’t get why we’ve chosen to pick on one nationality. Not suggesting we needed to go for an all inclusive nations shirt as SE9 kindly posted but I find what we’ve done a bit odd. Nice shirt but as far as I remember SE7 is not in Kingston. There are plenty of ethnic groups in SE London that rival Jamaica in numbers.
    I expect this has Charlie Methven’s fingerprints all over this. Wasn’t he the one who set up the tie in with the team over there. Based on watching the Sunderland documentary this is exactly the sort of thing he’d throw his weight into. I don’t think the reasoning is deeper than that. A 3rd kit is a bit of a free hit and it’s definitely aimed at a young urban market. I reckon it will be massively popular.
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,725
    I like it a lot. Better than the second kit
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,757
    I like it a lot. Big fan.
  • SteveACS
    SteveACS Posts: 372
    MrOneLung said:
    Don’t read the social media posts, but have they said it’s in reference to Jamaica or is it we are just using those colours? 

    No one says the blue and white kit is a nod to Finland 
    Don't forget, we have a tie up with a club based in Jamaica. It's more likely to have something to do with that, than us having 4 Jamaican internationals in the squad..
  • CL_Phantom
    CL_Phantom Posts: 5,512
    It's alright, think expectations went through the roof so seems a little bit of a let down.

    The away might just edge it for me.
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 6,846
    edited August 4
    I think all three kits are horrible.

    Reebok are trying far too hard, as are the club.

    And we don’t need a third kit.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,288
    edited August 4
    I like it... But think Plymouth's rendition of the Jamaica kit from last season looks slightly better... If that's what we were going for. 


  • Sponsored links:



  • Pavoren007
    Pavoren007 Posts: 2,518
    Reebok need to get @nug a consultancy gig for next season. Reebok are on a better track vs Castore for sure BUT Nug’s designs warm to us fans more. Tweaks on a theme which work better.

    Nevertheless, I will buy the 3rd. 
  • letthegoodtimesroll
    letthegoodtimesroll Posts: 10,615
    I quite like that 3rd kit. Definitely needs a Desmond Dekker song adapted for the Charlton Aces…

    I’ll start, 

    get up every match day,
    slaving for the Reds sir
    so that every Charlton fan can sing…
    Come on, Up The Addicks, ah

    and repeat


  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 601
    SporadicAddick said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    SporadicAddick said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    Braziliance said:
    This is a bit of a personal win for me. I don't like any of our new kits, so that's some £'s saved, unless they are heavily reduced near the end of the season, and the majority seem to like them so should sell well. 

    I'm just amazed that a company that is meant to specialise in design and clothing is doing worse jobs than concept art whacked up by a Charlton fan. I would have bought all 3 if @Nug was the one designing them. 
    It’s stupid to compare them. One was following a brief set by the club, the other did what they wanted. 

    The Reebok have made three designs that follow the clubs design visions which have also been well regarded by lots of people. 
    I’d love to know what the clubs “design visions” are. 

    I’m not sure the club has an in house design team sitting on bean bags wearing Birkenstocks and “ideating”.

    far more likely that Reebok made design suggestions that the club approved.
    Every club give the suppliers a brief of what is desired. The supplier then comes back. You don’t need a design team to inform a supplier what you want 
    “Hello Reebok. We definitely need a red one. Other than that, we can have yellow, blue, black or green and purple. Thoughts appreciated.

    cheers

    Charlton”
    Red or Orange?
  • Croydon
    Croydon Posts: 12,725
    Braziliance said:

    The logo on this looks like those memes on twitter "for every like I'll make Ronaldo fatter". Why is it so big?
  • Bod
    Bod Posts: 177
    Yes - whomever allowed that logo through at that size needs to be spoken to most sternly, it's ridiculous.
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 3,283
    MrOneLung said:
    Don’t read the social media posts, but have they said it’s in reference to Jamaica or is it we are just using those colours? 

    No one says the blue and white kit is a nod to Finland 
    I thought it was a nod to our Scottish 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 players 
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,982
    ShootersHillGuru said:
    I quite like it but a serious question. Why pick what is undoubtedly a national shirt (Jamaica) and what made us choose Jamaica ? I know we’ve got a few Jamaicans in the squad now and the connection with a Jamaican football club but it still seems to me to be strange to be so overtly leaning towards one nationality. 
    I was presuming it's an attempt to appeal to the local community in order to boost our attendances, especially as RBG are doing their best to deter our historic fan base. 
  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 13,914
    Still no kits for 5/6/7 year olds, how has the same mistake been made on all 3 kits ? 
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,982
    Braziliance said:

    The shirt is good, but not keen on the shorts.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 10,986
    shine166 said:
    Still no kits for 5/6/7 year olds, how has the same mistake been made on all 3 kits ? 
    Presumably the orders all happened at the same time 

Categories

“Marketplace”