Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Reebok it is then (new 3rd shirt p51)

15253545658

Comments

  • Lurker
    Lurker Posts: 407
    The RSK Logo looks cheap on all of them, if there was an easy way to remove it, I'd probably buy the away.  

    I suppose washing it a few times might do the job.. 
  • NorthbyEast
    NorthbyEast Posts: 85

    Lurker said:
    The RSK Logo looks cheap on all of them, if there was an easy way to remove it, I'd probably buy the away.  

    I suppose washing it a few times might do the job.. 
    The K is starting to go on my son's shirt so perhaps that is the way to go.

  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,159
    I hated the Nike shirts. As bad as I think these Reebok ones have been at least they're bespoke. All the Nike ones we got were catalogue kits and at least two of them were kits that Man City had had a few years previously. I think the period of 12/13-14/15 might be our worst ever run of home kits, the 15/16 away kit was a Palace kit and you could just feel the lack of interest and regard Nike had for giving us anything other than a list of kits that you could buy for your Sunday League side that they would slap a badge on. As much as I don't rate Castore as a company, they've turned out some of the nicer kits in recent memory.
  • Gribbo
    Gribbo Posts: 8,482
    Got to ne honest - the more I see this kit on social media etc, the more I'm going off of it.
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,159
    Gribbo said:
    Got to ne honest - the more I see this kit on social media etc, the more I'm going off of it.
    I agree, I was just thinking that this third kit is going to age really badly. I went through some of our previous kits to today's and I am already rolling my eyes as I get to this new one. Gimmick kits can be divisive at the best of times but they almost always end up being mystifying a few years down the line
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,555
    Whoever designs next year's kits really needs to get @Nug involved.
  • daveydanger
    daveydanger Posts: 1,338
    I wish we’d gone a little bit more retro/classic with the designs. When I think of Reebok, it evokes 1990s fashion - my favourite pair of Reebok Classic trainers, gelled French crops, giant billowing shirts worn by Michael Owen.

    I got quite excited when I saw some of the recent football “fashion” shirts that Reebok had produced. The patterns and fit are a bit bonkers but I’d love a CAFC shirt in that throwback style. I guess they’ve decided to go down a more modern, “technical” route with these designs, and the kids will love them - fair enough!



  • eaststandmike
    eaststandmike Posts: 14,956
    Gribbo said:
    Got to ne honest - the more I see this kit on social media etc, the more I'm going off of it.
    I was never really on it, why do we need a shirt that represents Jamaica more than the club.
  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,484
    Gribbo said:
    Got to ne honest - the more I see this kit on social media etc, the more I'm going off of it.
    I was never really on it, why do we need a shirt that represents Jamaica more than the club.
    It's a third kit (doesn't really matter what they do with them) and for one season.
  • Lordflashheart
    Lordflashheart Posts: 5,619
    Away and 3rd kit are both awful 
  • Sponsored links:



  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,030
    I hated the Nike shirts. As bad as I think these Reebok ones have been at least they're bespoke. All the Nike ones we got were catalogue kits and at least two of them were kits that Man City had had a few years previously. I think the period of 12/13-14/15 might be our worst ever run of home kits, the 15/16 away kit was a Palace kit and you could just feel the lack of interest and regard Nike had for giving us anything other than a list of kits that you could buy for your Sunday League side that they would slap a badge on. As much as I don't rate Castore as a company, they've turned out some of the nicer kits in recent memory.
    I wasn’t a massive fan of the Nike kits, but this is my favourite home kit in decades


  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,484
    se9addick said:
    I hated the Nike shirts. As bad as I think these Reebok ones have been at least they're bespoke. All the Nike ones we got were catalogue kits and at least two of them were kits that Man City had had a few years previously. I think the period of 12/13-14/15 might be our worst ever run of home kits, the 15/16 away kit was a Palace kit and you could just feel the lack of interest and regard Nike had for giving us anything other than a list of kits that you could buy for your Sunday League side that they would slap a badge on. As much as I don't rate Castore as a company, they've turned out some of the nicer kits in recent memory.
    I wasn’t a massive fan of the Nike kits, but this is my favourite home kit in decades


    Comfortably the best of the Nike's
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    The red Hummel 1992 tribute special is probably our best red shirt. 
  • Leeds_Addick
    Leeds_Addick Posts: 4,698
    The red Hummel 1992 tribute special is probably our best red shirt. 
    Hummel did a good job of the shirts but the club shop around that time was terrible iirc

    The Nike shirts were generally bad with the exception of that one with the colour above - the quality of that shirt was pretty good as well I think. And I think the badges were still embroidered.

    For what it's worth I think this seasons Reebok kits look absolutely awful but it's the poor quality of them that puts me off buying more than anything else.

    Luckily the shirts from 20 years ago have survived so I can still wear them. I don't think the same will be said for the Reebok kits in 2045.
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,241
    se9addick said:
    I hated the Nike shirts. As bad as I think these Reebok ones have been at least they're bespoke. All the Nike ones we got were catalogue kits and at least two of them were kits that Man City had had a few years previously. I think the period of 12/13-14/15 might be our worst ever run of home kits, the 15/16 away kit was a Palace kit and you could just feel the lack of interest and regard Nike had for giving us anything other than a list of kits that you could buy for your Sunday League side that they would slap a badge on. As much as I don't rate Castore as a company, they've turned out some of the nicer kits in recent memory.
    I wasn’t a massive fan of the Nike kits, but this is my favourite home kit in decades



  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 3,283
    sam3110 said:
    se9addick said:
    I hated the Nike shirts. As bad as I think these Reebok ones have been at least they're bespoke. All the Nike ones we got were catalogue kits and at least two of them were kits that Man City had had a few years previously. I think the period of 12/13-14/15 might be our worst ever run of home kits, the 15/16 away kit was a Palace kit and you could just feel the lack of interest and regard Nike had for giving us anything other than a list of kits that you could buy for your Sunday League side that they would slap a badge on. As much as I don't rate Castore as a company, they've turned out some of the nicer kits in recent memory.
    I wasn’t a massive fan of the Nike kits, but this is my favourite home kit in decades



    Vile
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    What are the training tops this year like?
  • sam3110 said:
    Moan time .. I don't like either of the new away kits, they look cheap and tatty 
    I wish we had stayed with Castore and (much earlier) Nike .. their shirts were well designed and of good quality
    Nike well designed?! One was just a red polo shirt that was 6 shades too dark, another one was a kit that many lauded as the worst home kit with had in a while, possibly ever! 


    Controversial but I really like this shirt and still wear it 
  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 9,748
    Introducing our 2025/26 third goalkeeper shirt 🧤


    A third goalkeeper! 
    A second at free kicks and penalties could be a good strategy but three is too many imo. I can’t see this shirt getting used.
  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,484
    edited August 7
    Introducing our 2025/26 third goalkeeper shirt 🧤


    A third goalkeeper! 
    A second at free kicks and penalties could be a good strategy but three is too many imo. I can’t see this shirt getting used.
    Edit
    I will read the post properly next time 
    I will read the post properly next time 
    I will read the post properly next time 
  • Sponsored links:



  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,030
    Redhenry said:
    Looking at that list objectively, I actually think it might be this weekends opponents who have the nicest home shirt in the Championship this year. 
  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 9,748
    Redhenry said:
    Saw that yesterday.  Some nice kits there but I accidentally voted for Bristol City. 
  • se9addick said:
    Redhenry said:
    Looking at that list objectively, I actually think it might be this weekends opponents who have the nicest home shirt in the Championship this year. 
    On the article they show Watford's as a sponsor free shirt. It's an abomination of a shirt with the sponsor on it. 
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 15,808
    Derby and Norwich both have decent kits
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 3,283
    Middlesborough and Wrexham’s look like Rugby shirts
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,839
    https://www.charltonafc.com/news/charlton-athletic-announce-christopher-ward-partnership

    Watch brand Christopher Ward are our sleeve sponsor, but due to the "busy" design of the home shirt, it's really hard to read, which seems a bit of a fail commercially.


  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,484
    https://www.charltonafc.com/news/charlton-athletic-announce-christopher-ward-partnership

    Watch brand Christopher Ward are our sleeve sponsor, but due to the "busy" design of the home shirt, it's really hard to read, which seems a bit of a fail commercially.


    The black splodges show through as well 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 10,986
    Maybe I’m wrong but I’m not convinced the sponsor is actually on those shirts and it’s been photoshopped on after 
  • cfgs
    cfgs Posts: 11,476
    I thought QPR were sponsored by Crapybet at first glance.