Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2025

1…3031333536…207

Comments

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,514
    edited June 2025
    50* (66) for Duckett

    Crawley 31* (67)

    87-0 (22)

    284 required off 74 overs 
  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,942
    I know England are just as guilty, but this ball change nonsense does my head in. Just get on with it ffs
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,871
    Really enjoy watching Duckett. 
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,630
    100 partnership between Crawley and Duckett
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,468
    India are currently favourites, according to WinViz. You wouldn't guess that by looking at the slumped-shoulder body language of the widely-spaced fielders. 
  • PrincessFiona
    PrincessFiona Posts: 5,527
    Chizz said:
    India are currently favourites, according to WinViz. You wouldn't guess that by looking at the slumped-shoulder body language of the widely-spaced fielders. 
    what are the current %s?
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,468
    PrincessFiona said:
    Chizz said:
    India are currently favourites, according to WinViz. You wouldn't guess that by looking at the slumped-shoulder body language of the widely-spaced fielders. 
    what are the current %s?
    India 47%, England a bit less
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,630
    Bumrah back into the attack for 20 mins before lunch
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 36,303
    Is WinViz ever accurate? It could just be me but i feel like they're usually out by a fair bit.

    @Addick Addict you bet on cricket on lot, how accurate would you say the odds on WinViz are compared to the actual betting odds?
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 13,575
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Is WinViz ever accurate? It could just be me but i feel like they're usually out by a fair bit.

    @Addick Addict you bet on cricket on lot, how accurate would you say the odds on WinViz are compared to the actual betting odds?
    I would say it’s largely pointless in tests as there are so many variables. It seems more accurate for T20 & one day games which makes more sense as things are more comparable 

  • Sponsored links:



  • PrincessFiona
    PrincessFiona Posts: 5,527
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Is WinViz ever accurate? It could just be me but i feel like they're usually out by a fair bit.

    @Addick Addict you bet on cricket on lot, how accurate would you say the odds on WinViz are compared to the actual betting odds?
    It seems to vary a lot. Sometimes it seems reasonable then on others it is way out
  • PrincessFiona
    PrincessFiona Posts: 5,527
    edited June 2025
    Pelling1993 said:
    I know England are just as guilty, but this ball change nonsense does my head in. Just get on with it ffs
    I think asking again after only one more delivery is ridiculous. Maybe limit how soon they can ask again?
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,468
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Is WinViz ever accurate? It could just be me but i feel like they're usually out by a fair bit.

    @Addick Addict you bet on cricket on lot, how accurate would you say the odds on WinViz are compared to the actual betting odds?
    WinViz is completely accurate, but it isn't in any way a prediction. It's just a statistical summary of the current position in the game, compared to every other game played. So, all things being equal, if one team is quoted as 47% likely to win, it just means that of all matches where a team is in a similar position, 47% of those teams won. 
  • Addickted2TheReds
    Addickted2TheReds Posts: 7,783
    I'll give you all 100 words.

    Please explain to me how this isn't the best sport in the world?
  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,942
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Is WinViz ever accurate? It could just be me but i feel like they're usually out by a fair bit.

    @Addick Addict you bet on cricket on lot, how accurate would you say the odds on WinViz are compared to the actual betting odds?
    I think WinViz is based off a lot of historical data. 4th innings run chases over 250 were very rare until more recent times, so I guess the figures are slightly skewed.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 13,575
    Siraj really is a tosser
  • bolloxbolder
    bolloxbolder Posts: 8,057
    edited June 2025
    Oh just fuck off to lunch, Siraj, you complete Mr Idiot!
  • jakecafc
    jakecafc Posts: 2,127
    41% for both teams on winviz now.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,630
    117-0 off 30 overs at lunch. 96 runs in the session.

    India need 10 wickets, England need 254 runs.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,543
    Addickted2TheReds said:
    I'll give you all 100 words.

    Please explain to me how this isn't the best sport in the world?
    Some of us knew exactly how this would play out tbf :p

  • Sponsored links:



  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 36,303
    Get through the next session only a couple of wickets down and then it's bazball time surely?
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,448
    edited June 2025
    blackpool72 said:
    I hope that when play begins today that we don't go full Bazball ( I hate  that expression) from the off.
    Play normal cricket for the 1st session and then reassess at lunch.
    If we are say 3 wickets down by lunch then play sensible and go for the draw.
    If we find ourselves 120 without loss then have a go, but this is a 5 match series and a draw here with some of our best bowlers missing is not a bad result. 
    117 without loss. Not bad eh!
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,514
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Is WinViz ever accurate? It could just be me but i feel like they're usually out by a fair bit.

    @Addick Addict you bet on cricket on lot, how accurate would you say the odds on WinViz are compared to the actual betting odds?
    It's a guide but not as accurate as one would expect simply because it isn't skewed to take into account certain current tendencies or the circumstances of the game itself. Current market:

    England 1.53 (65%)
    India 5.8 (17%)
    Draw 5.6 (18%)
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,939
    cantersaddick said:
    blackpool72 said:
    I hope that when play begins today that we don't go full Bazball ( I hate  that expression) from the off.
    Play normal cricket for the 1st session and then reassess at lunch.
    If we are say 3 wickets down by lunch then play sensible and go for the draw.
    If we find ourselves 120 without loss then have a go, but this is a 5 match series and a draw here with some of our best bowlers missing is not a bad result. 
    117 without loss. Not bad eh!
    Us Surrey boys know our cricket 😁
  • Addickted2TheReds
    Addickted2TheReds Posts: 7,783
    blackpool72 said:
    cantersaddick said:
    blackpool72 said:
    I hope that when play begins today that we don't go full Bazball ( I hate  that expression) from the off.
    Play normal cricket for the 1st session and then reassess at lunch.
    If we are say 3 wickets down by lunch then play sensible and go for the draw.
    If we find ourselves 120 without loss then have a go, but this is a 5 match series and a draw here with some of our best bowlers missing is not a bad result. 
    117 without loss. Not bad eh!
    Us Surrey boys know our cricket 😁
    Guilty by association. Piss off @cantersaddick
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 13,575
    Raining in Leeds
  • Addickted2TheReds
    Addickted2TheReds Posts: 7,783
    5 minutes to go...
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 13,575
    fenaddick said:
    Raining in Leeds
    Covers back off 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,514
    50* (111) for Crawley. A very unlike Bazball Crawley too. One that is, more often that not, showing the full face of the bat, not playing across his pads and not throwing the kitchen sink at everything. Long may that continue. 
  • Addickted2TheReds
    Addickted2TheReds Posts: 7,783
    Cricket is 10x the sport football is but Charlton results are comfortably the thing I care about most in terms of sport. Anyone else or am I weird?

Categories

“Marketplace”