India are currently favourites, according to WinViz. You wouldn't guess that by looking at the slumped-shoulder body language of the widely-spaced fielders.
India are currently favourites, according to WinViz. You wouldn't guess that by looking at the slumped-shoulder body language of the widely-spaced fielders.
India are currently favourites, according to WinViz. You wouldn't guess that by looking at the slumped-shoulder body language of the widely-spaced fielders.
Is WinViz ever accurate? It could just be me but i feel like they're usually out by a fair bit.
@Addick Addict you bet on cricket on lot, how accurate would you say the odds on WinViz are compared to the actual betting odds?
I would say it’s largely pointless in tests as there are so many variables. It seems more accurate for T20 & one day games which makes more sense as things are more comparable
Is WinViz ever accurate? It could just be me but i feel like they're usually out by a fair bit.
@Addick Addict you bet on cricket on lot, how accurate would you say the odds on WinViz are compared to the actual betting odds?
WinViz is completely accurate, but it isn't in any way a prediction. It's just a statistical summary of the current position in the game, compared to every other game played. So, all things being equal, if one team is quoted as 47% likely to win, it just means that of all matches where a team is in a similar position, 47% of those teams won.
Is WinViz ever accurate? It could just be me but i feel like they're usually out by a fair bit.
@Addick Addict you bet on cricket on lot, how accurate would you say the odds on WinViz are compared to the actual betting odds?
I think WinViz is based off a lot of historical data. 4th innings run chases over 250 were very rare until more recent times, so I guess the figures are slightly skewed.
I hope that when play begins today that we don't go full Bazball ( I hate that expression) from the off. Play normal cricket for the 1st session and then reassess at lunch. If we are say 3 wickets down by lunch then play sensible and go for the draw. If we find ourselves 120 without loss then have a go, but this is a 5 match series and a draw here with some of our best bowlers missing is not a bad result.
Is WinViz ever accurate? It could just be me but i feel like they're usually out by a fair bit.
@Addick Addict you bet on cricket on lot, how accurate would you say the odds on WinViz are compared to the actual betting odds?
It's a guide but not as accurate as one would expect simply because it isn't skewed to take into account certain current tendencies or the circumstances of the game itself. Current market:
I hope that when play begins today that we don't go full Bazball ( I hate that expression) from the off. Play normal cricket for the 1st session and then reassess at lunch. If we are say 3 wickets down by lunch then play sensible and go for the draw. If we find ourselves 120 without loss then have a go, but this is a 5 match series and a draw here with some of our best bowlers missing is not a bad result.
I hope that when play begins today that we don't go full Bazball ( I hate that expression) from the off. Play normal cricket for the 1st session and then reassess at lunch. If we are say 3 wickets down by lunch then play sensible and go for the draw. If we find ourselves 120 without loss then have a go, but this is a 5 match series and a draw here with some of our best bowlers missing is not a bad result.
50* (111) for Crawley. A very unlike Bazball Crawley too. One that is, more often that not, showing the full face of the bat, not playing across his pads and not throwing the kitchen sink at everything. Long may that continue.
Comments
Crawley 31* (67)
87-0 (22)
284 required off 74 overs
@Addick Addict you bet on cricket on lot, how accurate would you say the odds on WinViz are compared to the actual betting odds?
Please explain to me how this isn't the best sport in the world?
India need 10 wickets, England need 254 runs.
England 1.53 (65%)
India 5.8 (17%)
Draw 5.6 (18%)