Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sponsors wanted for 25/26 season

clive
clive Posts: 19,464
in General Charlton

Looking ahead to the 2025/26 season, the club are opening new sponsorship and partnership opportunities for businesses looking to align with a club built on ambition, community, and a proud footballing history.

The latest sponsorship brochure outlines a range of opportunities, from high-profile kit sponsorships and stadium branding to digital activations and hospitality partnerships. Whether you're looking to enhance brand visibility, engage with Charlton's loyal fanbase, or create memorable experiences, the club have options to suit your objectives.

Click here to view the club's 2025/26 commercial brochure.

https://www.charltonafc.com/news/sponsorship-opportunities-open-202526

«1345678

Comments

  • cookierules
    cookierules Posts: 244
    Naming Rights…….👎🏻
  • CAFCBill
    CAFCBill Posts: 398
    How does everyone feel about them selling naming rights to the Valley? Seems like they might be trying to do that unless I have misread the brochure
  • LoOkOuT
    LoOkOuT Posts: 10,857
    I’m okay with them selling naming rights to any company called The Valley.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,338
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,037
    Feels slightly disingenuous to have such a central focus of this document be on the Community Trust or am I wrong?
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,040
    Hate the idea of Naming Rights to the ground being sold. Am surprised it's even being considered. 
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,037
    MarcusH26 said:
    Hate the idea of Naming Rights to the ground being sold. Am surprised it's even being considered. 
    I would assume any business which loses an astronomical amount of money every year will consider any and all revenue streams, in fact it would be fiscally irresponsible not to. Doesn’t mean they actually have to do it unless someone makes a ridiculous offer. 
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,355
    LoOkOuT said:
    I’m okay with them selling naming rights to any company called The Valley.
    The Valley Valley has an echo to it!
  • BigRedEvil
    BigRedEvil Posts: 11,071
    Naming rights doesn't really bother me, loads of clubs do it. It's still The Valley and always will be, obviously would prefer they didn't but I suppose if it brings in extra revenue to sign the next Charlie Kirk or McGrandles then who are we to complain? 
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,149
    sweat the asset but let's be honest the asset is complete wank outside the prem to non Charlton fans 
  • Sponsored links:



  • charlton4ever
    charlton4ever Posts: 1,717
    edited February 20
    As long as "The Valley" still appears in any naming, I don't have an issue. We need as much money coming in as we can get.
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,748
    CAFCBill said:
    How does everyone feel about them selling naming rights to the Valley? Seems like they might be trying to do that unless I have misread the brochure
    I'm quite superficial in the fact that if it's for megabucks and gets the team promoted then fine ( as long as The Valley is still in the name) but if it's for a couple of hundred grand and we get called The Tough Sheet Valley then bollocks to that. 


  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,288
    Have no issue with them getting a sponsor for the west stand, but the ground name shouldn’t be up for debate in my opinion. Some things are more important than a few extra quid 
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,037
    Bedsaddick said:
    CAFCBill said:
    How does everyone feel about them selling naming rights to the Valley? Seems like they might be trying to do that unless I have misread the brochure
    I'm quite superficial in the fact that if it's for megabucks and gets the team promoted then fine ( as long as The Valley is still in the name) but if it's for a couple of hundred grand and we get called The Tough Sheet Valley then bollocks to that. 


    I’m not an expert, but it seems unlikely to me that naming rights would fetch more than a couple of hundred grand a year. Hopefully I’m wrong and we flog them for gazillions finding the greatest squad we’ve ever seen, but I’m going to try and set my expectations low. 
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 15,814
    CAFCBill said:
    How does everyone feel about them selling naming rights to the Valley? Seems like they might be trying to do that unless I have misread the brochure
    if it brings in ££££ then crack on, it'll always be 'The Valley' to the fans
  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,314
    Selling naming rights is a disgrace. 
  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,259
    cabbles said:
    “The Plymouth Herald Valley”
    Are you Ronnie in disguise  :D
  • valleynick66
    valleynick66 Posts: 4,890
    Can’t even sell tickets so doubt they will sell much sponsorship at any significant amount. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,314
    valleynick66 said:
    Can’t even sell tickets so doubt they will sell much sponsorship at any significant amount. 
    Which makes it all the more ridiculous. Will anger a lot of fans. 
  • Kap10
    Kap10 Posts: 15,572
    The "Only Fans Valley" has a ring to it
  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,259
    Bedsaddick sai :# d:
    CAFCBill said:
    How does everyone feel about them selling naming rights to the Valley? Seems like they might be trying to do that unless I have misread the brochure
    I'm quite superficial in the fact that if it's for megabucks and gets the team promoted then fine ( as long as The Valley is still in the name) but if it's for a couple of hundred grand and we get called The Tough Sheet Valley then bollocks to that. 




     It won't be for Megabucks in division 3 unless one of our billionaires companies want to sponsor us. More likely as  you "suggest" will be a couple of hundred grand & will go towards putting locks on the AC stand toilets  :#
  • AberystwythAddick
    AberystwythAddick Posts: 913
    Sell the naming rights, people will call it The Valley any way (SJP is the best example). Who cares, if it means we can afford a new player from it
  • AberystwythAddick
    AberystwythAddick Posts: 913
    NabySarr said:
    They’ve been here for 2 years now and talk a lot about fan engagement but this just proves they know absolutely fuck all about the fanbase 
    So they should just give up on a highly viable revenue stream because fans don’t like it? Jones would have been sacked if fans got what they wanted… 
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,272
    At the end of the day most grounds have the naming rights sold. 

    Birmingham play at the St. Andrews @ Knighthead Park

    Everyone still calls it St. Andrews

    Even if it's called the Westminster Waste Arena at The Valley, everyone will still call it The Valley
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,040
    sam3110 said:
    At the end of the day most grounds have the naming rights sold. 

    Birmingham play at the St. Andrews @ Knighthead Park

    Everyone still calls it St. Andrews

    Even if it's called the Westminster Waste Arena at The Valley, everyone will still call it The Valley
    Wembley has got to be the worst for this. EE are paying millions a year and no one ever calls it the stupidly titled Wembley Stadium Connected By EE 
  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,464
    edited February 20
    cookierules said:
    Naming Rights…….👎🏻
    Maybe one of these companies
  • KiwiValley
    KiwiValley Posts: 3,380
    The design on that site produced actual visual discomfort for me. I was really interested to read about was on there but couldn't stay on the site. Genuinely disturbed my vision. I still feel unsettled now. I am not even joking. Weird. Some kind of visual white noise that would make me spill my secrets in no time if interrogated.

Categories

“Marketplace”