Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

23/24 Injuries thread

124678

Comments

  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    To put our 4(?) into perspective 

    Premier League injury table going into Game-week 7:

    🔵 Chelsea: 10
    ⚔️ Sheffield United: 9
    🦅 Crystal Palace: 9
    ⚫ Newcastle United: 9
    👹 Manchester United: 8
    🔴 Arsenal: 8
    ⚪ Tottenham: 8
    🐝 Brentford: 6
    🟣 Burnley: 6
    🍒 Bournemouth: 6
    👒 Luton Town: 6
    🦁 Aston Villa: 5
    🟥 Liverpool: 4
    🕊️ Brighton: 4
    🍬 Everton: 4
    ⚪ Fulham: 4
    🔵 Manchester City: 3
    🌳 Nottingham Forest: 2
    ⚒️ West Ham: 1
    🐺 Wolves: 0
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,360
    Cafc43v3r said:
    To put our 4(?) into perspective 

    Premier League injury table going into Game-week 7:

    🔵 Chelsea: 10
    ⚔️ Sheffield United: 9
    🦅 Crystal Palace: 9
    ⚫ Newcastle United: 9
    👹 Manchester United: 8
    🔴 Arsenal: 8
    ⚪ Tottenham: 8
    🐝 Brentford: 6
    🟣 Burnley: 6
    🍒 Bournemouth: 6
    👒 Luton Town: 6
    🦁 Aston Villa: 5
    🟥 Liverpool: 4
    🕊️ Brighton: 4
    🍬 Everton: 4
    ⚪ Fulham: 4
    🔵 Manchester City: 3
    🌳 Nottingham Forest: 2
    ⚒️ West Ham: 1
    🐺 Wolves: 0
    Squad sizes are a bit bigger up there though. A L1 table representation would be better. 
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    edited September 2023
    Dazzler21 said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    To put our 4(?) into perspective 

    Premier League injury table going into Game-week 7:

    🔵 Chelsea: 10
    ⚔️ Sheffield United: 9
    🦅 Crystal Palace: 9
    ⚫ Newcastle United: 9
    👹 Manchester United: 8
    🔴 Arsenal: 8
    ⚪ Tottenham: 8
    🐝 Brentford: 6
    🟣 Burnley: 6
    🍒 Bournemouth: 6
    👒 Luton Town: 6
    🦁 Aston Villa: 5
    🟥 Liverpool: 4
    🕊️ Brighton: 4
    🍬 Everton: 4
    ⚪ Fulham: 4
    🔵 Manchester City: 3
    🌳 Nottingham Forest: 2
    ⚒️ West Ham: 1
    🐺 Wolves: 0
    Squad sizes are a bit bigger up there though. A L1 table representation would be better. 
    They also have a stricter "squad cap" in terms of the numbers they can register.

    Ot doesn't say how well should cope with it just the number of injuries isn't a "Charlton thing".  Sheffield United Chelsea and Palace can hardly blame playing in Europe either.
  • Athletico Charlton
    Athletico Charlton Posts: 14,282
    edited September 2023
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    To put our 4(?) into perspective 

    Premier League injury table going into Game-week 7:

    🔵 Chelsea: 10
    ⚔️ Sheffield United: 9
    🦅 Crystal Palace: 9
    ⚫ Newcastle United: 9
    👹 Manchester United: 8
    🔴 Arsenal: 8
    ⚪ Tottenham: 8
    🐝 Brentford: 6
    🟣 Burnley: 6
    🍒 Bournemouth: 6
    👒 Luton Town: 6
    🦁 Aston Villa: 5
    🟥 Liverpool: 4
    🕊️ Brighton: 4
    🍬 Everton: 4
    ⚪ Fulham: 4
    🔵 Manchester City: 3
    🌳 Nottingham Forest: 2
    ⚒️ West Ham: 1
    🐺 Wolves: 0
    Squad sizes are a bit bigger up there though. A L1 table representation would be better. 
    They also have a stricter "squad cap" in terms of the numbers they can register.

    Ot doesn't say how well should cope with it just the number of injuries isn't a "Charlton thing".  Sheffield United Chelsea and Palace can hardly blame playing in Europe either.

    Ten Haag at Man Utd complaining about the crazy schedule, it's just too much for the players... 6 weeks after Man utd come back from their summer, money making and brand growing long tour of the USA.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,360

    Previously Injured - Now Fit. 

    Leaburn - Missed 5 games
    T.Taylor - Missed 3 games
    T.Campbell - Missed 3 games
    Chin - Missed 5 games
    Aneke - Missed 6 games.
    May - Missed , Concussion
    T. Taylor - missed 1, Concussion 
    Asiimwe - Missed 2 - Training inj
    Fraser - Missed 7 games - 

    Currently Injured:

    Camara - Missed 5 games - Expected back?
    McGrandles - Missed 3 games - Training Ground Injury - Expected back?
    Edun - missed 2 - Training inj - 3-4 weeks.
    T.Taylor - NEW - Knee Injury

    So Terry is becoming our most injury prone player since... Well Chuks Aneke. 
  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,408
    3 CMs out at the moment. Good to see Fraser back to ease the pain.
  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,473

    Michael Appleton has provided a detailed injury update ahead of Saturday's clash against Blackpool at The Valley.

    The Head Coach confirmed Panutche Camará is making steady progress in his recovery from a foot injury that has kept him out since mid-August.

    "Pan’s definitely progressing, but, given the type of injury that it is, you’ve got to be slow with it unfortunately and you’ve got to give it time," he explained. "The good thing is that he’s got a pair of boots on and he’s been out on the grass for a few days.

    "He’s working with the strength and conditioning lads and obviously bridging that gap before going back into full training. He’s still a bit away from that, but, for him, he can probably see a little bit of light at the end of the tunnel now."

    Appleton also provided an update on the fitness of Tayo Edun (hamstring), Harry Isted (knee) and Conor McGrandles (knee).

    He said: “Tayo’s going to be a good few weeks yet. Harry’s probably looking more weeks instead of months. It could be six weeks or so before we see him, as long as he stays pain-free with the injury because it’s a nasty one.

    "The sports science lads have had to put the reins on Conor slightly, just because of a bit of discomfort in the back area of the knee,” added Appleton. “I think’s that quite normal from what I’m hearing and it’s something that they want to settle down, so he may be another couple of weeks or so.”

    Meanwhile, Terry Taylor is set to be missing for a period of time with an ankle injury sustained during last weekend’s goalless draw at Shrewsbury Town.

    “Terry’s injury doesn’t look like a great one - I think it’s a bad one to the ligaments,” revealed the Head Coach. “From Terry’s point of view, they haven’t put a timeline on anything yet but we’re not going to see him for a while - that’s the long and short of it.

  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,408
    Nice to hear the updates, even if most appear to be mid-term injuries.

    @Cafc43v3r, I presume you will be reporting Michael Appleton for breaching medical records?

    *there is a tongue in cheek, btw*
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,176
    Shame about Taylor, feels like his season is following the McGrandles route from last year of starting off and getting injured, playing unfit and not getting much out of it and then getting a bad one. Realistically he's going to struggle to have too much impact this season if our injuries go how they normally do. He was always likely to be Dobson's understudy this season but this isn't a great way to integrate
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,594
    Taylor's is maybe as a consequence of having an injury towards the end of last season and then not a proper pre season. No point in rushing things, we have cover, maybe Pan back in a month too. Just make sure Taylor recovers properly and see him in the new year.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Pan back just in time for ACON
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 12,001
    Real shame about Taylor. Sounds like it’s long term 
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,386
    Ryan Viggars u21 striker - ACL


  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,408
    Old fashioned looking room. Has he been fast tracked to a care home?!
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,760
    So no update then. 
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,468
    I'm worried that they've waited two days for a scan. It might be because they're waiting for the swelling to go down, which would not be good. 
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,594
    edited October 2023
    .
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,468
    SDAddick said:
    I'm worried that they've waited two days for a scan. It might be because they're waiting for the swelling to go down, which would not be good. 
    Maybe waiting for swelling to go down?
    Right, but to me that would indicate it's bad.
  • Sage
    Sage Posts: 7,278
    SDAddick said:
    SDAddick said:
    I'm worried that they've waited two days for a scan. It might be because they're waiting for the swelling to go down, which would not be good. 
    Maybe waiting for swelling to go down?
    Right, but to me that would indicate it's bad.
    I don’t think they’re hopeful of a great outcome. Complete guess but I think the best case is Chuks is back end of November :disappointed:

  • Sponsored links:



  • Sage said:
    SDAddick said:
    SDAddick said:
    I'm worried that they've waited two days for a scan. It might be because they're waiting for the swelling to go down, which would not be good. 
    Maybe waiting for swelling to go down?
    Right, but to me that would indicate it's bad.
    I don’t think they’re hopeful of a great outcome. Complete guess but I think the best case is Chuks is back end of November :disappointed:
    Which year?
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Sage said:
    SDAddick said:
    SDAddick said:
    I'm worried that they've waited two days for a scan. It might be because they're waiting for the swelling to go down, which would not be good. 
    Maybe waiting for swelling to go down?
    Right, but to me that would indicate it's bad.
    I don’t think they’re hopeful of a great outcome. Complete guess but I think the best case is Chuks is back end of November :disappointed:
    If he was going to miss Tuesday, Saturday, Tuesday no matter how minor it was really that's only 3 extra league games.
  • Ive just seen a post.
    Someone said they saw Chuks yesterday and he thought it would be a couple of weeks.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,360
    Apologies I haven't continued to track this, work has been mad and headspace is currently all work no play. 
  • If he is back in the match-day squad end of november I would take that, when he pulled up I feared i could be a 3-4 month hamstring tear like last time.

    I really hope we stop starting him when he does come back, we need to accept he is a super-sub for the last 20-25 mins and st0p trying to start im as everytime he does he is only a couple of games away from an injury.
  • Do we know how far off Edun is? 3 weeks ago MA said "a good few weeks".
  • Billy_Mix
    Billy_Mix Posts: 2,707
    Ive just seen a post.
    Someone said they saw Chuks yesterday and he thought it would be a couple of weeks.
    That would be great news if there's any truth in it. 
    With the greatest respect to all concerned - breath.not.held
     Starting any games has always been a risk for Chuks, expecting him to last 45+ minutes is a triumph of hope over reason.
    With Chuks's contribution to the recent turn of forma and the current run of Saturday - Tuesday - Saturday  fixtures it was reckless
     
  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,408
    Billy_Mix said:
    Ive just seen a post.
    Someone said they saw Chuks yesterday and he thought it would be a couple of weeks.
    That would be great news if there's any truth in it. 
    With the greatest respect to all concerned - breath.not.held
     Starting any games has always been a risk for Chuks, expecting him to last 45+ minutes is a triumph of hope over reason.
    With Chuks's contribution to the recent turn of forma and the current run of Saturday - Tuesday - Saturday  fixtures it was reckless
     
    Yes, the last sighting we had of Chuks, it was claimed he was partially disabled in a jacuzzi at David Lloyds.
  • JaShea99
    JaShea99 Posts: 5,461
    If he is back in the match-day squad end of november I would take that, when he pulled up I feared i could be a 3-4 month hamstring tear like last time.

    I really hope we stop starting him when he does come back, we need to accept he is a super-sub for the last 20-25 mins and st0p trying to start im as everytime he does he is only a couple of games away from an injury.
    But what difference does it make? He could easily come on on 65 minutes and still get crocked. Was it Brighton when he was subbed on and subbed off within 5 minutes? 
  • JaShea99 said:
    If he is back in the match-day squad end of november I would take that, when he pulled up I feared i could be a 3-4 month hamstring tear like last time.

    I really hope we stop starting him when he does come back, we need to accept he is a super-sub for the last 20-25 mins and st0p trying to start im as everytime he does he is only a couple of games away from an injury.
    But what difference does it make? He could easily come on on 65 minutes and still get crocked. Was it Brighton when he was subbed on and subbed off within 5 minutes? 
    Looks like the minutes he played before his last 3 significant injuries out were 30, 26 and 5.