Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Rugby World Cup - Nationality Qualifications.

Sillybilly
Posts: 9,234
Not sure if there is a thread already but my already diminishing interest was dulled even further by this article today.
I think the nationality rules are now utterly out of hand. Not a xenophobic comment at all as I am a proud Scot who could and would now happily represent England in the Paralympics if my time came. I have however done 40 years service, raised my kids here, married an Englishwoman and am proud to call the place home. Incidentally the secret of the longevity of my marriage is that she’s never actually understood a word I’ve said!
Thoughts from the masses? (On the rugger rather than my marriage please🤣)
Thoughts from the masses? (On the rugger rather than my marriage please🤣)
7
Comments
-
Totally agree, New Zealand have cherry picked the best talent from the pacific islands for years. Utter farce. It’s the same here in wales with the women’s team. My friends daughter is wales u18 captain. The welsh ru pay her £4000 per year. She’s in Hartbury College. The English ru have offered her £50,000 with free boarding and and a place at Kingston uni with no fees.5
-
Rugby Union talent is spread pretty thin. Nowadays there is a demand especially for huge young men to play in the forwards, the South Pacific Islands and (e.g.) South Africa have a surplus of such giants. Forget New Zealand for a minute, Scotland have four Saffie born players in their squad, two wingers and two props, England have (e.g.) Saffie born Ribbans , and the seemingly omnipresent, undroppable Billy Vunipola. France include a Saffie and at least two 'Islanders'. Italy usually have more 'imports' than natives in their teams, Wales also regularly have an 'Islander' or two in their squad.
I suspect that without the influx of overseas born players, who after all have to comply with a qualification period, there would be no real international competition, not ideal but that is the position.
As for @WelshAddick's example of poaching youngsters, that is worrying, but the good news might be that the RFU is prepared to pay big money to strengthen the women's team. The RFU has 'sponsored' overseas players for many years, the aforementioned Billy Vunipola and his brother for example.
I suspect that @Sillybilly is still a proud Scot at heart despite being 'englishised'. I m o the Scots R U team is punching well above it's weight (no pun intended) and is in good and confident order with the best coach and captain in the home nations (see the recent performance v France for example). Irish supporters might question that assertion. I only wish that the England outfit was in such good nick going into the World Cup
1 -
It's ridiculous I agree, but then I would go further and removed the "grandparent" eligibility for international football as well.
The problem is that international managers and boards treat international sport like club sport, where if your team isn't good enough you "sign" someone to make it better.2 -
As long as rugby is allowed to set its own rules and it polices them properly, I don't have an issue with it. Dempsey has a Scottish grandfather and therefore, within the rules, he is allowed to represent Scotland. He has also represented another country, but hasn't played for them for three years - again, that's within the rules.
As long as there are rules in place and the rules are followed, then there shouldn't be an issue.
It does, however, shine a light on the notion of being "Scottish" or "English", and so on. No-one has a Scottish passport, or an English passport. So, is there a straightforward, testable definition of being "Scottish" or "English" that works?0 -
South African born John Hewie played for Scotland and joked that he never set foot north of the border until he pulled on his international jersey at the age of 24.1
-
Blackheathen said:South African born John Hewie played for Scotland and joked that he never set foot north of the border until he pulled on his international jersey at the age of 24.0
-
the shock that a minority sport with a self inflated view of itself, bends the rules to make it fit it
1 -
WelshAddick said:Totally agree, New Zealand have cherry picked the best talent from the pacific islands for years. Utter farce. It’s the same here in wales with the women’s team. My friends daughter is wales u18 captain. The welsh ru pay her £4000 per year. She’s in Hartbury College. The English ru have offered her £50,000 with free boarding and and a place at Kingston uni with no fees.0
-
Blackheathen said:WelshAddick said:Totally agree, New Zealand have cherry picked the best talent from the pacific islands for years. Utter farce. It’s the same here in wales with the women’s team. My friends daughter is wales u18 captain. The welsh ru pay her £4000 per year. She’s in Hartbury College. The English ru have offered her £50,000 with free boarding and and a place at Kingston uni with no fees.0
-
I think in football if you're born in the UK you can actually play for any of the 4 UK nations?0
- Sponsored links:
-
Lincsaddick said:Blackheathen said:WelshAddick said:Totally agree, New Zealand have cherry picked the best talent from the pacific islands for years. Utter farce. It’s the same here in wales with the women’s team. My friends daughter is wales u18 captain. The welsh ru pay her £4000 per year. She’s in Hartbury College. The English ru have offered her £50,000 with free boarding and and a place at Kingston uni with no fees.3
-
Rothko said:the shock that a minority sport with a self inflated view of itself, bends the rules to make it fit it
How are they 'bending' the rules compared to football?
1 -
iaitch said:Lincsaddick said:Blackheathen said:WelshAddick said:Totally agree, New Zealand have cherry picked the best talent from the pacific islands for years. Utter farce. It’s the same here in wales with the women’s team. My friends daughter is wales u18 captain. The welsh ru pay her £4000 per year. She’s in Hartbury College. The English ru have offered her £50,000 with free boarding and and a place at Kingston uni with no fees.0
-
CAFCTrev said:I think in football if you're born in the UK you can actually play for any of the 4 UK nations?3
-
follett said:CAFCTrev said:I think in football if you're born in the UK you can actually play for any of the 4 UK nations?
Our own John Robinson too. Born in Zimbabwe, I think his father was Scottish1 -
killerandflash said:follett said:CAFCTrev said:I think in football if you're born in the UK you can actually play for any of the 4 UK nations?
Our own John Robinson too. Born in Zimbabwe, I think his father was Scottish
Pat van de Hauwe didn’t have a drop of Welsh blood in him either!
I didnt realise that loophole had actually been closed.0 -
CAFCTrev said:I think in football if you're born in the UK you can actually play for any of the 4 UK nations?1
-
Lincsaddick said:
I bet secretly he says 'Hoots mon' and recites 'wee timorous beastie' and drinks a pint of heavy and pronounces the word 'murder' as 'mudder'.1 -
Chizz said:As long as rugby is allowed to set its own rules and it polices them properly, I don't have an issue with it. Dempsey has a Scottish grandfather and therefore, within the rules, he is allowed to represent Scotland. He has also represented another country, but hasn't played for them for three years - again, that's within the rules.
As long as there are rules in place and the rules are followed, then there shouldn't be an issue.
It does, however, shine a light on the notion of being "Scottish" or "English", and so on. No-one has a Scottish passport, or an English passport. So, is there a straightforward, testable definition of being "Scottish" or "English" that works?1 - Sponsored links:
-
PrincessFiona said:Rothko said:the shock that a minority sport with a self inflated view of itself, bends the rules to make it fit it
How are they 'bending' the rules compared to football?2 -
Sillybilly said:Chizz said:As long as rugby is allowed to set its own rules and it polices them properly, I don't have an issue with it. Dempsey has a Scottish grandfather and therefore, within the rules, he is allowed to represent Scotland. He has also represented another country, but hasn't played for them for three years - again, that's within the rules.
As long as there are rules in place and the rules are followed, then there shouldn't be an issue.
It does, however, shine a light on the notion of being "Scottish" or "English", and so on. No-one has a Scottish passport, or an English passport. So, is there a straightforward, testable definition of being "Scottish" or "English" that works?0 -
Rothko said:PrincessFiona said:Rothko said:the shock that a minority sport with a self inflated view of itself, bends the rules to make it fit it
How are they 'bending' the rules compared to football?
i m o as an ex player with a pretty good knowledge of the game, watching Rugby holds more interest for me than (e.g.) watching people mountain climbing. however precarious and dangerous that particular 'sport' might be with it's potential for death and disaster. Enjoy (if you can as an Addick) the football season0 -
PrincessFiona said:Sillybilly said:Chizz said:As long as rugby is allowed to set its own rules and it polices them properly, I don't have an issue with it. Dempsey has a Scottish grandfather and therefore, within the rules, he is allowed to represent Scotland. He has also represented another country, but hasn't played for them for three years - again, that's within the rules.
As long as there are rules in place and the rules are followed, then there shouldn't be an issue.
It does, however, shine a light on the notion of being "Scottish" or "English", and so on. No-one has a Scottish passport, or an English passport. So, is there a straightforward, testable definition of being "Scottish" or "English" that works?0 -
PrincessFiona said:Sillybilly said:Chizz said:As long as rugby is allowed to set its own rules and it polices them properly, I don't have an issue with it. Dempsey has a Scottish grandfather and therefore, within the rules, he is allowed to represent Scotland. He has also represented another country, but hasn't played for them for three years - again, that's within the rules.
As long as there are rules in place and the rules are followed, then there shouldn't be an issue.
It does, however, shine a light on the notion of being "Scottish" or "English", and so on. No-one has a Scottish passport, or an English passport. So, is there a straightforward, testable definition of being "Scottish" or "English" that works?0 -
McBobbin said:PrincessFiona said:Sillybilly said:Chizz said:As long as rugby is allowed to set its own rules and it polices them properly, I don't have an issue with it. Dempsey has a Scottish grandfather and therefore, within the rules, he is allowed to represent Scotland. He has also represented another country, but hasn't played for them for three years - again, that's within the rules.
As long as there are rules in place and the rules are followed, then there shouldn't be an issue.
It does, however, shine a light on the notion of being "Scottish" or "English", and so on. No-one has a Scottish passport, or an English passport. So, is there a straightforward, testable definition of being "Scottish" or "English" that works?0 -
PrincessFiona said:Rothko said:the shock that a minority sport with a self inflated view of itself, bends the rules to make it fit it
How are they 'bending' the rules compared to football?
I don't know how he got off the red card though0 -
JohnnyH2 said:PrincessFiona said:Sillybilly said:Chizz said:As long as rugby is allowed to set its own rules and it polices them properly, I don't have an issue with it. Dempsey has a Scottish grandfather and therefore, within the rules, he is allowed to represent Scotland. He has also represented another country, but hasn't played for them for three years - again, that's within the rules.
As long as there are rules in place and the rules are followed, then there shouldn't be an issue.
It does, however, shine a light on the notion of being "Scottish" or "English", and so on. No-one has a Scottish passport, or an English passport. So, is there a straightforward, testable definition of being "Scottish" or "English" that works?0 -
Lincsaddick said:Blackheathen said:WelshAddick said:Totally agree, New Zealand have cherry picked the best talent from the pacific islands for years. Utter farce. It’s the same here in wales with the women’s team. My friends daughter is wales u18 captain. The welsh ru pay her £4000 per year. She’s in Hartbury College. The English ru have offered her £50,000 with free boarding and and a place at Kingston uni with no fees.0
-
It really has become a bit silly, the pilfering of South Pacific Island players by all the major nations is beyond ridiculous but you cannot blame the players. Moving from Tonga to play for the All Blacks has huge financial rewards. They could stay and the money spreads around more evenly but that doesn't look like happening all the while the Tier 1 nations control the game. Have to say the Springjocks....sorry the Scottish national team, are particularly punching above their weight with the South African influx.
I feel for the smaller countries like Georgia who have a phenomenal team but have to fight against this merry go round of player nationalities as well as being held down by World Rugby and the tier 1 nations who are protecting their income stream. I love rugby it's a great game but it needs a massive overhaul across the world. It also needs an overhaul in this country too so it's not stacked in the favour of elite schools and their players.3