Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Mason Burstow - on loan to Bolton from Hull (p53)
Comments
-
Again, let'[s wait and see. We had planned to have our business finished but maybe we didn't expect someone to match our valuation for Mason.SELR_addicks said:
If it's substantial then we should be lining up a pricy replacement no?Callumcafc said:
The only suggestion is that the fee is "substantial" so let's wait and see.Dazzler21 said:
We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!SELR_addicks said:
Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee?Callumcafc said:
No-one ever said this.SELR_addicks said:He's gone.
So much for not selling our rising stars.
Bet the fee will be risable.
This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in.3 -
Undisclosed.0
-
Does he?! Looks a bit drunk if anythingcharlton_hero said:
Jackson looking stressed there.Callumcafc said:6 -
Same old same old.At least previous owners let us see the lads for at least half a season before cashing in!0
-
Tearful if you ask me1
-
If they haven’t got anyone lined up for the likely hood of mason leaving then we shouldn’t be entertaining bidskillerandflash said:
How are we going to find a similar goalpoacher at short notice on the last evening of the window?cafcdave123 said:I don’t want him to go just yet as I’d like to actually be able to support our youngsters but IF he leaves today I don’t want him back for the rest of the season I want him replaced
If this had happened 2 weeks ago, then we could have chosen to find a replacement4 -
We had six January windows under Roland. The first window was a disaster after selling Stephens to Brighton and Yann to Bournemouth.SELR_addicks said:
The deadline day sale of a top prospect does seem to ring a bell from Roland yes.Dazzler21 said:
We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!SELR_addicks said:
Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee?Callumcafc said:
No-one ever said this.SELR_addicks said:He's gone.
So much for not selling our rising stars.
Bet the fee will be risable.
This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in.
The following four windows had no major outgoings.
The last window we sold Karlan Grant to Premier League Huddersfield before he ran out his contract. We got a 2m fee up front and substantial add on clauses.
You're acting like we lost a key player every single Jnauary deadline day. It's simply not true.2 -
Who knows?SELR_addicks said:
If it's substantial then we should be lining up a pricy replacement no?Callumcafc said:
The only suggestion is that the fee is "substantial" so let's wait and see.Dazzler21 said:
We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!SELR_addicks said:
Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee?Callumcafc said:
No-one ever said this.SELR_addicks said:He's gone.
So much for not selling our rising stars.
Bet the fee will be risable.
This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in.
The bid has obviously only come in today. I wouldn't get your hopes of a replacement up yet, maybe in the summer though. Or work a loan deal back off that club for a slightly more established player for now?1 -
Maybe Abramovich is trying to spend his money before it is frozen!3
-
Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that.3
-
Sponsored links:
-
Would be nice to get a full season out of these players. Let’s hope it’s not for peanuts as usual.0
-
Just want Mase back
3 -
What's the fee that would lead you to put your toys back in your pram?SELR_addicks said:
Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee?Callumcafc said:
No-one ever said this.SELR_addicks said:He's gone.
So much for not selling our rising stars.
Bet the fee will be risable.
This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in.
4 -
Chelsea apparently the club who've had the bid accepted.0
-
Wasnt it £11m? - Plus he had Championship experience.SELR_addicks said:Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that.0 -
There’s a ridiculous amount of money at the top level. I’d be asking for ten million.ForeverAddickted said:Only decent factor is if its £2m tops and gets put back into the squad over the summer
That could help put a decent squad together without relying on Sandgaard's own cash
After all, our last title year came from selling Jenkinson2 -
More than Lookman's fee and either a loan back or replacement lined up.Garrymanilow said:
What's the fee that would lead you to put your toys back in your pram?SELR_addicks said:
Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee?Callumcafc said:
No-one ever said this.SELR_addicks said:He's gone.
So much for not selling our rising stars.
Bet the fee will be risable.
This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in.
People seem to forget our current striker shortage.2 -
IF he does go then we are short up top even if the big lad is back fit soon. Tonight's squad has very little option on the bench if we need a goal, but then again the starting 11 lacks goals.1
-
Minimum £5m + 20% sell on + stays with us for the rest of this season
then (whoever) can have him4 -
Sponsored links:
-
Yh I can't see Burstow being that sort of figure, because he hasn't played as much and it has all been in League 1ForeverAddickted said:
Wasnt it £11m? - Plus he had Championship experience.SELR_addicks said:Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that.3 -
Never even got to see him play in person 😂1
-
So I understand if we an outlier here, are there any other league one clubs in recent years who have sold/not sold a talented young player (especially a striker scoring goals) to a premiership club when they came knocking?0
-
Yeah people are in dreamland expecting an eight figure sum.UEAAddick said:
Yh I can't see Burstow being that sort of figure, because he hasn't played as much and it has all been in League 1ForeverAddickted said:
Wasnt it £11m? - Plus he had Championship experience.SELR_addicks said:Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that.
Biggest fees paid for League One players...
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/league-one/transferrekorde/wettbewerb/GB3
0 -
A massive shame but it’s the first time we’ve been able to sell a youngster on our terms, not theirs.
Would I rather he stayed… of course. But this is a nothing season now and IF we can start planning for next year with a healthy balance and get deals in place quickly to really push on next season then losing him is a short term price to pay.
A big IF though and one that Sandgaard will rightly be judged on.1 -
One silver lining is that that c*** Southall didn't cash in on this one.
7 -
Fair play to him, will earn an absolute wedge at Chelsea if that’s true.
Probably the worst move you can make as a young footballer though.5 -
You couldn't make this shit up.
So at the Fleetwood game he was saying goodbye
0 -
Then say no.ForeverAddickted said:
Yeah people are in dreamland expecting an eight figure sum.UEAAddick said:
Yh I can't see Burstow being that sort of figure, because he hasn't played as much and it has all been in League 1ForeverAddickted said:
Wasnt it £11m? - Plus he had Championship experience.SELR_addicks said:Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that.
Biggest fees paid for League One players...
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/league-one/transferrekorde/wettbewerb/GB3
If it's not multiple millions it isn't 'substantial'.2 -
Another lad going to sit on a subs bench some where. What a waste of time.4
