Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
England v Italy - THE FINAL - Match Thread
Comments
-
MuttleyCAFC said:ForeverAddickted said:Mendonca In Asdas said:Has Southgate over or under achieved with the group of players at his disposal?
Are these players as good as the "Golden Generation" that only managed to reach three Quarter-Finals on the trot, I honestly dont think that they are... Not yet anyway yet have gotten further more consistently.
Its only been seven years since that awful display at the 2014 World Cup and only five since the Iceland defeat - Two years on from the latter, a lot of fans had given up on England, yet we suddenly went further than we had for 28-years.
Maybe the learning for Southgate is not so much what he should have done, that would be for him and his staff to decide, but more that he should have done something to change the mood music. This is probably a bigger issue when you play better sides. Also getting an early goal against a decent side has been our downfall in the last two tournaments so there must be some learning there surely. Or does it have to happen three times?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48455034
0 -
Four times then0
-
Dazzler21 said:Jac_52 said:Callumcafc said:Madness. Take the starting elevens of each team last night. The only English players that get into that Italian XI are Kane, Sterling, Shaw and Walker. Some massively overstating the quality in our ranks.The English are all very good players and we have probably the best depth in the world at the moment but the Italians are 34 unbeaten because they have probably the best XI in world football.
Donnarumma over Pickford
Walker over Di Lorenzo
Bonucci over Stones
Chiellini over Maguire
Shaw over Emerson
Jorginho over Rice
Verratti over Phillips
Barella over Mount
Sterling over Insigne
Kane over Immobile
I'll give you donnarumma, forgot about him but Pickford was actually very good this tournament.
Mount wouldn't be in my starting 11 after his early performances but he would for sure have got significant game time with Italy and would have actually been utilised properly. He was anonymous for us because of the system we play.
Disagree on the others except veratti and jorginho. Maguire would fit the Italians extremely well with his ability on the ball and Stones has just won the premier league and played in the champions league final so more than good enough for me and I don't see bonucci or chiellini as being a real upgrade. We made it easy for both of them yesterday.
Sancho, grealish and foden would all walk into that Italian team as well.
Madness
Prick.1 -
golfaddick said:Young kids cant hack it.
Need experienced pros to take penalties6 -
Covered End said:golfaddick said:Young kids cant hack it.
Need experienced pros to take penalties
Surprisingly prior to Rashford (23) missing his penalty, the last player of a similar age to miss was Vassell who was also 23 in Euro 2004 - The others who all missed, were experienced players, some might have heard of them: Beckham | Gerrard | Lampard | Carragher?4 -
DamoNorthStand said:Grealish gives it the big one all the time, playing up to the fans and thinking he is Gazza 1990. Comes to the crunch and fucks right off like a fucking coward and let’s Saka step up in his place.11
-
AFKABartram said:Can’t help feel opportunity lost and that the goal so early just didn’t help us. Italy on balance of play the better team. For a couple of our key players it looked one game too many.Gutted.0
-
Covered End said:AFKABartram said:Can’t help feel opportunity lost and that the goal so early just didn’t help us. Italy on balance of play the better team. For a couple of our key players it looked one game too many.Gutted.3
-
ForeverAddickted said:0
- Sponsored links:
-
orpingtonRED said:ForeverAddickted said:11
-
ForeverAddickted said:orpingtonRED said:ForeverAddickted said:
I hadn't heard of any throwing objects during the match but if there's a charge I'm guessing there's evidence it happened.
I've never seen it when I've been at Wembley before.1 -
Wasnt there mention of broken glass everywhere outside the stadium from issues throwing bottles?
Wonder if its that0 -
ForeverAddickted said:Wasnt there mention of broken glass everywhere outside the stadium from issues throwing bottles?
Wonder if its that1 -
SouthWest_Addicks said:ForeverAddickted said:Wasnt there mention of broken glass everywhere outside the stadium from issues throwing bottles?
Wonder if its that0 -
MuttleyCAFC said:Elthamaddick said:charltonkeston said:Rashford did everything right with his penalty and missed by less than 4 inches. Saka's not so good but he stood up to be counted. Good save by the keeper for the other one.
The subs were correct, you need penalty takers on the pitch. The two that came on were not on there to do much other than take a penalty.
Anyone can miss or have a penalty saved. The European champions missed 2 of theirs.
Tactically we were good for the first 30 minutes then Italians were able to exploit our setup. 2nd half we were in danger of having a new arse torn for us, they were that dominant.
By anyone's measure we had a very successful Euros, only one team had better.
Fine margins between success and failure but still a great achievement to finish as runners up to a better team.
The only criticism I have of the players was the taking off the medals as soon as they were put on. Looked a bit childish to me.
if he practiced like that in training then I'd have hoped someone would've pulled him up on ithttps://youtu.be/KFf1tXs6tdg
0 -
TEL said:MuttleyCAFC said:Elthamaddick said:charltonkeston said:Rashford did everything right with his penalty and missed by less than 4 inches. Saka's not so good but he stood up to be counted. Good save by the keeper for the other one.
The subs were correct, you need penalty takers on the pitch. The two that came on were not on there to do much other than take a penalty.
Anyone can miss or have a penalty saved. The European champions missed 2 of theirs.
Tactically we were good for the first 30 minutes then Italians were able to exploit our setup. 2nd half we were in danger of having a new arse torn for us, they were that dominant.
By anyone's measure we had a very successful Euros, only one team had better.
Fine margins between success and failure but still a great achievement to finish as runners up to a better team.
The only criticism I have of the players was the taking off the medals as soon as they were put on. Looked a bit childish to me.
if he practiced like that in training then I'd have hoped someone would've pulled him up on ithttps://youtu.be/KFf1tXs6tdg
Also how awful did we look there!1 -
My only trip to Rochdale after years of nearly making it, and I was served up with that shit.1
-
I picked Italy from the very first games to win this(gutted to be right),simply because of the experience they had all over the pitch.Enough has been said about the defenders,but their midfield was simply players at the peak of their careers.Veratti,was everywhere, we had nobody anywhere near as influential as he was,Jorghinio the same(should have gone off).Our midfield was made up of very young players,mostly in the infancy of their international careers.Our defence fully experienced,was excellent,our attack,Kane and Sterling scored 7 ,and could have got more with a bit more forward play.Prior to the world cup,all our young lads will have another season,plus the added competition of James Maddison,Harvey barnes,Mason Greenwood,Out of this superb group of players we have,we must hope that one or more takes the step up from being a star of the future to being a Sergio Busquets or De Bruyne,then we will win .0
-
Pretty sure we'll have to play a couple of matches behind closed doors, similar to the punishment Hungary got for their fans racist and homophobic chants. Especially coming off the back of the fine for incidents at the Denmark game.
The ban won't affect the WC qualifiers though as the Euro's are sanctioned by UEFA, so won't affect any games until the Nations league starts in 2022.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Good point about the midfield. I don't think Rice and Phillips will ever be at the level of Verratti and Jorginho. We need Bellingham to grow up fast.0
-
Looking back through the stats, I didn't realise how one sided the game ended up being, on paper at least.
Really only one team should have won it looking at this, and that team isn't England, so we did well to force it to penalties0 -
Chunes said:Good point about the midfield. I don't think Rice and Phillips will ever be at the level of Verratti and Jorginho. We need Bellingham to grow up fast.4
-
ValleyGary said:Chunes said:Good point about the midfield. I don't think Rice and Phillips will ever be at the level of Verratti and Jorginho. We need Bellingham to grow up fast.
Would like us to play a more forward thinking midfielder alongside him than Phillips (or Henderson) in the qualifiers to hopefully play that way in the World Cup, but can almost.guarantee it'll be Henderson.
1 -
North Lower Neil said:ValleyGary said:Chunes said:Good point about the midfield. I don't think Rice and Phillips will ever be at the level of Verratti and Jorginho. We need Bellingham to grow up fast.
Would like us to play a more forward thinking midfielder alongside him than Phillips (or Henderson) in the qualifiers to hopefully play that way in the World Cup, but can almost.guarantee it'll be Henderson.3 -
Grealish is a fine player,very exciting on the ball,gets you lots of free kicks,but would like to see a few more goals,he faces lots of competition in the international set up.When we talk about Verratti and Jorghinio,we are talking top of the tree players,who will take games by the scruff of the neck and win them.It is possible that with the talent we have in our young midfield,someone could emerge to this level.Bellingham could well be the one,but he is only 18,My bet is Phil Foden,he has the manager,and in De Bruyne and recently David Silva has worked with the best in the business,also Mount will be playing with Jorghinio,which will do him no harm whatsoever.2
-
sam3110 said:Looking back through the stats, I didn't realise how one sided the game ended up being, on paper at least.
Really only one team should have won it looking at this, and that team isn't England, so we did well to force it to penalties
Whilst Southgate was never going to go all out attack, if we hadn't scored so early then we probably wouldn't have sat back quite so much and it would potentially have been a bit more even like the Germany game.4 -
ValleyGary said:Chunes said:Good point about the midfield. I don't think Rice and Phillips will ever be at the level of Verratti and Jorginho. We need Bellingham to grow up fast.
Not to say I don't think Rice is a very good player, because he is, and he had a good tournament.0 -
I love this rhetoric that we apparently sat back to defend as soon as we scored...
We took the game to Italy for the full first 20 minutes that's at least 17 minutes after the goal, or at lease long enough for Italy to adjust to our game plan.
Once they had us sussed we were limited to sporadic half chances. We came out second half without change to our game plan, that is my only criticism.5 -
Convinced Pickford would of scored a pen. Absolutely convinced of it.0