Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
FIFA Club World Cup
Comments
-
Can all of Liverpools games be VAR controlled from Qatar, maybe see some decisions go against them then haha0
-
Don’t like VAR. still lots of ridiculous errors made so what’s the point.0
-
Urgh I just read somewhere if Liverpool win this they will be the 1st English side to win the International Treble
Champions League
European Super Cup
Club World Cup
In a calender year
United came close but lost to Zenith in the 08 Super Cup after winning Champions League0 -
Bollocks1
-
Must be hard starting a tournament in the semis.2
-
Poor that with all that technology and he still can’t see that’s a foul. Also how was it not also a red card where a yellow was originally given when he gave the initial penalty.0
-
Double Jeopardymart77 said:Poor that with all that technology and he still can’t see that’s a foul. Also how was it not also a red card where a yellow was originally given when he gave the initial penalty.
Although I am confused as to when that comes into play as I have seen reds given for pens this season despite the new Double Jeopardy rule0 -
VAR is always right!0
-
We'd still nause it up.MrOneLung said:Must be hard starting a tournament in the semis.2 -
Crazy how quickly Klopp has turned Liverpool round.
In 2016 they finished EIGHTH in the premier league!
Now 3.5 years later they have reached 2 consecutive champions league finals, are champions of Europe, super cup winners, world club cup winners, are runaway premier league leaders and are unbeaten in the league for almost a year.5 - Sponsored links:
-
Amazing what £400m of players will do for you.....
amazing record last two seasons though.0 -
Their net spend in the last 4 seasons is only 83m. Pretty impressive really.MrOneLung said:Amazing what £400m of players will do for you.....
amazing record last two seasons though.2 -
Sold a player who was already there for 140m odd
and palace paid about 50m for Benteke and Sakho!!0 -
Isn't that all part of running a club though?MrOneLung said:Sold a player who was already there for 140m odd
and palace paid about 50m for Benteke and Sakho!!
They also bought Mane, Salah and Firmino for about 100m combined.
1 -
I dont agree with net spend at all,
From a business point of view yes it may be a good thing, but we are not CEOs we dont care about the business side off thing.
At the end of the day Klopp has spent £400M to achieve what he has achieved, if he has got £320M of that from player sales then great for him, but it doesnt change the fact he has achieved what he has achieved by spending money.
0 -
European Super Cup
Club World Cup
Paint Pot Cup
Full Members Cup
Anglo Italian Cup
The Peoples Cup
Love all the shit ones equally.
0 -
He has bought really well. VVD being the best signing imo. Man City really messed up not signing him.Chris_from_Sidcup said:Crazy how quickly Klopp has turned Liverpool round.
In 2016 they finished EIGHTH in the premier league!
Now 3.5 years later they have reached 2 consecutive champions league finals, are champions of Europe, super cup winners, world club cup winners, are runaway premier league leaders and are unbeaten in the league for almost a year.0 -
Every club in the country spends money, Liverpool would appear to be better than anyone else at doing so.paulie8290 said:I dont agree with net spend at all,
From a business point of view yes it may be a good thing, but we are not CEOs we dont care about the business side off thing.
At the end of the day Klopp has spent £400M to achieve what he has achieved, if he has got £320M of that from player sales then great for him, but it doesnt change the fact he has achieved what he has achieved by spending money.0 -
No one is saying he hasn't spent money, as obviously he has. But as a fan would you rather his approach or United's 'throw money at it and hope it works' approach?paulie8290 said:I dont agree with net spend at all,
From a business point of view yes it may be a good thing, but we are not CEOs we dont care about the business side off thing.
At the end of the day Klopp has spent £400M to achieve what he has achieved, if he has got £320M of that from player sales then great for him, but it doesnt change the fact he has achieved what he has achieved by spending money.
And from 8th in the league to champions of Europe on what is essentially a spend of around 20m a year, is pretty amazing.1 -
Isn’t it the top clubs whining about needing a winter break?0
- Sponsored links:
-
paulie8290 said:I dont agree with net spend at all,
From a business point of view yes it may be a good thing, but we are not CEOs we dont care about the business side off thing.
At the end of the day Klopp has spent £400M to achieve what he has achieved, if he has got £320M of that from player sales then great for him, but it doesnt change the fact he has achieved what he has achieved by spending money.
Ah, it looks like we have Lord Sugar's next business partner.0 -
Again its not £20M a year tho is it maybe net spend but if he has done it in 3 years spending £400M its essntially a spend of £133M a season on new players, with that you can buy 2 or 3 decent players a season, so over 3 seasons thats 9 decent players, maybe a few extras if yoy can get players like Gomez on the cheap.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
No one is saying he hasn't spent money, as obviously he has. But as a fan would you rather his approach or United's 'throw money at it and hope it works' approach?paulie8290 said:I dont agree with net spend at all,
From a business point of view yes it may be a good thing, but we are not CEOs we dont care about the business side off thing.
At the end of the day Klopp has spent £400M to achieve what he has achieved, if he has got £320M of that from player sales then great for him, but it doesnt change the fact he has achieved what he has achieved by spending money.
And from 8th in the league to champions of Europe on what is essentially a spend of around 20m a year, is pretty amazing.
He has spent the money well and the players he has bought have worked out, but like other clubs they could easily not have done as well.
All I am saying is, peiple go on about net spend like it means a massive thing, but it doesnt matter if you have made money selling players like Benteke to Palace for whatever it was, it might help your buisness side of things but when you break it down, its still £400M spent0 -
Of course net spend is important as when you sell players you lose the talent they hold, the higher price a player goes for the more talented one might assume they are.
Benteke was also not sold for 50m.2 -
Net spend is clearly a sensible indicator of how intelligent a football team is being with its recruitment. Silly to suggest otherwise.3
-
Indeed. And also how successful a manager is by making the strategic decisions to buy and sell players when necessary.se9addick said:Net spend is clearly a sensible indicator of how intelligent a football team is being with its recruitment. Silly to suggest otherwise.
1 -
Benteke went for £27m0
-
This was exactly the point i made in my original post.paulie8290 said:
Again its not £20M a year tho is it maybe net spend but if he has done it in 3 years spending £400M its essntially a spend of £133M a season on new players, with that you can buy 2 or 3 decent players a season, so over 3 seasons thats 9 decent players, maybe a few extras if yoy can get players like Gomez on the cheap.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
No one is saying he hasn't spent money, as obviously he has. But as a fan would you rather his approach or United's 'throw money at it and hope it works' approach?paulie8290 said:I dont agree with net spend at all,
From a business point of view yes it may be a good thing, but we are not CEOs we dont care about the business side off thing.
At the end of the day Klopp has spent £400M to achieve what he has achieved, if he has got £320M of that from player sales then great for him, but it doesnt change the fact he has achieved what he has achieved by spending money.
And from 8th in the league to champions of Europe on what is essentially a spend of around 20m a year, is pretty amazing.
He has spent the money well and the players he has bought have worked out, but like other clubs they could easily not have done as well.
All I am saying is, peiple go on about net spend like it means a massive thing, but it doesnt matter if you have made money selling players like Benteke to Palace for £50M, it might help your buisness side of things but when you break it down, its still £400M spent
8th in the league to Champions of Europe and has spent hardly anything overall. Of course you have to take into account the transfer money received, Liverpool are well run and can't spend like City or PSG. For example without selling Coutinho they probably couldn't have got both Alisson and Van Dijk.
0 -
Who said Benteke was 50m?Stu_of_Kunming said:Of course net spend is important as when you sell players you lose the talent they hold, the higher price a player goes for the more talented one might assume they are.
Benteke was also not sold for 50m.0 -
Dont know whats worse!!ValleyGary said:Benteke went for £27m
Liverpool managing to get £27m out of him, or Palace paying it
0 -
Paulie did, before he edited his post after being called out on it. "but it doesnt matter if you have made money selling players like Benteke to Palace for £50M"MrOneLung said:
Who said Benteke was 50m?Stu_of_Kunming said:Of course net spend is important as when you sell players you lose the talent they hold, the higher price a player goes for the more talented one might assume they are.
Benteke was also not sold for 50m.1
