Jim Davidson
Comments
-
It's whatever floats your boat.
Muttley mentioned Ricky gervais
My wife got me and her dad tickets for his show the brother in law was going aswell.
If someone taking the p#ss out of cancer patients is for you crack on.
Don't have a go at me though at something I find funny.
Where do you draw the line?
Can you get much worse at Rodney marshes joke about the tsunami where 250000 people died.
3 -
Everybody finds different stuff funny - doesn't work for me if it's poorly observed or the work of a bully.
0 -
blackpool72 said:More an Alf Garnett fan meself4
-
Acab said:AFKABartram said:
As someone who has worked, shopped, socialised in Central London for 26 years, lived in and had my whole family based in inner London and its suburbs all my life, i personally don't really see any noticeable change in London under the Mayorship of Khan from Johnson from Livingston. They have very little impact.
There's a whole heap of society issues that have impacted upon society changes (take for example the hot topic of increase in knife crime) but i don't see any real difference in direction and governship under any different mayor. So for that reason i think people that blame Johnson for ruining their city or Khan for ruining their city are just looking for an excuse to wage their political spite.
Probabably one for the House of Commoners group rather than the main board
So your saying you haven’t seen any changes in London under the 3 mayors. Your either blind or they are not doing the job they were elected to do.
The latest disaster ‘ Mayor Khant’ and I have spelt that right is to flood London with an extra 80,000 private hire vehicles and at the same time make the roads smaller by installing cycle lanes then implement the ULEZ zone.
I haven’t even began to scratch the surface.1 -
Lincsaddick said:Exiled_Addick said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:SoundAsa£ said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:SoundAsa£ said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:McBobbin said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:
Something you and many others fail to realise or accept.
3 -
se9addick said:RaplhMilne said:This forum does seem to have a very high propensity of extreme left wing snowflakes, who's views are 100% correct, and enlighting for us older members, who by being born in the fifties and sixties are deemed racist bigoted, right wing, Thatcher loving Nazi scum.
On behalf of my parents I apologise to you all for being born 30 years to early and missing out on the utopian world that you all dwell in.
And by not supporting your views, does not mean I support the opposite, it just means . I am from an age, where I believe a variety of elements can make up a world. An not that I personally am the only one who is 100% right.2 -
Covered End said:se9addick said:RaplhMilne said:This forum does seem to have a very high propensity of extreme left wing snowflakes, who's views are 100% correct, and enlighting for us older members, who by being born in the fifties and sixties are deemed racist bigoted, right wing, Thatcher loving Nazi scum.
On behalf of my parents I apologise to you all for being born 30 years to early and missing out on the utopian world that you all dwell in.
And by not supporting your views, does not mean I support the opposite, it just means . I am from an age, where I believe a variety of elements can make up a world. An not that I personally am the only one who is 100% right.0 -
JamesSeed said:Covered End said:se9addick said:RaplhMilne said:This forum does seem to have a very high propensity of extreme left wing snowflakes, who's views are 100% correct, and enlighting for us older members, who by being born in the fifties and sixties are deemed racist bigoted, right wing, Thatcher loving Nazi scum.
On behalf of my parents I apologise to you all for being born 30 years to early and missing out on the utopian world that you all dwell in.
And by not supporting your views, does not mean I support the opposite, it just means . I am from an age, where I believe a variety of elements can make up a world. An not that I personally am the only one who is 100% right.1 -
Covered End said:JamesSeed said:Covered End said:se9addick said:RaplhMilne said:This forum does seem to have a very high propensity of extreme left wing snowflakes, who's views are 100% correct, and enlighting for us older members, who by being born in the fifties and sixties are deemed racist bigoted, right wing, Thatcher loving Nazi scum.
On behalf of my parents I apologise to you all for being born 30 years to early and missing out on the utopian world that you all dwell in.
And by not supporting your views, does not mean I support the opposite, it just means . I am from an age, where I believe a variety of elements can make up a world. An not that I personally am the only one who is 100% right.0 -
clb74 said:It's whatever floats your boat.
Muttley mentioned Ricky gervais
My wife got me and her dad tickets for his show the brother in law was going aswell.
If someone taking the p#ss out of cancer patients is for you crack on.
Don't have a go at me though at something I find funny.
Where do you draw the line?
Can you get much worse at Rodney marshes joke about the tsunami where 250000 people died.0 - Sponsored links:
-
ElfsborgAddick said:Has anybody seen Love thy Neighbour?
Jimbo is a choirboy in comparison.1 -
uie2 said:ElfsborgAddick said:Has anybody seen Love thy Neighbour?
Jimbo is a choirboy in comparison.0 -
JamesSeed said:uie2 said:ElfsborgAddick said:Has anybody seen Love thy Neighbour?
Jimbo is a choirboy in comparison.1 -
JamesSeed said:uie2 said:ElfsborgAddick said:Has anybody seen Love thy Neighbour?
Jimbo is a choirboy in comparison.0 -
se9addick said:JamesSeed said:uie2 said:ElfsborgAddick said:Has anybody seen Love thy Neighbour?
Jimbo is a choirboy in comparison.0 -
For me Alf Garnett was brilliant satire. If you were offended by what he said you didn't get it and if you agreed with what he said it was taking the piss out of you.
Ricky Gervais's stand up can be quite challenging in a similar way. I think how he explained it is that he isn't saying ‘Yes, it is offensive. deal with it.’ he's saying, ‘I don’t think it is offensive. I think you may have misunderstood who the target is.’ Of course he doesn't make that obvious within his act, which is why it can be challenging and the target could be you.1 -
It is an interesting discussion as Comedy is different to all people. I still don't think Love Thy Neighbour was racist. I also think it should be shown in schools as it explains attitudes in the 70s very well IMO.
Eddie, the white socialist racist and Bill the black Tory who was also a bit racist were the butt of the jokes, with Eddie being the butt of most of them. The wives just got on which had its own message. The suggested similarities between the two protagonists and the discovery that despite not admitting it, they had actually become friends is very interesting. It was of its time, but it gets an unfair press, largely because most people haven't seen it.5 -
Was out drinking with Roland this evening - told me he won't sell the club until Jim stops supporting it. He thinks a lot of Jim's material is very dated.0
-
hoof_it_up_to_benty said:Was out drinking with Roland this evening - told me he won't sell the club until Jim stops supporting it. He thinks a lot of Jim's material is very dated.1
-
The bottom line is, Jim is entitled to hold his views and people are entitled to find him funny. It isn't a leftie conspiracy that those numbers are dwindling - just the passage of time.0
- Sponsored links:
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:Was out drinking with Roland this evening - told me he won't sell the club until Jim stops supporting it. He thinks a lot of Jim's material is very dated.0
-
hoof_it_up_to_benty said:i_b_b_o_r_g said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:Was out drinking with Roland this evening - told me he won't sell the club until Jim stops supporting it. He thinks a lot of Jim's material is very dated.0
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:i_b_b_o_r_g said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:Was out drinking with Roland this evening - told me he won't sell the club until Jim stops supporting it. He thinks a lot of Jim's material is very dated.2
-
People that have lived through the 70's and 80's may have a different view from the younger generation.
Jimbo is alright.0 -
ElfsborgAddick said:People that have lived through the 70's and 80's may have a different view from the younger generation.
Jimbo is alright.0 -
hoof_it_up_to_benty said:ElfsborgAddick said:People that have lived through the 70's and 80's may have a different view from the younger generation.
Jimbo is alright.
Did you find your views in the minority?0 -
ElfsborgAddick said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:ElfsborgAddick said:People that have lived through the 70's and 80's may have a different view from the younger generation.
Jimbo is alright.
Did you find your views in the minority?3 -
i_b_b_o_r_g said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:Was out drinking with Roland this evening - told me he won't sell the club until Jim stops supporting it. He thinks a lot of Jim's material is very dated.
Talks came to a grinding halt.0 -
What was interesting back then was Lenny Henry winning New Faces with a set more racist than anything Jim Davidson has ever done. And I don't think Jim appeared on the Black and White Minstrel show like Lenny did either. I don't think people are too hard on Henry about that now and many would argue that he was doing what he needed to do to be successful - say things the audience of that time felt was funny. My point is not a criticism of Henry but nobody should disect Jim's 70s act and judge him harshly for it.
A lot of racist white people had black mates and would tell them, you are alright, you are an honorary white man! I think some black people as clear minorities in an overtly racist society settled for that. I am glad that isn't acceptable now, but you go online and try to find Lenny Henry's appearances on New Faces and The black and White minstrals and they have been airbrushed from history.0 -
Home James! was alright at the time.0