West Ham
Comments
-
Let's also never forget the way in which they took Defoe from us. You can say that was Redknapp, but it needed to be sanctioned at the highest level. Never heard any of their fans correcting media claiming he was a product of their academy, let alone the disgraceful behaviour that led to Varney going to court to drag a million out of them.3
-
From 1932 to 1958 WHU were in Div 2. Those were mostly great years for CAFC. Remember the story of Bobby Moore as a teenager biking from Barking over the Ferry to study our players ?
0 -
I wasn't aware that PV did this.PragueAddick said:Let's also never forget the way in which they took Defoe from us. You can say that was Redknapp, but it needed to be sanctioned at the highest level. Never heard any of their fans correcting media claiming he was a product of their academy, let alone the disgraceful behaviour that led to Varney going to court to drag a million out of them.
I thought the 'allegations' went along the lines that they bought his mum a house.
0 -
They can take some of Gulivans dildos and go fuck themselves1
-
Yes, I forget what kind of court it was, but the case was that West Ham had broken clear rules on tapping up under-age players. Regarding the allegation, you may think that, but I cannot possibly comment:-) However there was a wonderful C4 drama about a football manager, played by Ray Winstone, and the first scenes depict exactly that. C4 of course never openly suggested that Winstone's character was based on Redknapp...But they chose Winstone and not Gregory Fitoussi, so it certainly wasn't based on Wenger :-)man_at_milletts said:
I wasn't aware that PV did this.PragueAddick said:Let's also never forget the way in which they took Defoe from us. You can say that was Redknapp, but it needed to be sanctioned at the highest level. Never heard any of their fans correcting media claiming he was a product of their academy, let alone the disgraceful behaviour that led to Varney going to court to drag a million out of them.
I thought the 'allegations' went along the lines that they bought his mum a house.
Mind you, speaking of Varney and West Ham, I have never met PV in person, but have always thought, and still do, that he was and remains easily the best CEO Charlton could ever have. So I was gobsmacked to read the first of the new "Voice" presenting a signature interview with him, wherein he declared that the Gullivans were his 'good friends' and he had tried to persuade them to buy us. I can't imagine that the Gullivans would have tried to move us to the OS, but I can only think their only reason for considering it was the possibility of moving us to the Peninsula.
2 -
Only just realised I posted this in the wrong thread. Still, a valid contribution, I'm sure you'll all agree.The Red Robin said:Oasis - Be Here Now
Every Stereophonics album since Language, Sex Violence...
Every Eminem album since The Eminem Show
Kanye - 808s
Every Stone Roses since Stone Roses11 -
That's definitely a reason to hate West Ham.The Red Robin said:
Only just realised I posted this in the wrong thread. Still, a valid contribution, I'm sure you'll all agree.The Red Robin said:Oasis - Be Here Now
Every Stereophonics album since Language, Sex Violence...
Every Eminem album since The Eminem Show
Kanye - 808s
Every Stone Roses since Stone Roses1 -
This certainly doesnt put Bilic in a good light!!
http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11685/11012294/robert-snogdrass-hits-out-at-under-fire-west-ham-boss-slaven-bilic0 -
Philippe Duclos not Fitoussi perhaps (he says, in the contender for most pretentious post of the day).PragueAddick said:
Yes, I forget what kind of court it was, but the case was that West Ham had broken clear rules on tapping up under-age players. Regarding the allegation, you may think that, but I cannot possibly comment:-) However there was a wonderful C4 drama about a football manager, played by Ray Winstone, and the first scenes depict exactly that. C4 of course never openly suggested that Winstone's character was based on Redknapp...But they chose Winstone and not Gregory Fitoussi, so it certainly wasn't based on Wenger :-)man_at_milletts said:
I wasn't aware that PV did this.PragueAddick said:Let's also never forget the way in which they took Defoe from us. You can say that was Redknapp, but it needed to be sanctioned at the highest level. Never heard any of their fans correcting media claiming he was a product of their academy, let alone the disgraceful behaviour that led to Varney going to court to drag a million out of them.
I thought the 'allegations' went along the lines that they bought his mum a house.
Mind you, speaking of Varney and West Ham, I have never met PV in person, but have always thought, and still do, that he was and remains easily the best CEO Charlton could ever have. So I was gobsmacked to read the first of the new "Voice" presenting a signature interview with him, wherein he declared that the Gullivans were his 'good friends' and he had tried to persuade them to buy us. I can't imagine that the Gullivans would have tried to move us to the OS, but I can only think their only reason for considering it was the possibility of moving us to the Peninsula.
Meanwhile, easy to forget how many reasons there are to dislike West Ham, how did I forget the Tevez shennanigans? I suspect they will never be a neutral's favourite again with the whole stadium disgrace2 -
Charlton were 2nd choice, by a very long way and only if they couldn't have got WHam. There was certainly admiration for the way they ran their clubs. We may not like the Taxpayer Stadium deal, but they certainly get the best deals they can.PragueAddick said:
Yes, I forget what kind of court it was, but the case was that West Ham had broken clear rules on tapping up under-age players. Regarding the allegation, you may think that, but I cannot possibly comment:-) However there was a wonderful C4 drama about a football manager, played by Ray Winstone, and the first scenes depict exactly that. C4 of course never openly suggested that Winstone's character was based on Redknapp...But they chose Winstone and not Gregory Fitoussi, so it certainly wasn't based on Wenger :-)man_at_milletts said:
I wasn't aware that PV did this.PragueAddick said:Let's also never forget the way in which they took Defoe from us. You can say that was Redknapp, but it needed to be sanctioned at the highest level. Never heard any of their fans correcting media claiming he was a product of their academy, let alone the disgraceful behaviour that led to Varney going to court to drag a million out of them.
I thought the 'allegations' went along the lines that they bought his mum a house.
Mind you, speaking of Varney and West Ham, I have never met PV in person, but have always thought, and still do, that he was and remains easily the best CEO Charlton could ever have. So I was gobsmacked to read the first of the new "Voice" presenting a signature interview with him, wherein he declared that the Gullivans were his 'good friends' and he had tried to persuade them to buy us. I can't imagine that the Gullivans would have tried to move us to the OS, but I can only think their only reason for considering it was the possibility of moving us to the Peninsula.
I'm sure Daisy does the same!!!1 - Sponsored links:
-
David Gold was at PV's 60th party, so they could be "good friends", then again so was I.PragueAddick said:
Yes, I forget what kind of court it was, but the case was that West Ham had broken clear rules on tapping up under-age players. Regarding the allegation, you may think that, but I cannot possibly comment:-) However there was a wonderful C4 drama about a football manager, played by Ray Winstone, and the first scenes depict exactly that. C4 of course never openly suggested that Winstone's character was based on Redknapp...But they chose Winstone and not Gregory Fitoussi, so it certainly wasn't based on Wenger :-)man_at_milletts said:
I wasn't aware that PV did this.PragueAddick said:Let's also never forget the way in which they took Defoe from us. You can say that was Redknapp, but it needed to be sanctioned at the highest level. Never heard any of their fans correcting media claiming he was a product of their academy, let alone the disgraceful behaviour that led to Varney going to court to drag a million out of them.
I thought the 'allegations' went along the lines that they bought his mum a house.
Mind you, speaking of Varney and West Ham, I have never met PV in person, but have always thought, and still do, that he was and remains easily the best CEO Charlton could ever have. So I was gobsmacked to read the first of the new "Voice" presenting a signature interview with him, wherein he declared that the Gullivans were his 'good friends' and he had tried to persuade them to buy us. I can't imagine that the Gullivans would have tried to move us to the OS, but I can only think their only reason for considering it was the possibility of moving us to the Peninsula.1 -
Bizarre how Snodgrass is now on loan at Villa in the Championship. He'd be a major asset to most bottom half PL teamsForeverAddickted said:This certainly doesnt put Bilic in a good light!!
http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11685/11012294/robert-snogdrass-hits-out-at-under-fire-west-ham-boss-slaven-bilic3 -
Anyone watch them tonight, incredible second half performance to come from 2 down to beat spurs 3-21
-
They were 100/1 at HT0
-
Spurs, West Ham and Chelsea fans all milling around central London around closing time.0
-
Its only the cup that no-ones interested in - least of all, Spurs.0
-
Hopefully will buoy them up big time for their visit to Sellout on Saturday.3
-
I’d take a draw for them on Saturday and hopefully clubs around them could get something.6
-
Think it was a decent chance for a trophy for Spurs to be honest.The_President said:Its only the cup that no-ones interested in - least of all, Spurs.
1 - Sponsored links:
-
what with their involvement in Champions league and Premiership this season, this was a cup too far for them.North Lower Neil said:
Think it was a decent chance for a trophy for Spurs to be honest.The_President said:Its only the cup that no-ones interested in - least of all, Spurs.
2 -
Honestly, and I don't say this lightly, I want to see Spurs win trophies. I hate what football has become. Finishing as high up the league will always take priority due to the funds generated.The_President said:
what with their involvement in Champions league and Premiership this season, this was a cup too far for them.North Lower Neil said:
Think it was a decent chance for a trophy for Spurs to be honest.The_President said:Its only the cup that no-ones interested in - least of all, Spurs.
I could have kicked the cat across the room when they equalised, I nearly threw my laptop through the tv when they got the third. It hurts but we do have bigger fish to fry. Utd on Saturday lunchtime and Real Madrid midweek followed by Ars*nal at the Cameldome. Fully understandable why Poch rotated the squad.
Just wish it wasnt against them. No matter who plays, that second half capitulation was an embarrassment. Goes to show what a presence Lloris, Vertonghen and Sanchez are for us at the moment.
It says a lot that a 3-2 down with 10 mins to go, I'm thinking FFS I'd take the defeat in 90 mins to avoid ET. As it is Utd have got 24hrs extra rest than us before Sat lunchtime. Football should be about winning every bloody game.
Funny Brady was on the Apprentice tonight in the Royal Box at Wembley with a trophy in front of her. That wont happen again any time soon.
Oh and West Ham were great 2nd half. Shame Spurs didnt play with the same will.
9 -
West Ham at the London Stadium - the gift that keeps on giving.7
-
Saw the second half and that was an awful performance, Billic looked like he knows he's gone and players played like they don't care.
Overall an enjoyable 45 minutes watch!!6 -
They were better in the second half !!!!! Truly woeful before the breakChef_addick said:Saw the second half and that was an awful performance, Billic looked like he knows he's gone and players played like they don't care.
Overall an enjoyable 45 minutes watch!!
0 -
MountsfieldPark said:
West Ham at the London Stadium - the gift that keeps on taking.
5 -
Most enjoyable.0
-
Hysterical. Ironically they actually deserve to be playing on waste ground next to a trunk road in Stratford.3
-
-
Why have they have had a fire drill at West Ham's last two home matches after 65 minutes but the away fans are allowed to stay in the ground ?
Sort it out health and safety13