January (2017) Transfer (Rumours) Thread - (Deadline Dayfrom page 67)
Comments
-
Hoping the fact that he looks to be keeping the fox and lookman and not properly reinvesting any of it is a sign he's about to jump ship0
-
I think the opposite, he thinks he can sell and get in cheaper and kr will get us up, he then will repeat with konza and ariboJ BLOCK said:Hoping the fact that he looks to be keeping the fox and lookman and not properly reinvesting any of it is a sign he's about to jump ship
4 -
Yep this.roseandcrown said:
I think the opposite, he thinks he can sell and get in cheaper and kr will get us up, he then will repeat with konza and ariboJ BLOCK said:Hoping the fact that he looks to be keeping the fox and lookman and not properly reinvesting any of it is a sign he's about to jump ship
2 -
We're NOT going up! Get a grip! Robinson was sacked this season at MK Dons with them 19th! We're stuck in a mid table rut!6
-
I can't see that getting the juices going at Premiership clubs- one footed and slow.OhEddieYouds said:Imagine this story has been given to the media by mk dons as they tout Reeves about in a bid to seek an alternative buyer to Charlton.
Hopefully KR has a good back up as I worry he will also follow carruthers by ending up elsewhere in the last week of the window.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-4092592/Ben-Reeves-MK-Dons-man-swap-League-One-Premier-League.html6 -
Lots of interesting comments on here but RUMOURS!?3
-
Neither of them are in the Gomez/Lookman league money wise, so even if he stays and sells them next year he will not recoup his losses for the season. Better he go now - the best chance he has of not losing more than 1.5% of his fortune.roseandcrown said:
I think the opposite, he thinks he can sell and get in cheaper and kr will get us up, he then will repeat with konza and ariboJ BLOCK said:Hoping the fact that he looks to be keeping the fox and lookman and not properly reinvesting any of it is a sign he's about to jump ship
0 -
That's not entirely true, but even if it was the people they are keeping them secret from are the fans, not the people involved in the business of football. It has no effect on the latter at all, because they know anyway.sam3110 said:
But it's not just this regime, it's every club in every division in every country, every one tries to keep transfer fees undisclosed.AddicksAddict said:
And this régime try to keep incoming transfer fees undisclosed, as the previous one did. Now, I don't trust this lot as far as I could kick them, but I can see the sense in this. On the other hand, Katie's "We bid £millions for so-and-so but couldn't get the deal over the line" is just so much hot air.East_Stand_Loopy said:
I'm not. The biggest difference between us and Sheffield United? They hadn't (or were just about to) sell one of their players for £11 million.SDAddick said:
I'd be skeptical of this, I don't know that KR knows any of that for a fact, or if he is speaking literally or metaphorically about players going to Charlton costing him more.Athletico Charlton said:https://www.londonnewsonline.co.uk/14908/charlton-boss-sheffield-united-got-cheaper-deal-got-quoted-mk-midfielder/
Didn't see this elsewhere. Is it just me or since this lot came in as owners have we missed out on more players than usual or do they just like to publicise it More? (This is despite the 200 odd players that have passed through our doors in the 3 years!)
Who was it in the summer that we missed out on despite offering more? Also, I think we offered less to Novak and Ajose, or maybe it was that Champo clubs were after them and we got them.
Add to that the fact that, as we've talked about a lot with the Lookman deal, transfers can come down a lot to how deals are structured, and I wouldn't necessarily put too much weight into this kind of stuff. Same with us bidding low for Moncur in the summer and now Dempsey, I think reported fees can be misleading.
Of course they were going to ask for more. And I don't blame them.4 -
How about "cafc-west is a transexual assassin"?cafc-west said:Lots of interesting comments on here but RUMOURS!?
1 -
Aribo and Konsa's values will continue to rise with experience and games. Their values will be greater if we are in the Championship and RD knows that. He is a businessman with no emotional buy-in to the club (as we are all well aware). But IMO he will not recoup much of his purchase price and/or debt owed to him in League One. Our best hope is promotion and then he will consider selling. All conjecture.Pedro45 said:
Neither of them are in the Gomez/Lookman league money wise, so even if he stays and sells them next year he will not recoup his losses for the season. Better he go now - the best chance he has of not losing more than 1.5% of his fortune.roseandcrown said:
I think the opposite, he thinks he can sell and get in cheaper and kr will get us up, he then will repeat with konza and ariboJ BLOCK said:Hoping the fact that he looks to be keeping the fox and lookman and not properly reinvesting any of it is a sign he's about to jump ship
1 - Sponsored links:
-
He had one good round of flogging off Standard's players and pocketed €20m, then buggered off. So far, he's made nothing out of Charlton, except possibly the interest on his loans and that assumes he can get his loans repaid. As you say, Konsa and Aribo are not going to bring in the same sort of money as Gomez and Lookman, so where's his payday coming from?Pedro45 said:
Neither of them are in the Gomez/Lookman league money wise, so even if he stays and sells them next year he will not recoup his losses for the season. Better he go now - the best chance he has of not losing more than 1.5% of his fortune.roseandcrown said:
I think the opposite, he thinks he can sell and get in cheaper and kr will get us up, he then will repeat with konza and ariboJ BLOCK said:Hoping the fact that he looks to be keeping the fox and lookman and not properly reinvesting any of it is a sign he's about to jump ship
2 -
Source?AddicksAddict said:
How about "cafc-west is a transexual assassin"?cafc-west said:Lots of interesting comments on here but RUMOURS!?
1 -
Charlton related rumours not mere (incorrect) conjecture...!SuperCliveMendonca said:
Source?AddicksAddict said:
How about "cafc-west is a transexual assassin"?cafc-west said:Lots of interesting comments on here but RUMOURS!?
1 -
So, you thought you needed to deny it. Does that move it up from mere conjecture to a rumour? I think it's time to change my name and move to a secure location.cafc-west said:
Charlton related rumours not mere (incorrect) conjecture...!SuperCliveMendonca said:
Source?AddicksAddict said:
How about "cafc-west is a transsexual assassin"?cafc-west said:Lots of interesting comments on here but RUMOURS!?
0 -
Well going through the BBC transfer list and there's only half a dozen transfers with a fee reported next to them, 2 say a reported number and one of the others is 11m for Lookman, despite the fact both us and Everton announced it as undisclosed.Airman Brown said:
That's not entirely true, but even if it was the people they are keeping them secret from are the fans, not the people involved in the business of football. It has no effect on the latter at all, because they know anyway.sam3110 said:
But it's not just this regime, it's every club in every division in every country, every one tries to keep transfer fees undisclosed.AddicksAddict said:
And this régime try to keep incoming transfer fees undisclosed, as the previous one did. Now, I don't trust this lot as far as I could kick them, but I can see the sense in this. On the other hand, Katie's "We bid £millions for so-and-so but couldn't get the deal over the line" is just so much hot air.East_Stand_Loopy said:
I'm not. The biggest difference between us and Sheffield United? They hadn't (or were just about to) sell one of their players for £11 million.SDAddick said:
I'd be skeptical of this, I don't know that KR knows any of that for a fact, or if he is speaking literally or metaphorically about players going to Charlton costing him more.Athletico Charlton said:https://www.londonnewsonline.co.uk/14908/charlton-boss-sheffield-united-got-cheaper-deal-got-quoted-mk-midfielder/
Didn't see this elsewhere. Is it just me or since this lot came in as owners have we missed out on more players than usual or do they just like to publicise it More? (This is despite the 200 odd players that have passed through our doors in the 3 years!)
Who was it in the summer that we missed out on despite offering more? Also, I think we offered less to Novak and Ajose, or maybe it was that Champo clubs were after them and we got them.
Add to that the fact that, as we've talked about a lot with the Lookman deal, transfers can come down a lot to how deals are structured, and I wouldn't necessarily put too much weight into this kind of stuff. Same with us bidding low for Moncur in the summer and now Dempsey, I think reported fees can be misleading.
Of course they were going to ask for more. And I don't blame them.
What I'm getting at is it's not something that can be used to berate the regime with, there's plenty of other shit that sticks, the whole undisclosed thing is just a quirk of the modern game13 -
Agreed, but the regime are still a bunch of shithouses.sam3110 said:
Well going through the BBC transfer list and there's only half a dozen transfers with a fee reported next to them, 2 say a reported number and one of the others is 11m for Lookman, despite the fact both us and Everton announced it as undisclosed.Airman Brown said:
That's not entirely true, but even if it was the people they are keeping them secret from are the fans, not the people involved in the business of football. It has no effect on the latter at all, because they know anyway.sam3110 said:
But it's not just this regime, it's every club in every division in every country, every one tries to keep transfer fees undisclosed.AddicksAddict said:
And this régime try to keep incoming transfer fees undisclosed, as the previous one did. Now, I don't trust this lot as far as I could kick them, but I can see the sense in this. On the other hand, Katie's "We bid £millions for so-and-so but couldn't get the deal over the line" is just so much hot air.East_Stand_Loopy said:
I'm not. The biggest difference between us and Sheffield United? They hadn't (or were just about to) sell one of their players for £11 million.SDAddick said:
I'd be skeptical of this, I don't know that KR knows any of that for a fact, or if he is speaking literally or metaphorically about players going to Charlton costing him more.Athletico Charlton said:https://www.londonnewsonline.co.uk/14908/charlton-boss-sheffield-united-got-cheaper-deal-got-quoted-mk-midfielder/
Didn't see this elsewhere. Is it just me or since this lot came in as owners have we missed out on more players than usual or do they just like to publicise it More? (This is despite the 200 odd players that have passed through our doors in the 3 years!)
Who was it in the summer that we missed out on despite offering more? Also, I think we offered less to Novak and Ajose, or maybe it was that Champo clubs were after them and we got them.
Add to that the fact that, as we've talked about a lot with the Lookman deal, transfers can come down a lot to how deals are structured, and I wouldn't necessarily put too much weight into this kind of stuff. Same with us bidding low for Moncur in the summer and now Dempsey, I think reported fees can be misleading.
Of course they were going to ask for more. And I don't blame them.
What I'm getting at is it's not something that can be used to berate the regime with, there's plenty of other shit that sticks, the whole undisclosed thing is just a quirk of the modern game3 -
If we don't go up this season I think he'll put the club up for sale in the summer and take a hit. What I'm very confident of next season is absolutely zero/minimal incomings if we're still in league onePedro45 said:
Neither of them are in the Gomez/Lookman league money wise, so even if he stays and sells them next year he will not recoup his losses for the season. Better he go now - the best chance he has of not losing more than 1.5% of his fortune.roseandcrown said:
I think the opposite, he thinks he can sell and get in cheaper and kr will get us up, he then will repeat with konza and ariboJ BLOCK said:Hoping the fact that he looks to be keeping the fox and lookman and not properly reinvesting any of it is a sign he's about to jump ship
1 -
I really don't think we can second guess Duchatelet.7
-
New players' shirts numbers according to Dr Kish - Page 2, Watt 7, Forster-Caskey 19, DeSilva 36@KettsDrKish #cafc @CAFCofficial
— CharltonAthMuseum (@CHATHMuseum) January 11, 20174 -
Henry Irving said:
New players' shirts numbers according to Dr Kish - Page 2, Watt 7, Forster-Caskey 19, DeSilva 36@KettsDrKish #cafc @CAFCofficial
— CharltonAthMuseum (@CHATHMuseum) January 11, 2017
Interesting, would've thought Byrne would've been either 2 or 7. Which means he must be 21 as that seems the only lower number that's left.
Watt as number 7 will look odd too. Shame Muldoon has 23 and Aribo 32, but at least this indicates he will be playing as and when he's fit.0 - Sponsored links:
-
A left back wearing no. 2 is all wrong.14
-
As if Tony Watt will still be here by February.3
-
Who is number 3 again? Kashi? Lol0
-
Why hasn't Solly ever taken the number 2 shirt? Does he just prefer his current number?Exiled_Addick said:A left back wearing no. 2 is all wrong.
0 -
Chicksen.Dizzle said:Who is number 3 again? Kashi? Lol
@Lincsaddick I told you JFC would take 19!!!!!! GET IN THERE!!!!!!!
I sort of suspect that no. 7 shirt will go to Reeves at the end of the month but we'll see. A fit and firing Tony Watt would be great but is in no way guaranteed.
Also, should tag @lancashire lad as he's been dying to know, just as I have as I'd like to update my FIFA team.
Side note: how annoying is it that Aribo still isn't in FIFA? Ridiculous.3 -
Dunno, I guess some players just have favourite numbers. I'm old fashioned, but I still like to see the numbers 1 to 11 go to players who play in the positions traditionally assigned to that number.killerandflash said:
Why hasn't Solly ever taken the number 2 shirt? Does he just prefer his current number?Exiled_Addick said:A left back wearing no. 2 is all wrong.
Still, at least we don't have a centre back wearing no. 1 like that time we handed out numbers in alphabetical order.2 -
I'd have thought Byrne takes 2 & JFC takes 7.0
-
KR talked about Byrne being a winger or number 10 rather than a right back.Callumcafc said:I'd have thought Byrne takes 2 & JFC takes 7.
2 -
Chris Eagles has signed for Port Vale, free transfer.2
-
So not a rumour thenCharlton_Stu said:Chris Eagles has signed for Port Vale, free transfer.
4