Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Ba back?

LondonSirClive
LondonSirClive Posts: 106
in General Charlton
Noticed he is playing for the U23s tonight. Wonder what the prospects are for KR to turn him around. Think he could be good at League One level but only if he wants to do it for us... if not, get rid.
«1

Comments

  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,834
    image
  • SantaClaus
    SantaClaus Posts: 7,687
    The black sheep returns?
  • smiffyboy
    smiffyboy Posts: 4,314
    Shoot me down but could be what we are missing in the centre providing his attitude is right
  • CAFCTrev
    CAFCTrev Posts: 6,018
    Back ba?
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 11,006
    Sorry about your stutter, Sir Clive
  • smiffyboy
    smiffyboy Posts: 4,314
    Especially at this level
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,797
    edited December 2016
    Welcolme back to the black sheep......I'll get my coat!
  • ozaddick
    ozaddick Posts: 2,853
    He should be given a run.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,404
    MuttleyCAFC said:

    Welcolme back to the black sheep......I'll get my coat!

    Why, I should hound you off the boards ;)
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,336
    Well worth a go. Maybe in the FA cup replay when the result does not really matter?

  • Sponsored links:



  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,081
    If he's the answer I'm really not sure what the question is...
  • Hovi's Biscuit
    Hovi's Biscuit Posts: 1,717
    https://youtu.be/Db04mQkizds
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,838
    Who is the player we are paying the most for who is should never have been bought in the first place and needs to get a couple of first team games to showcase him for the January transfer window.

    (It's him because tex is an asset that's being wasted)
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,081
    Alwaysneil said:

    Who is the player we are paying the most for who is should never have been bought in the first place and needs to get a couple of first team games to showcase him for the January transfer window.

    (It's him because tex is an asset that's being wasted)

    I'm not sure he's suited to league one football. I'd certainly have Ulvestad in that role ahead of him. As for the holding role he was no good at that so I'd have Crofts comfortably ahead of him.

    I can't see any situation where I'd actually want him in the first team.
  • Atletico Addick
    Atletico Addick Posts: 5,843
    ozaddick said:

    He should be given a run.

    Might help his bid to return to fitness, perhaps a couple of runs!
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,255
    MuttleyCAFC said:

    Welcolme back to the black sheep......I'll get my coat!

    Racist
  • CharltonDave85
    CharltonDave85 Posts: 502
    And I thought things could not get any worse at charlton, God help us
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,404
    KR is already making Slade look like a petty jobsworth what with this and giving Tex a game
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,838
    Didn't say I'd play him. I think he's rubbish. I'd have got rid of him ages ago or more likely never bought him...

    Just trying to provide a question to which playing Ba may be the answer.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,081
    Leuth said:

    KR is already making Slade look like a petty jobsworth what with this and giving Tex a game

    Slade also gave Tex a cup game. I believe this isn't Ba's first u23 appearance of the season. So no different from Slade yet.

    Let's wait and see if Tex plays a league game and if Ba is allowed to train with the senior squad or makes the 18.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,404
    Slade gave Tex a cup game? I don't remember it! But yeah, let's see.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,081
    edited December 2016
    Leuth said:

    Slade gave Tex a cup game? I don't remember it! But yeah, let's see.

    Well it was Checkatrade but yes.

    Well I think so. I'm now having doubts that I may have dreamt it..
  • East_Stand_Loopy
    East_Stand_Loopy Posts: 2,205
    Tex also played in the Kent Senior Cup...
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,072
    East_Stand_Loopy said:

    Tex also played in the Kent Senior Cup...

    Playing a senior pro in just the Checkatrade and Kent Senior Cup is taking the piss!
    cantersaddick said:

    Alwaysneil said:

    Who is the player we are paying the most for who is should never have been bought in the first place and needs to get a couple of first team games to showcase him for the January transfer window.

    (It's him because tex is an asset that's being wasted)

    I'm not sure he's suited to league one football. I'd certainly have Ulvestad in that role ahead of him. As for the holding role he was no good at that so I'd have Crofts comfortably ahead of him.

    I can't see any situation where I'd actually want him in the first team.
    Well considering that Swindon game, where our midfield was Jackson, Crofts, Ulvestad and Foley, I'm staggered that Ba didn't feature IF he was available which is a big if, as it's a farce what's going on with him and Tex.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,081
    killerandflash said:

    East_Stand_Loopy said:

    Tex also played in the Kent Senior Cup...

    Playing a senior pro in just the Checkatrade and Kent Senior Cup is taking the piss!
    cantersaddick said:

    Alwaysneil said:

    Who is the player we are paying the most for who is should never have been bought in the first place and needs to get a couple of first team games to showcase him for the January transfer window.

    (It's him because tex is an asset that's being wasted)

    I'm not sure he's suited to league one football. I'd certainly have Ulvestad in that role ahead of him. As for the holding role he was no good at that so I'd have Crofts comfortably ahead of him.

    I can't see any situation where I'd actually want him in the first team.
    Well considering that Swindon game, where our midfield was Jackson, Crofts, Ulvestad and Foley, I'm staggered that Ba didn't feature IF he was available which is a big if, as it's a farce what's going on with him and Tex.
    The solution to that midfield is wide players either side of Crofts and Freddie. He's not worth a spot ahead of them. We should have used Aribo/Botaka/another youth player to play either side of them.
  • Crusty54
    Crusty54 Posts: 3,247
    Ba played quite well up front at Welling pre season.
  • CyrilDavies
    CyrilDavies Posts: 855
    Alwaysneil said:

    Didn't say I'd play him. I think he's rubbish. I'd have got rid of him ages ago or more likely never bought him...

    Just trying to provide a question to which playing Ba may be the answer.

    Do we have any midfielders?
  • Beardface
    Beardface Posts: 1,132
    In Powell Riga Peters Luzon Fraye Riga Slade Robinson we trust...
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 36,136
    cantersaddick said:

    Alwaysneil said:

    Who is the player we are paying the most for who is should never have been bought in the first place and needs to get a couple of first team games to showcase him for the January transfer window.

    (It's him because tex is an asset that's being wasted)

    I'm not sure he's suited to league one football. I'd certainly have Ulvestad in that role ahead of him. As for the holding role he was no good at that so I'd have Crofts comfortably ahead of him.

    I can't see any situation where I'd actually want him in the first team.
    We're desperately lacking midfield options and have 7 games in the next 3 and a half weeks. If he's actually interested in playing for us then having him available can't do any harm.
  • SOTF
    SOTF Posts: 1,149
    edited December 2016
    Leuth said:

    KR is already making Slade look like a petty jobsworth what with this and giving Tex a game

    KR has been told to use him in emergencies only, hence coming on for Konsa who had a head injury. He certainly didn't choose 'to give him a game'.

Categories

“Marketplace”