Noticed he is playing for the U23s tonight. Wonder what the prospects are for KR to turn him around. Think he could be good at League One level but only if he wants to do it for us... if not, get rid.
Who is the player we are paying the most for who is should never have been bought in the first place and needs to get a couple of first team games to showcase him for the January transfer window.
(It's him because tex is an asset that's being wasted)
Who is the player we are paying the most for who is should never have been bought in the first place and needs to get a couple of first team games to showcase him for the January transfer window.
(It's him because tex is an asset that's being wasted)
I'm not sure he's suited to league one football. I'd certainly have Ulvestad in that role ahead of him. As for the holding role he was no good at that so I'd have Crofts comfortably ahead of him.
I can't see any situation where I'd actually want him in the first team.
Who is the player we are paying the most for who is should never have been bought in the first place and needs to get a couple of first team games to showcase him for the January transfer window.
(It's him because tex is an asset that's being wasted)
I'm not sure he's suited to league one football. I'd certainly have Ulvestad in that role ahead of him. As for the holding role he was no good at that so I'd have Crofts comfortably ahead of him.
I can't see any situation where I'd actually want him in the first team.
Well considering that Swindon game, where our midfield was Jackson, Crofts, Ulvestad and Foley, I'm staggered that Ba didn't feature IF he was available which is a big if, as it's a farce what's going on with him and Tex.
Who is the player we are paying the most for who is should never have been bought in the first place and needs to get a couple of first team games to showcase him for the January transfer window.
(It's him because tex is an asset that's being wasted)
I'm not sure he's suited to league one football. I'd certainly have Ulvestad in that role ahead of him. As for the holding role he was no good at that so I'd have Crofts comfortably ahead of him.
I can't see any situation where I'd actually want him in the first team.
Well considering that Swindon game, where our midfield was Jackson, Crofts, Ulvestad and Foley, I'm staggered that Ba didn't feature IF he was available which is a big if, as it's a farce what's going on with him and Tex.
The solution to that midfield is wide players either side of Crofts and Freddie. He's not worth a spot ahead of them. We should have used Aribo/Botaka/another youth player to play either side of them.
Who is the player we are paying the most for who is should never have been bought in the first place and needs to get a couple of first team games to showcase him for the January transfer window.
(It's him because tex is an asset that's being wasted)
I'm not sure he's suited to league one football. I'd certainly have Ulvestad in that role ahead of him. As for the holding role he was no good at that so I'd have Crofts comfortably ahead of him.
I can't see any situation where I'd actually want him in the first team.
We're desperately lacking midfield options and have 7 games in the next 3 and a half weeks. If he's actually interested in playing for us then having him available can't do any harm.
Comments
(It's him because tex is an asset that's being wasted)
I can't see any situation where I'd actually want him in the first team.
Just trying to provide a question to which playing Ba may be the answer.
Let's wait and see if Tex plays a league game and if Ba is allowed to train with the senior squad or makes the 18.
Well I think so. I'm now having doubts that I may have dreamt it..
PowellRigaPetersLuzonFrayeRigaSladeRobinson we trust...