Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Against League 3 - Club Owner Survey - ROLAND NAMED WORST OWNER IN ENGLISH FOOTBALL (pg 2)

«13

Comments

  • Algarveaddick
    Algarveaddick Posts: 21,191
    Done
  • Done.

    Can't believe how angry you can get typing in a comments box !!
  • CAFC Luke
    CAFC Luke Posts: 229
    All filled out.
  • Pedro45
    Pedro45 Posts: 5,845
    Done
  • Done
  • Done
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 8,666
    Done
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,307
    Done. Easy multiple choice score format. But then gets a bit tricky at the end. Have to use submit button at the bottom, but can also 'post comment' which is confusing. Anyway submission was acknowledged so seems to have gone through.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,182
    Done.
  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,558
    Done.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Addicted
    Addicted Posts: 2,804
    Never heard of 'against league 3' before - survey completed with some flattering comments for our SMT
  • RanTooFar
    RanTooFar Posts: 324
    Done
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,307
    Is there an award in the offing for this? Need to keep it going. Probably competing with Leeds with their bigger fan base.
  • Done
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,072
    Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.
  • stonemuse said:

    Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.

    I'm surprised.

    How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,072

    stonemuse said:

    Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.

    I'm surprised.

    How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?
    The SMT are voting too
  • 1.04 and trending downwards, as far as my contribution is concerned.
  • ME14addick
    ME14addick Posts: 9,768
    Done!

  • Sponsored links:



  • bellz2002
    bellz2002 Posts: 1,364
    Done
  • Fumbluff
    Fumbluff Posts: 10,149

    stonemuse said:

    Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.

    I'm surprised.

    How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?
    This means someone has inadvertently given them a 2/10 on one of the criteria. Tsk. Tsk. Couldn't see the current scores after I'd submitted though, has it changed?
  • johnny73
    johnny73 Posts: 4,567
    Done.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,182
    Fumbluff said:

    stonemuse said:

    Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.

    I'm surprised.

    How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?
    This means someone has inadvertently given them a 2/10 on one of the criteria. Tsk. Tsk. Couldn't see the current scores after I'd submitted though, has it changed?
    That would be me. For the finance question. I mean, we are not going to go into administration whatever else happens. Everyone should read this about our visitors on Saturday.

  • happyvalley
    happyvalley Posts: 8,996
    Done.
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,072

    Fumbluff said:

    stonemuse said:

    Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.

    I'm surprised.

    How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?
    This means someone has inadvertently given them a 2/10 on one of the criteria. Tsk. Tsk. Couldn't see the current scores after I'd submitted though, has it changed?
    That would be me. For the finance question. I mean, we are not going to go into administration whatever else happens. Everyone should read this about our visitors on Saturday.

    Ouch
  • LuckyReds
    LuckyReds Posts: 5,866

    Fumbluff said:

    stonemuse said:

    Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.

    I'm surprised.

    How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?
    This means someone has inadvertently given them a 2/10 on one of the criteria. Tsk. Tsk. Couldn't see the current scores after I'd submitted though, has it changed?
    That would be me. For the finance question. I mean, we are not going to go into administration whatever else happens. Everyone should read this about our visitors on Saturday.

    I did the same.

    Gave them a 5 I think, because financially we're not in trouble - but the way the money has been spent and the debt we're incurring to Roland is still concerning.
  • 5 ffs! The debt is concerning, ffs? You apologist, you!
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,401
    Done with great pleasure.
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,995
    Mea culpa. I gave them a 1 for everything except a 2 for finances as I don't think RD will ever see his investment returned.