Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Katrien sacked?

sammy391
sammy391 Posts: 3,782
edited February 2016 in General Charlton
Filing on companies house , "termination of appointment of Katrien Miere"


https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/02689249/filing-history
«13456730

Comments

  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,966
    Now that is one BEE whose tale I'd love to hear. I do so hope this is true.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    edited February 2016
    5th December?
  • LoOkOuT
    LoOkOuT Posts: 10,856
    No longer a Director.
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 3,782

    5th December?

    Thought the same , but it had only gone through on the 2nd of feb
  • bigstemarra
    bigstemarra Posts: 5,098
    If only......
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    no longer a director... interesting? any idea what this could be about @Airman Brown ?
  • Macronate
    Macronate Posts: 12,892
    the TM01 looks as though it's been signed off by a child.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    sammy391 said:

    5th December?

    Thought the same , but it had only gone through on the 2nd of feb
    Not sure what the date 2nd of Feb refers to as on the pdf attachment the form does say 05/12/2015....
  • LoOkOuT
    LoOkOuT Posts: 10,856
    Can't spell Charlton Athletic correctly in the PDF
  • Sponsored links:



  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,966
    edited February 2016
    Still listed as a director of charlton athletic football company limited.
    Worth keeping an eye on. I wonder what took them so long to file that little gem!

    (No I don't)

    That's a great spot, Sammy!
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    That signature on the form looks like it could be K Miere? She pumped herself lol
  • stackitsteve
    stackitsteve Posts: 12,102
    Still director of holding company too
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 3,782

    Still director of holding company too

    Not Charlton Athletic Holdings LTD she's not
  • IAgree
    IAgree Posts: 1,839
    Just a thought, but could this signify something more than Katrien going? Seems an odd way to get the push!

    Some sort of selling process perhaps?
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 3,782
    IAgree said:

    Just a thought, but could this signify something more than Katrien going? Seems an odd way to get the push!

    Some sort of selling process perhaps?


    Thought similar , just like how they "terminated" slater and co ...
  • Intriguing
  • That list of Directors certainly brings back memories, from when we seemed to gain a new Director every 6 months, when the club managed to find yet another person willing to cough up some money!
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 3,782

    That signature on the form looks like it could be K Miere? She pumped herself lol

    Is indeed KMs signature - its on the Accounts filed
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    The plot fickens
  • Sponsored links:



  • Dippenhall
    Dippenhall Posts: 3,919
    CEO is the face of the company and responsible for carrying out the boards objectives. Doesn't need to be a director and being a director of CAFC gives no power anyway, you rubber stamp the owners orders.

    CEO position is the one that shows where you stand with the board.

    Could be something or nothing, could be the start of removal of her authority, or just RD moving the deckchairs around or she might have resigned for pesonal reason.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948

    CEO is the face of the company and responsible for carrying out the boards objectives. Doesn't need to be a director and being a director of CAFC gives no power anyway, you rubber stamp the owners orders.

    CEO position is the one that shows where you stand with the board.

    Could be something or nothing, could be the start of removal of her authority, or just RD moving the deckchairs around or she might have resigned for pesonal reason.

    Might be coz that house fell on her sister as started in the other thread....
  • cafc_harry
    cafc_harry Posts: 3,360
    Can someone please explain what this means? Would it not have been fairly obvious by now that she'd left seeing as this was originally from December? Or is there some technical stuff that delays it?
  • stackitsteve
    stackitsteve Posts: 12,102
    sammy391 said:

    Still director of holding company too

    Not Charlton Athletic Holdings LTD she's not
    Sorry, was looking at Baton 2010
  • IAgree
    IAgree Posts: 1,839
    edited February 2016
    Can I jump around the house singing " ding dong the witch is dead!" yet??!!
  • I doubt this means anything. She remains a Director of the primary holding company, Baton 2010. I assume it's just a (legal) technicality.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Tax dodge, RD a typical champagne socialist, knew it ffs
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    I am sure that scientists would argue but anyway:

    http://www.writechoice.co.in/writechoice/index.php/2009/06/signatures/

    This video is interesting from 5.50 in.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deYli4yp_iQ
  • IAgree
    IAgree Posts: 1,839

    CEO is the face of the company and responsible for carrying out the boards objectives. Doesn't need to be a director and being a director of CAFC gives no power anyway, you rubber stamp the owners orders.

    CEO position is the one that shows where you stand with the board.

    Could be something or nothing, could be the start of removal of her authority, or just RD moving the deckchairs around or she might have resigned for pesonal reason.

    So basically your saying Katrien had gone and we are probably being taken over by a Charlton-obsessed stonkingly rich Kuwait -based consortium?!!
  • mogodon
    mogodon Posts: 3,406
    Deckchairs. It's a corporate move and nothing to do with her continuing, wretched, unwelcome, destructive presence at the club.