I don't know if one of the signatures is a fake. If it is, it is a very foolhardy thing to do. On the signature itself, well the theory such as it is, is that your handwriting is the real you, and your signature is how you want to project yourself, but is nevertheless revealing. Graphology is quite a big deal on the continent, and certainly in Belgium where job applications are often required to be handwritten. Looking at the links I posted yesterday, the perspective on Katrien's signature (and those features are evident in both signatures) has resonance with how she is perceived by many. Everybody has distinctive handwriting, much more differentiated than star signs for example, and the study of that writing has been explored to the point of quasi science. Personally I think there is some truth in Graphology, certainly much more than Astrology, but the analysis of handwriting is better seen as an indicator rather than a deal breaker. People are often judged by the way they dress, we know that can be a flawed judgement very often, but nevertheless it happens, and in a phenomenological sense it has significance. Indeed forensics respects graphology. If anybody can post some actual Katrien handwriting we can try to analyse it.
If anyone ever says to me 'what's Charlton Life like?' I will show them this post
I don't know if one of the signatures is a fake. If it is, it is a very foolhardy thing to do. On the signature itself, well the theory such as it is, is that your handwriting is the real you, and your signature is how you want to project yourself, but is nevertheless revealing. Graphology is quite a big deal on the continent, and certainly in Belgium where job applications are often required to be handwritten. Looking at the links I posted yesterday, the perspective on Katrien's signature (and those features are evident in both signatures) has resonance with how she is perceived by many. Everybody has distinctive handwriting, much more differentiated than star signs for example, and the study of that writing has been explored to the point of quasi science. Personally I think there is some truth in Graphology, certainly much more than Astrology, but the analysis of handwriting is better seen as an indicator rather than a deal breaker. People are often judged by the way they dress, we know that can be a flawed judgement very often, but nevertheless it happens, and in a phenomenological sense it has significance. Indeed forensics respects graphology. If anybody can post some actual Katrien handwriting we can try to analyse it.
I don't know if one of the signatures is a fake. If it is, it is a very foolhardy thing to do. On the signature itself, well the theory such as it is, is that your handwriting is the real you, and your signature is how you want to project yourself, but is nevertheless revealing. Graphology is quite a big deal on the continent, and certainly in Belgium where job applications are often required to be handwritten. Looking at the links I posted yesterday, the perspective on Katrien's signature (and those features are evident in both signatures) has resonance with how she is perceived by many. Everybody has distinctive handwriting, much more differentiated than star signs for example, and the study of that writing has been explored to the point of quasi science. Personally I think there is some truth in Graphology, certainly much more than Astrology, but the analysis of handwriting is better seen as an indicator rather than a deal breaker. People are often judged by the way they dress, we know that can be a flawed judgement very often, but nevertheless it happens, and in a phenomenological sense it has significance. Indeed forensics respects graphology. If anybody can post some actual Katrien handwriting we can try to analyse it.
If anyone ever says to me 'what's Charlton Life like?' I will show them this post
LMFAO @Garrymanilow not so much at Seth's comments, just the depth and level he's gone to explain the microscopic way in which we are now debating a bit of hearsay.....as Garry Manilow says, only on CL could you get this
I've been doing some digging and feel I can reveal this information.
Perhaps best not revealed when you know the person who will soon know about it is a lawyer. If you're certain it's a cafc fan. After all we know what sort of lengths the witch will go to.
I've been doing some digging and feel I can reveal this information.
Perhaps best not revealed when you know the person who will soon know about it is a lawyer. If you're certain it's a cafc fan. After all we know what sort of lengths the witch will go to.
She'll probably be able to work out that it wasn't her that signed it for herself though without Louis's help, right?
Would love it if she only realises when she needs to do something on Companies House which only a Director can authorise.
KM: I would like to change the Address from The Valley to La Vallée CH: Sorry ma'am but only a Director can authorise that KM: But I am a Director CH: According to our records you signed a Document which forfeited control of being a Director in December 2015 KM: For Roland's sake, those pesky Charlton fans have been at it again
Comments
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/ZVTG_e9YpwnHxBdT5k-eVv0nffY/appointments
Moving deck chairs around on the deck of the Titanic?
She doesn't have to own shares to be a director. In the same way that owning shares doesn't necessarily convey a right to appointment as a director.
Can't infer anything from this with any certainty at all.
I've been doing some digging and feel I can reveal this information.
Well done whoever did that, you are my hero.
I suspect she's pretty wound up by this as it is to be fair...
But whoever it was will be getting a pint from me.
KM: I would like to change the Address from The Valley to La Vallée
CH: Sorry ma'am but only a Director can authorise that
KM: But I am a Director
CH: According to our records you signed a Document which forfeited control of being a Director in December 2015
KM: For Roland's sake, those pesky Charlton fans have been at it again
Trololololol