Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Macauley Gillesphey signs from Plymouth for an undisclosed fee

123457»

Comments

  • edited October 26
    Like most of our CB's, he was signed with a plan to play a 3. There is no doubt his flaws are exacerbated in a 2, but we don't have an obvious replacement for Jones. If we're going to persist with a 4 at the back, its an area N.Jones will need to address in Jan.
  • Like most of our CB's, he was signed with a plan to play a 3. There is no doubt his flaws are exacerbated in a 2, but we don't have an obvious replacement for Jones. If we're going to persist with a 4 at the back, it’s an area N.Jones will need to address in Jan.
    He’s poor in a 3 as well though. Just not a good player. 
  • Too much time losing scraps with strikers, not enough time challenging for the ball. Good header for the goal today though
  • Was getting bullied by Mullin, embarrassing for a centre back Gillesphey’s size 
  • Smithy said:
    Like most of our CB's, he was signed with a plan to play a 3. There is no doubt his flaws are exacerbated in a 2, but we don't have an obvious replacement for Jones. If we're going to persist with a 4 at the back, it’s an area N.Jones will need to address in Jan.
    He’s poor in a 3 as well though. Just not a good player. 
    Good left footed CB's are difficult to come by, they are few and far between. He was good enough to play regularly for a Plymouth side that won the division a couple of years ago. We barely gave a sniff to sides in the first 5/6 games of this season with him playing in a 3. The point is, he wasn't an issue then. In a 2 hes not physical enough, strong enough aerially and is generally far too passive. 
  • Palmer & Mullin were a tough test for Gillesphey & Mitchell today, him scoring aside I genuinely thought he played well especially in the air, hopefully Lloyd Jones comes back into the side sooner than later though
  • Thought he got bullied all game, and his goal masked a poor performance. Don't rate him one bit, in a back 5 or 4. Fair play to Plymouth getting promoted with him, must have had some players around him.
    My thoughts too. Plymouth were in general a side greater than the sum of its parts. But all you have to do is look at his career, who he’s played for and the level and it’ll tell you he’s not a very good player. He’s slow, he’s weak, and apparently technically good but I haven’t seen it.

    Even with Jones back hopefully not too far away, we need another centre back because Potts won’t be here, REG is now cover for right back and isn’t strong in the air, and Zach Mitchell is young and can’t get in the squad. 
  • Should not be near the first team.
  • As I said in the match thread, an English Miguel Llera, he is pony
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited October 27
    I thought we might see Edwards moved to LCB and Small at LB yesterday.  Worth a try?
  • I thought we might see Edwards moved to LCB and Small at LB yesterday.  Worth a try?
    In different circumstances, I think that could happen, but only in a back 3. However, with Ramsay and Watson injured, it means we have just Edwards and Small as full backs in the first team. We aren’t going to have both playing at the same time. It’s going to be makeshift defence for some time until Jones is back and we assess in January.

    Right back was always something that I’ve said needed to be addressed because even though Ramsay has been our best player, an injury meant we didn’t have sufficient depth or quality to combat him being out. We’re going to suffer from it now.
  • Yeah, watching their second goal again, what the *hell* is he doing?? Dobson is approaching Coventry (battle for the ages etc etc), suddenly Macca's like right well I'm getting involved here! Edwards has to come central to mark Macca's man, overload, ricochet, goal. And when it goes in Macca's barely back in the area 
  • Is Potts injured?  Gillesphey has been the weak link in the defense all season.  He is just too slow.  In a 352 jones was able to provide cover.  It is pretty clear we need keep using a 442 to be able to control the midfield and he just isn’t cut out for that formation.  As much as I think it might be a little too soon for z Mitchell to be starting and he isn’t the fastest defender in the world either,  he has to be better than Gillesphey at this point
  • Sage said:
    I thought we might see Edwards moved to LCB and Small at LB yesterday.  Worth a try?
    In different circumstances, I think that could happen, but only in a back 3. However, with Ramsay and Watson injured, it means we have just Edwards and Small as full backs in the first team. We aren’t going to have both playing at the same time. It’s going to be makeshift defence for some time until Jones is back and we assess in January.

    Right back was always something that I’ve said needed to be addressed because even though Ramsay has been our best player, an injury meant we didn’t have sufficient depth or quality to combat him being out. We’re going to suffer from it now.
    We technically have Edun too but I understand why he isn’t fancied by Jones. Hopefully no league match for a couple of weeks allows Watson to shake off a knock and some good tactical work on the training pitch 
  • An Andy Scott signing I believe.  Our January business last year before Jones bought Ramsey and Small in was poor yet again.
    Still waiting for Scott to hold his hands up as he promised.  
    Yeah every dud is his and every good signing is someone else, right?! 

    EVERY player we signed in January, including Ramsay, was BEFORE Jones was appointed manager
  • Is Potts injured?  Gillesphey has been the weak link in the defense all season.  He is just too slow.  In a 352 jones was able to provide cover.  It is pretty clear we need keep using a 442 to be able to control the midfield and he just isn’t cut out for that formation.  As much as I think it might be a little too soon for z Mitchell to be starting and he isn’t the fastest defender in the world either,  he has to be better than Gillesphey at this point
    Yes Potts is injured.

    https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/sport/weve-got-seven-or-eight-massive-injuries-charlton-boss-jones-on-mounting-list-of-unavailable-players/
  • I’m also of the opinion he is poor. 
  • Scoham said:
    Is Potts injured?  Gillesphey has been the weak link in the defense all season.  He is just too slow.  In a 352 jones was able to provide cover.  It is pretty clear we need keep using a 442 to be able to control the midfield and he just isn’t cut out for that formation.  As much as I think it might be a little too soon for z Mitchell to be starting and he isn’t the fastest defender in the world either,  he has to be better than Gillesphey at this point
    Yes Potts is injured.

    https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/sport/weve-got-seven-or-eight-massive-injuries-charlton-boss-jones-on-mounting-list-of-unavailable-players/
    Thought they could have at least got the score correct😀
  • Palmer & Mullin were a tough test for Gillesphey & Mitchell today, him scoring aside I genuinely thought he played well especially in the air, hopefully Lloyd Jones comes back into the side sooner than later though
    100% agree. I would say that was his best performance in a Charlton shirt, he was big and strong, generally won the battles against them.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Quite like the guy. Think he’ll get better as time goes on. 
  • Is Potts injured?  Gillesphey has been the weak link in the defense all season.  He is just too slow.  In a 352 jones was able to provide cover.  It is pretty clear we need keep using a 442 to be able to control the midfield and he just isn’t cut out for that formation.  As much as I think it might be a little too soon for z Mitchell to be starting and he isn’t the fastest defender in the world either,  he has to be better than Gillesphey at this point
    What? At a stroke you would remove one of our most frequent go-to gambits. The aimless high velocity 40 yard cross field punt  ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!