STATBANK: CARLISLE 1-1 CHARLTON

lancashire lad

Many thanks to the 45 Lifers who gave marks
Ascore: 6.01
this was the 1st League match were Alfie May did not have a shot on target
It is also AMB's highest pass % this season

Braziliance

Good work mate, 

How whoscored had the players rated: 

lancashire lad

I find the Whoscored marking rather weird, how do they arrive at the players' marks, without knowing that it is difficult to understand the markings

Braziliance

lancashire lad said:

I find the Whoscored marking rather weird, how do they arrive at the players' marks, without knowing that it is difficult to understand the markings

All based on passes completed, times dribbled past, dribbled etc. 

I like fans stats like this thread as you get a decent understanding. I would have had CBT, Edun and Tennai in my top 3 and it has turned out that way.

As always appreciate the effort you put in with the graphs etc LL, tremendous effort 

killerandflash

Well I thought Cory was easily the MOTM, so prefer the whoscored numbers!

Certainly while at the game, I didn't think Tayo was that good to be ahead of him. Cory scored our goal, hit the woodwork and caused Carlisle lots of problems.

JamesSeed

The table looks upside down compared to most weeks. Got it right though. 

Callumcafc

Good stats thanks

How did Jason Pearce get a yellow card?

lancashire lad

Callumcafc said:

Good stats thanks

How did Jason Pearce get a yellow card?

When he was acting as head coach between managers

aliwibble

killerandflash said:

Well I thought Cory was easily the MOTM, so prefer the whoscored numbers!

Certainly while at the game, I didn't think Tayo was that good to be ahead of him. Cory scored our goal, hit the woodwork and caused Carlisle lots of problems.

There's only .01 in it though, that's basically equivalent to one person giving him 0.5 more than CBT, and everyone else giving the same marks to both of them.

Dazzler21

Fotmob for additional comparison.

The FotMob player rating is calculated based on more than 300 individual stats per player per match from Opta. A match in the per match ratings is any match the participant has been involved in even if he came on as substitute in the last few minutes. A player must have played at least 50% of all matches and at least 90 minutes (for the per 90 stats) to be included in the rankings.

killerandflash

aliwibble said:

killerandflash said:

Well I thought Cory was easily the MOTM, so prefer the whoscored numbers!

Certainly while at the game, I didn't think Tayo was that good to be ahead of him. Cory scored our goal, hit the woodwork and caused Carlisle lots of problems.

There's only .01 in it though, that's basically equivalent to one person giving him 0.5 more than CBT, and everyone else giving the same marks to both of them.

It's more that I thought CBT was significantly better than any other player yesterday. Something backed up by Whoscored and Fotmob, neither of which rated Edun anywhere near him.

Leuth

Edun was really good. Carlisle had signed a RWB who was clearly a cut above what they had before, and he was all set to put on a show, but despite him looking initially good, Edun shut him down and ultimately out 

danny777

Louie Campbell?  Should be Louie Watson.

Perhaps there should be a rule that new signings who have a surname that is already taken by another player have to change it.

lancashire lad

danny777 said:

Louie Campbell?  Should be Louie Watson.

Perhaps there should be a rule that new signings who have a surname that is already taken by another player have to change it.

thanks Danny, correction made