Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Michael Appleton - March 2025 appointed Shrewsbury manager (p124)
Comments
-
Glad you missed out the 'n'GreenWithEnvy said:
Supporting a he club has been a waking nightmare for the past 10 years!!Wheresmeticket? said:
To dream of Michael AppletonGreenWithEnvy said:Think I will go back to bed2 -
No-one knows what holdens contract said . Didn’t Jacko have one where he could get shoved with a low payment if fell below a certain place in the league ? For all we know Holden may have been on a three month notice.Cafc43v3r said:
Including sacking Holden 6 months into a 3 month contract? The cheap option would have been to mot sack him.billysboots said:
the only one I can think of is binning “addicts to victory “ everything else has the cheap option .SELR_addicks said:Would love to know if there has been a single positive decision this 'new ownership' has made since buying our club.
Been one uninspiring move after the next. Proper tinpot stuff.1 -
If he can get the players keeping the ball when in possession, making and receiving passes without taking three touches he's got my support. Because that is what we can't do. Basic football.
0 -
I say let’s get behind this new man. We’ve had too many; it’s all beyond our control anyway. I thought it was going to be a good season…..oh well. I think the idea that one stays away and not attend any games is absolute bollocks by the way.2
-
The rumour was £150k compensation in total between Holden (I’m assuming the majority of it) senda and Shimellbillysboots said:
No-one knows what holdens contract said . Didn’t Jacko have one where he could get shoved with a low payment if fell below a certain place in the league ? For all we know Holden may have been on a three month notice.Cafc43v3r said:
Including sacking Holden 6 months into a 3 month contract? The cheap option would have been to mot sack him.billysboots said:
the only one I can think of is binning “addicts to victory “ everything else has the cheap option .SELR_addicks said:Would love to know if there has been a single positive decision this 'new ownership' has made since buying our club.
Been one uninspiring move after the next. Proper tinpot stuff.0 -
I’m not saying I’m impressed. You’re right that it’s a glaring issue.NabySarr said:
I mean that’s not that impressive that he’s identified that. Would have only had to watch any one of our first 5 league gamesCallumcafc said:Pleased to hear in his interview that he’s already identified weaknesses in set pieces and how we handle transitions / counter attacks.
Attacking he says he wants “possession based” football but not “7-800 passes a game”. “Dominate the ball in the right way, always looking to play forward”.
I’m just glad that SOMEONE is going to try and do something about it. Because it certainly didn’t feel that way over the last month or so.4 -
He is known as Popeye apparently... Takes no fucking about from the players I'm told so could turn out to be what we need to galvanise the squad (especially our defence.) Trying to see the positives...11
-
The big short. Great film.StrikerFirmani said:JamesSeed said:What are the chances of the fanbase being patient if there isn’t an immediate manager bounce?
Whether we like the appointment or not, I think we should try to give him a chance. I’m putting the pitchfork back in the shed.
2 -
Agreed. But given the repeated absence of fans worth £100m+ willing to step in, I’ll settle for wealthy legitimate businessmen who aren’t money launderers, madmen, asset-strippers or narcissists on an ego-trip.Henry Irving said:
Ideally, we'd want to be financially responsible AND flexible enough to invest in the playing side whenever possible.PeanutsMolloy said:
Understood and thanks for clarifying.Henry Irving said:PeanutsMolloy said:
Not you too Henry.Henry Irving said:My initial reaction was "uninspiring. Mid league 1 manager for mid league 1 club.
It's true that Appleton has had success and he is meant to be a good coach, especially with young players but it doesn't scream "we've got billionaires owners with ambition and passion" rather "it's the best we can do on our self-imposed small budget as no one on the up would come so we got a journeyman in".
But on reflection none of that is Appleton's fault.
He is the manager (sod this head coach nonsense) and so I wish him nothing but the best of luck.
And some good luck, with injuries and with emerging talent, is what he will need.
I also hope he can bring in his own backroom team.
There is a half decent squad here to work with when they are all fit, motivated and clear on their roles.
If Appleton can weld them into a team that is greater than the sum of its parts he might bring us some success.
But I fear success for the fans (challenging for promotion and at least a top six finish) may be be different from success for the SMT (cost savings and player sales) and Appleton will be hard pressed to achieve both.
How are cost savings and player sales, without challenging for promotion, "success" for SMT?
You were there when we regularly sold players to plug the financial holes.
It has to be done but it's about timing.
SMT says they'll sell when it optimises the value to CAFC. They could have sold Leaburn already if they were penny pinchers uninterested in promotion. They didn't.
Will they throw stupid money at a promotion challenge? I trust not because it usually backfires, the owners close the wallet permanently and the club ends up worse off.
It takes time.
@PeanutsMolloy
My language was sloppy.
Of course the SMT would like and hope for on the field success as that will increase income
However, I believe that their priority will be staying within the budgetary limitations under which they sold the deal to the beneficial owners.
And those two may not always be mutually inclusive
But is staying within budgetary limitations agreed with owners a bad thing?
There seems to be a presumption here that the Texas Prospectus business plan is Joshua Friedman et al's business plan.
The Texas prospectus was targeted at small-ticket investors who most certainly would not want to or could be relied upon to invest more. Hence the nutso business plan.
Friedman et al are not small-ticket investors.
As experienced private equity investors, I guarantee you they will be expecting to be asked to make measured follow on investments and will anticipate doing so providing the business is heading in the right direction and the specific case is sound.
Of course you run a business as cost-efficiently as possible but not so as to strangle it.
CM's description of the plan of selling young players is to do so not the moment cash is desperately needed but when their value is optimised. That's only possible if the owners are prepared to make further working capital available, as we found a way of doing 1994-98.
We'll see if he and they are true to this promise.
The key difference is, as I see it, is that the owners in 94-98 and beyond, were fans so their priority was, I believe, to progress the club rather than make a profit.
Anyway, good to debate with you as always. We must have drink and put the world/club to rights sometime.
To state the obvious, we need to start to make progress ASAP or, unlike with fans as owners, the wallets will remain shut.
4 -
Do you know that for a fact or did you just swallow the blurb the club put out ?NabySarr said:Positives:
Works well with young players and we have a young squad
Gets good loans from PL teams as they trust him to develop their youngsters (not really a positive for now but for future transfer windows)
Of course he has to work with young players......that's all we have. And until January he'll have no influence on bringing in any loans. And after that no real scope unless a couple go back. He w9nt really have a say about player incomings until June next year. And then he'll have plenty of options as we have the usual 10-12 player churn.
2 - Sponsored links:
-
His Blackpool contract ran until 2026, I bet they are delighted to be let off 3 years of those payments (unless they made a settlement).I was ready to be underwhelmed, and I am..
One day it will be public how close we came to getting LB back - even though “he didn’t apply” and “we never had any contact with him”.I might go a bit Glory Boy and sit out a few games, to see how things are shaping up. If it looks like a mid-table bore fest then I might give it a miss till the new manager comes in May 2024 ish.0 -
Not an appointment to set the pulse racing.Comments from supporters of some of his former teams are not encouraging but, in mitigation, at least Appleton has a fair amount of experience and he may be able to organise our shambolic defence. He does, however, appear to be an uninspiring participant on the managerial merry go round.I expect his three years of success with Charlie Methven’s team, Oxford United, were not a disadvantage in the process, however much Scott was leading the process.The reality is that we’ve fallen a long way and are no longer a particularly attractive proposition, not least because we’ve got through something like 21 managers in the 17 post-Curbs years.3
-
Look at his record with previous clubs. Man City kept sending him players at Lincoln and they aren’t exactly stupid are they? Some of us do know about the game outside of Charlton, I could probably find myself saying the exact same about Appleton in the next manager thread before the club put anything out so it’s definitely not that. It is well known to be one of his strengths by people who know anything about himgolfaddick said:
Do you know that for a fact or did you just swallow the blurb the club put out ?NabySarr said:Positives:
Works well with young players and we have a young squad
Gets good loans from PL teams as they trust him to develop their youngsters (not really a positive for now but for future transfer windows)
Of course he has to work with young players......that's all we have. And until January he'll have no influence on bringing in any loans. And after that no real scope unless a couple go back. He w9nt really have a say about player incomings until June next year. And then he'll have plenty of options as we have the usual 10-12 player churn.2 -
In fact here is something I read earlier this week from NTT20 substack on which clubs get the best loan players. So from a neutral before the club even appointed him. I’m definitely not one to swallow club bullshit, I just know a bit about football outside of just the Charlton bubblegolfaddick said:
Do you know that for a fact or did you just swallow the blurb the club put out ?NabySarr said:Positives:
Works well with young players and we have a young squad
Gets good loans from PL teams as they trust him to develop their youngsters (not really a positive for now but for future transfer windows)
Of course he has to work with young players......that's all we have. And until January he'll have no influence on bringing in any loans. And after that no real scope unless a couple go back. He w9nt really have a say about player incomings until June next year. And then he'll have plenty of options as we have the usual 10-12 player churn.Some, you already know about. Michael Appleton’s reputation for developing loanees is well-founded. His peak in that regard was 2020/21, when loanees Brennan Johnson (19 upon arrival), Morgan Rogers (18) and TJ Eyoma (20) helped his Lincoln side to reach the League One play-off final, which they’d ultimately lose to Blackpool. In their first-ever loan spells, Johnson started 41 league games and Eyoma 37, with Rogers making 26 line-ups despite joining only in January. Callum Morton(20) and Robbie Gotts (20) also pitched in as upstart temps, while on-loan Alex Palmer played 48 matches in nets, but he was 24 so he’s effectively dead to us.
Rogers and Johnson, in particular, catapulted themselves into the limelight as well as the Imps into a play-off final: the former earned an upper-Championship loan and the latter went straight into Nottingham Forest’s first team, then to the Premier League, then to Tottenham. How do you like them, Apples?
After that, it wasn’t surprising that football’s self-anointed royalty trusted Appleton to handle their crown jewels. Manchester City, the mutual beneficiaries of Rogers’ impressive Imps spell, gave him Lewis Fiorini (19) at Lincoln and again at Blackpool, following Appleton’s appointment there in 2022, and also sent Rogers to Bloomfield Road shortly before the loan whisperer was sacked. Arsenal endowed Appleton with 18-year-olds Brooke Norton-Cuffy (Lincoln) and Charlie Patino (Blackpool), and Liverpool handed 21-year-old Rhys Williams to his Tangerines for a time. Wherever Appleton turns up next, we can expect some elite prospects to follow.
6 -
That’ll suit Methvan and Scott, as they don’t want the head coach too comfy with the supporters.Chunes said:
A few comments in there saying that Appleton doesn't bother trying to build a connection with the fans.Hertsseasider said:A view from the Seaside if you can be arsed
https://avftt.co.uk/index.php?threads/appleton-charlton-manager.46645/
Some of ours will be pleased with that. Won't be seeing him in The Oak.0 -
Man City sent us a striker a couple of weeks ago and we didn’t have a manager !NabySarr said:
Look at his record with previous clubs. Man City kept sending him players at Lincoln and they aren’t exactly stupid are they? Some of us do know about the game outside of Charlton, I could probably find myself saying the exact same about Appleton in the next manager thread before the club put anything out so it’s definitely not that. It is well known to be one of his strengths by people who know anything about himgolfaddick said:
Do you know that for a fact or did you just swallow the blurb the club put out ?NabySarr said:Positives:
Works well with young players and we have a young squad
Gets good loans from PL teams as they trust him to develop their youngsters (not really a positive for now but for future transfer windows)
Of course he has to work with young players......that's all we have. And until January he'll have no influence on bringing in any loans. And after that no real scope unless a couple go back. He w9nt really have a say about player incomings until June next year. And then he'll have plenty of options as we have the usual 10-12 player churn.Valiantphil said:His Blackpool contract ran until 2026, I bet they are delighted to be let off 3 years of those payments (unless they made a settlement).I was ready to be underwhelmed, and I am..
One day it will be public how close we came to getting LB back - even though “he didn’t apply” and “we never had any contact with him”.I might go a bit Glory Boy and sit out a few games, to see how things are shaping up. If it looks like a mid-table bore fest then I might give it a miss till the new manager comes in May 2024 ish.1 -
that makes it more positive than mostGarrymanilow said:I think this is the most apathetic I’ve ever felt about a Charlton managerial appointment. Even with Fraeye and Luzon I was enraged or laughing my arse off at how ridiculous it was. This is just nothing0 -
They probably care a lot less about a 23 year old that is obviously not going to make itbillysboots said:
Man City sent us a striker a couple of weeks ago and we didn’t have a manager !NabySarr said:
Look at his record with previous clubs. Man City kept sending him players at Lincoln and they aren’t exactly stupid are they? Some of us do know about the game outside of Charlton, I could probably find myself saying the exact same about Appleton in the next manager thread before the club put anything out so it’s definitely not that. It is well known to be one of his strengths by people who know anything about himgolfaddick said:
Do you know that for a fact or did you just swallow the blurb the club put out ?NabySarr said:Positives:
Works well with young players and we have a young squad
Gets good loans from PL teams as they trust him to develop their youngsters (not really a positive for now but for future transfer windows)
Of course he has to work with young players......that's all we have. And until January he'll have no influence on bringing in any loans. And after that no real scope unless a couple go back. He w9nt really have a say about player incomings until June next year. And then he'll have plenty of options as we have the usual 10-12 player churn.Valiantphil said:His Blackpool contract ran until 2026, I bet they are delighted to be let off 3 years of those payments (unless they made a settlement).I was ready to be underwhelmed, and I am..
One day it will be public how close we came to getting LB back - even though “he didn’t apply” and “we never had any contact with him”.I might go a bit Glory Boy and sit out a few games, to see how things are shaping up. If it looks like a mid-table bore fest then I might give it a miss till the new manager comes in May 2024 ish.0 -
Underwhelmed but was not expecting much. Michael , just don't come around the Oak until you have won 6 games on the trot.0
-
I loved the Charlton fans aren't cry babies and will give him time comments. Im crying and expect instant results from thisCallumcafc said:
Ah so that explains a lot of Blackpool vitriol… he used to play for Preston.Hertsseasider said:A view from the Seaside if you can be arsed
https://avftt.co.uk/index.php?threads/appleton-charlton-manager.46645/
In between all the comments about him being ex-Preston and not building connection with the fans (we’ve had plenty of that and failed recently), there’s a couple of comments in there about good football and games where your team, being underdogs, should have got more results from their performances.
Sadly looks like Appleton might have less time here to win fans over than he did at your place.
mediocre appointment2 - Sponsored links:
-
Using under 21 as the benchmark:golfaddick said:
Do you know that for a fact or did you just swallow the blurb the club put out ?NabySarr said:Positives:
Works well with young players and we have a young squad
Gets good loans from PL teams as they trust him to develop their youngsters (not really a positive for now but for future transfer windows)
Of course he has to work with young players......that's all we have. And until January he'll have no influence on bringing in any loans. And after that no real scope unless a couple go back. He w9nt really have a say about player incomings until June next year. And then he'll have plenty of options as we have the usual 10-12 player churn.
Isted-26
AMB-24
Jones-27
TT-27
Hector-31
Ness-21 Young player
Assimwe-18 Young player
T Watson-26 ("Watson 26" bring back some bad memories)
Edun-25
Dobbo-25
Camara-26
May-30
Fraser-28
Leaburn-19 Young player
Taylor-22
Abankwah-19 Young Player
Kirk-25
McGrandles-27
T. Campbell-19 Young Player
Aneke-30
CBT-25
L Watson-22
Deji-20 next week Young player
C. Campbell-20 Young Player
Chin-20 Young player
Kanu-18 Young player
Tedic-23
Anderson-18 Young player
There are some young players in the squad, but it's by no means "the only players we have." Just because Holden decided to start five teenagers a couple of weeks ago doesn't mean that's what our squad is made up of. Also, looking at those young players, Chin won't make many league matchday squads, I think Deji and Kanu will struggle to make the squad. I wonder if it will be two from three of Assimwe, Watson, and Abankwah, which would mean another 18 year old missing out.
What you're left with is some young players, some predigious, like Miles and TC, to a lesser extent (at this moment) Anderson and Asiimwe (could maybe put Ness in there). C Campbell has looked very good since joining. Ness is still younger and less experienced than many realize. But I would say about half of our young players are on the fringes of the squad.3 -
Our fan base is definitely not patient enough for that.Major said:Just saying... maybe give the guy a chance?
"Oxford fan here. MApp is held in high esteem at our club. After a shaky first season, he delivered two great seasons. We had Lundstram and Roofe in a League 2 side!
"What he does need is time. For a quick fix, he’s not your man and I suspect things will stay mediocre until the next transfer window. Give him long enough and he can thrive.
"See his spell at Lincoln too. Slow start, but improved".5 -
If they are on the fringes now then that doesn’t mean that with good coaching they won’t become key players next season or the year after. Grant, Aribo, Dijksteel, Phillips were all on the fringes in the seasons before we got promoted last time but developed into key playersSDAddick said:
Using under 21 as the benchmark:golfaddick said:
Do you know that for a fact or did you just swallow the blurb the club put out ?NabySarr said:Positives:
Works well with young players and we have a young squad
Gets good loans from PL teams as they trust him to develop their youngsters (not really a positive for now but for future transfer windows)
Of course he has to work with young players......that's all we have. And until January he'll have no influence on bringing in any loans. And after that no real scope unless a couple go back. He w9nt really have a say about player incomings until June next year. And then he'll have plenty of options as we have the usual 10-12 player churn.
Isted-26
AMB-24
Jones-27
TT-27
Hector-31
Ness-21 Young player
Assimwe-18 Young player
T Watson-26 ("Watson 26" bring back some bad memories)
Edun-25
Dobbo-25
Camara-26
May-30
Fraser-28
Leaburn-19 Young player
Taylor-22
Abankwah-19 Young Player
Kirk-25
McGrandles-27
T. Campbell-19 Young Player
Aneke-30
CBT-25
L Watson-22
Deji-20 next week Young player
C. Campbell-20 Young Player
Chin-20 Young player
Kanu-18 Young player
Tedic-23
Asiimwe-18 Young player
Anderson-18 Young player
There are some young players in the squad, but it's by no means "the only players we have." Just because Holden decided to start five teenagers a couple of weeks ago doesn't mean that's what our squad is made up of. Also, looking at those young players, Chin won't make many league matchday squads, I think Deji and Kanu will struggle to make the squad. I wonder if it will be two from three of Assimwe, Watson, and Abankwah, which would mean another 18 year old missing out.
What you're left with is some young players, some predigious, like Miles and TC, to a lesser extent (at this moment) Anderson and Asiimwe (could maybe put Ness in there). C Campbell has looked very good since joining. Ness is still younger and less experienced than many realize. But I would say about half of our young players are on the fringes of the squad.2 -
Pip Guardiola.SELR_addicks said:Is he the best manager with a fruit in his name though?2 -
Not sure how much they can claim these are elite loanees and he helped them develop...? Some of these players are now at the likes of Barrow, Lincoln and Forest Green Rovers. Others are still in the U23's or out on loan. I feel like we've had better loanees than this list.NabySarr said:
In fact here is something I read earlier this week from NTT20 substack on which clubs get the best loan players. So from a neutral before the club even appointed him. I’m definitely not one to swallow club bullshit, I just know a bit about football outside of just the Charlton bubblegolfaddick said:
Do you know that for a fact or did you just swallow the blurb the club put out ?NabySarr said:Positives:
Works well with young players and we have a young squad
Gets good loans from PL teams as they trust him to develop their youngsters (not really a positive for now but for future transfer windows)
Of course he has to work with young players......that's all we have. And until January he'll have no influence on bringing in any loans. And after that no real scope unless a couple go back. He w9nt really have a say about player incomings until June next year. And then he'll have plenty of options as we have the usual 10-12 player churn.Some, you already know about. Michael Appleton’s reputation for developing loanees is well-founded. His peak in that regard was 2020/21, when loanees Brennan Johnson (19 upon arrival), Morgan Rogers (18) and TJ Eyoma (20) helped his Lincoln side to reach the League One play-off final, which they’d ultimately lose to Blackpool. In their first-ever loan spells, Johnson started 41 league games and Eyoma 37, with Rogers making 26 line-ups despite joining only in January. Callum Morton(20) and Robbie Gotts (20) also pitched in as upstart temps, while on-loan Alex Palmer played 48 matches in nets, but he was 24 so he’s effectively dead to us.
Rogers and Johnson, in particular, catapulted themselves into the limelight as well as the Imps into a play-off final: the former earned an upper-Championship loan and the latter went straight into Nottingham Forest’s first team, then to the Premier League, then to Tottenham. How do you like them, Apples?
After that, it wasn’t surprising that football’s self-anointed royalty trusted Appleton to handle their crown jewels. Manchester City, the mutual beneficiaries of Rogers’ impressive Imps spell, gave him Lewis Fiorini (19) at Lincoln and again at Blackpool, following Appleton’s appointment there in 2022, and also sent Rogers to Bloomfield Road shortly before the loan whisperer was sacked. Arsenal endowed Appleton with 18-year-olds Brooke Norton-Cuffy (Lincoln) and Charlie Patino (Blackpool), and Liverpool handed 21-year-old Rhys Williams to his Tangerines for a time. Wherever Appleton turns up next, we can expect some elite prospects to follow.
This NTT20 stuff is starting to get on my nerves a bit. I like the two guys and their content but remember it's just the opinions of two blokes.0 -
Absolutely. I wish we had sent Deji on loan, but poor form at CB before the window may have closed off a L2 loan. i think he's ready for L2, but he's in kind of an awkward position of being good enough to step into the first team as needed, but not so good he's banging the door down.NabySarr said:
If they are on the fringes now then that doesn’t mean that with good coaching they won’t become key players next season or the year after. Grant, Aribo, Dijksteel, Phillips were all on the fringes in the seasons before we got promoted last time but developed into key playersSDAddick said:
Using under 21 as the benchmark:golfaddick said:
Do you know that for a fact or did you just swallow the blurb the club put out ?NabySarr said:Positives:
Works well with young players and we have a young squad
Gets good loans from PL teams as they trust him to develop their youngsters (not really a positive for now but for future transfer windows)
Of course he has to work with young players......that's all we have. And until January he'll have no influence on bringing in any loans. And after that no real scope unless a couple go back. He w9nt really have a say about player incomings until June next year. And then he'll have plenty of options as we have the usual 10-12 player churn.
Isted-26
AMB-24
Jones-27
TT-27
Hector-31
Ness-21 Young player
Assimwe-18 Young player
T Watson-26 ("Watson 26" bring back some bad memories)
Edun-25
Dobbo-25
Camara-26
May-30
Fraser-28
Leaburn-19 Young player
Taylor-22
Abankwah-19 Young Player
Kirk-25
McGrandles-27
T. Campbell-19 Young Player
Aneke-30
CBT-25
L Watson-22
Deji-20 next week Young player
C. Campbell-20 Young Player
Chin-20 Young player
Kanu-18 Young player
Tedic-23
Asiimwe-18 Young player
Anderson-18 Young player
There are some young players in the squad, but it's by no means "the only players we have." Just because Holden decided to start five teenagers a couple of weeks ago doesn't mean that's what our squad is made up of. Also, looking at those young players, Chin won't make many league matchday squads, I think Deji and Kanu will struggle to make the squad. I wonder if it will be two from three of Assimwe, Watson, and Abankwah, which would mean another 18 year old missing out.
What you're left with is some young players, some predigious, like Miles and TC, to a lesser extent (at this moment) Anderson and Asiimwe (could maybe put Ness in there). C Campbell has looked very good since joining. Ness is still younger and less experienced than many realize. But I would say about half of our young players are on the fringes of the squad.
I suspect Kanu will go to the National League at some point-and I think that's the next logical step for him. Same for Chin-who I don't have high hopes for.
I think Anderson and Asiimwe showed enough in pre-season and in the first couple of matches that they can be in and around the first team. They just need to be relied upon a lot less. I still have high hopes for both, and some of the mistakes they've made have been down to being given too much too soon. There may come a time when neither of them make a matchday 18, and at this point, I think that's okay because it means we have better players.
Miles and the Campbells look solid first team players, I don't think that's in much dispute. I feel like we've seen some regression from Ness, which I expected, but there is potential there and I feel like with better players and a better coached team, we'll see him improve.
Abankwah is a real wild card, but he comes with good pedigree from a club very good at spotting young talent. I think one loan per season should be reserved for someone like that. And he's not first choice, so he should have time to adapt.
I actually like our strategy with young players much better this season. Sending Henry and Mitchell on loan was important for both of their progressions. Like I said, I would have liked Deji in there as well, but given how we started the season I get why he's not, and he could always go somewhere for the second half when we have fewer cup games. I think Asiimwe and Anderson are decent enough to spend time with the first team right now. It might be a case with Miles and Campbell last season where you see glimpses but you also get a feeling of "too much too soon" at first, only for them to blossom as the season goes on. Kind of a free hit for them, again with the problem being both have started all of our league games.2 -
You’ve picked out 2 that didn’t play much and were only there for half a season. The rest now play at least at the same level and others at a higher level. Gotts is the only one that went down a level after working with Appleton.Chunes said:
Not sure how much they can claim these are elite loanees and he helped them develop...? Some of these players are now at the likes of Barrow, Lincoln and Forest Green Rovers. Others are still in the U23's or out on loan. I feel like we've had better loanees than this list.NabySarr said:
In fact here is something I read earlier this week from NTT20 substack on which clubs get the best loan players. So from a neutral before the club even appointed him. I’m definitely not one to swallow club bullshit, I just know a bit about football outside of just the Charlton bubblegolfaddick said:
Do you know that for a fact or did you just swallow the blurb the club put out ?NabySarr said:Positives:
Works well with young players and we have a young squad
Gets good loans from PL teams as they trust him to develop their youngsters (not really a positive for now but for future transfer windows)
Of course he has to work with young players......that's all we have. And until January he'll have no influence on bringing in any loans. And after that no real scope unless a couple go back. He w9nt really have a say about player incomings until June next year. And then he'll have plenty of options as we have the usual 10-12 player churn.Some, you already know about. Michael Appleton’s reputation for developing loanees is well-founded. His peak in that regard was 2020/21, when loanees Brennan Johnson (19 upon arrival), Morgan Rogers (18) and TJ Eyoma (20) helped his Lincoln side to reach the League One play-off final, which they’d ultimately lose to Blackpool. In their first-ever loan spells, Johnson started 41 league games and Eyoma 37, with Rogers making 26 line-ups despite joining only in January. Callum Morton(20) and Robbie Gotts (20) also pitched in as upstart temps, while on-loan Alex Palmer played 48 matches in nets, but he was 24 so he’s effectively dead to us.
Rogers and Johnson, in particular, catapulted themselves into the limelight as well as the Imps into a play-off final: the former earned an upper-Championship loan and the latter went straight into Nottingham Forest’s first team, then to the Premier League, then to Tottenham. How do you like them, Apples?
After that, it wasn’t surprising that football’s self-anointed royalty trusted Appleton to handle their crown jewels. Manchester City, the mutual beneficiaries of Rogers’ impressive Imps spell, gave him Lewis Fiorini (19) at Lincoln and again at Blackpool, following Appleton’s appointment there in 2022, and also sent Rogers to Bloomfield Road shortly before the loan whisperer was sacked. Arsenal endowed Appleton with 18-year-olds Brooke Norton-Cuffy (Lincoln) and Charlie Patino (Blackpool), and Liverpool handed 21-year-old Rhys Williams to his Tangerines for a time. Wherever Appleton turns up next, we can expect some elite prospects to follow.
This NTT20 stuff is starting to get on my nerves a bit. I like the two guys and their content but remember it's just the opinions of two blokes.Yes we got better loans, but that’s because we are a better club with more money. It’s more highlighting that the Man City’s, Arsenals, Liverpools etc trust Appleton with their players because he’s a good coach and has a good record with young player’s development2 -
The transfer window and new manager tell us everything we need to know about the new owners. Another season of poor football and a mid table finish if we're lucky. Or perhaps Appleton can perform a miracle, it's the hope that kills one.4
-
I wouldn't feel comfortable with Scott as my boss.
Scott distinguished himself from the head coach by mentioning the 'man on the grass' five times in his interview. It is the responsibility of the 'man on the grass' to meld together the ragtag set of players that he himself has bought through the door.
I can't see Scott ever falling on his own sword, when he can simply pull rank and blame the 'man on the grass'.3 -
Not my first or even second choice, but I can’t remember a more unfair, un Charlton and hostile response and some of the comments are just plain old nasty and frankly ignorant. He has been built into a figure of ridicule over his less than photogenic qualities and demonised by some on here.
He does have relevant experience and has had success at clubs where he’s been backed by owners - I don’t count the Blackpool job because they were past redemption. He may well not turn this about but let’s all remember why we are in this situation and that the last four owners have run the club into the ground.
As for not chanting Appletons Red Army….Words fail me. Have we descended so far?22
