Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

STATBANK: CHARLTON 0-1 CHELTENHAM

thanks to the 62 Lifers who gave marks, apologies for the late publication







Comments

  • Options
    TEL said:
    Rough again on Morgan. He really wasnt that bad. 
    He certainly wasn't worse than Fraser.  Dobson wasn't worse than 7 either.  
  • Options
    TEL said:
    Rough again on Morgan. He really wasnt that bad. 
    He was! I can't remember much that he did that was good other than entertain us with his attempt at clearing the roof of the jimmy Seed Stand. All else pales into insignificance when compared to that shot.
  • Options
    TEL said:
    Rough again on Morgan. He really wasnt that bad. 
    Agreed. That shot was hilarious, but ridiculous the way he's been pilloried for it. 
  • Options
    Does MacGilivary get an assist?
  • Options
    TEL said:
    Rough again on Morgan. He really wasnt that bad. 
    He was! I can't remember much that he did that was good other than entertain us with his attempt at clearing the roof of the jimmy Seed Stand. All else pales into insignificance when compared to that shot.
    No. It doesn't. This ridiculous attitude proves the bias many of you have.
  • Options
    Dazzler21 said:
    TEL said:
    Rough again on Morgan. He really wasnt that bad. 
    He was! I can't remember much that he did that was good other than entertain us with his attempt at clearing the roof of the jimmy Seed Stand. All else pales into insignificance when compared to that shot.
    No. It doesn't. This ridiculous attitude proves the bias many of you have.
    Can only base it on what you see in the flesh in my view. Some of the marking is on the edge of farce with players grossly over and under marked in games I’ve witnessed this season. 
  • Options
    shirty5 said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    TEL said:
    Rough again on Morgan. He really wasnt that bad. 
    He was! I can't remember much that he did that was good other than entertain us with his attempt at clearing the roof of the jimmy Seed Stand. All else pales into insignificance when compared to that shot.
    No. It doesn't. This ridiculous attitude proves the bias many of you have.
    Can only base it on what you see in the flesh in my view. Some of the marking is on the edge of farce with players grossly over and under marked in games I’ve witnessed this season. 
    yes Shirty but that is just your opinion, other's have different and so different marking, it would be rather pleasant if you could all just accept each other's marks and not keep criticising
  • Options
    shirty5 said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    TEL said:
    Rough again on Morgan. He really wasnt that bad. 
    He was! I can't remember much that he did that was good other than entertain us with his attempt at clearing the roof of the jimmy Seed Stand. All else pales into insignificance when compared to that shot.
    No. It doesn't. This ridiculous attitude proves the bias many of you have.
    Can only base it on what you see in the flesh in my view. Some of the marking is on the edge of farce with players grossly over and under marked in games I’ve witnessed this season. 
    yes Shirty but that is just your opinion, other's have different and so different marking, it would be rather pleasant if you could all just accept each other's marks and not keep criticising
    I will crack on as I always do on here 
  • Options
    edited December 2022
    28 players used and we aren't even half way through the season, with five full months of the season to go. No team can gain any sort of consistency when the starting XI is constantly having to be changed not just because of injuries but also because we do not have a standout 14 or 15 players - so many of them are much of a muchness and not good enough to get us out of the division.  
  • Options
    28 players used and we aren't even half way through the season, with five full months of the season to go. No team can gain any sort of consistency when the starting XI is constantly having to be changed not just because of injuries but also because we do not have a standout 14 or 15 players - so many of them are much of a muchness and not good enough to get us out of the division.  
    This is a very good point. Steve Gallen's mantra has always been 2 players for every position. I suspect this dilutes our ability when compared to a strong eleven with a few versatile extras. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!