Just skimming them. The reviews are largely positive. A lot of the negative reviews come from sales people. There's some talk of fraud and lack of clarity in billing and reimbursement. That would make them...like literally every other for-profit entity in US Healthcare. Seriously, so much of US healthcare is profiting off of sickness, and it can't be stressed enough how awful some of the people involved are.
It's very possible that there is actual fraud, but it is also very possible that the subtleties and nuances of the incredibly opaque and oftentimes awful US healthcare insurance and reimbursement systems are not being fully explained to sales reps making $38k/year. Or both. Things are better here than they were 15 years ago, but there are still a lot of things (especially in some states with fewer patient protections) that make you go "wait, that's legal?" But it is. So long story short, it's really hard to say.
There seems to be some allusions to UnitedHealthcare suing Zynex. I can't find anything about that in a quick Google search, but United is removing Zynex from their approved list, which means a big loss in revenue.
Look, I hate to say "I told you so" about him, but when I heard "Medical device manufacturing and sales" I had a pretty good idea of who this guy was. Between that and the discrimination lawsuit, you get a good picture of who Sandgaard is. He got very rich through charm and labor exploitation from a byzantine system that trades on sickness and death. In my time in private sector Healthcare IT, I've run across this kind of dude (usually European and oftentimes English) a few times. He is always a cynical cunt at heart.
Could we do better? Yes. Do we deserve better? Yes. But could we do worse? Absolutely, and I think if TS ever were to go away, or even want to go away, we'd be far more likely to do worse than better. That's not to say "don't push for change," it's more to try to context set the situation we're in.
Do you have a Glassdoor account - I can’t be bothered to open one, but it looked like they’d just had an annual “give us a good review” day in the office. Lots of reviews from Friday, which seemed a bit odd, but then I ran out of free views.
Do you have a Glassdoor account - I can’t be bothered to open one, but it looked like they’d just had an annual “give us a good review” day in the office. Lots of reviews from Friday, which seemed a bit odd, but then I ran out of free views.
Yeah there are a lot that say "this is my first day and I love it already" or something of the sort. It's quite strange.
Do you have a Glassdoor account - I can’t be bothered to open one, but it looked like they’d just had an annual “give us a good review” day in the office. Lots of reviews from Friday, which seemed a bit odd, but then I ran out of free views.
Yeah there are a lot that say "this is my first day and I love it already" or something of the sort. It's quite strange.
Do you have a Glassdoor account - I can’t be bothered to open one, but it looked like they’d just had an annual “give us a good review” day in the office. Lots of reviews from Friday, which seemed a bit odd, but then I ran out of free views.
Yeah there are a lot that say "this is my first day and I love it already" or something of the sort. It's quite strange.
With the turnover of staff they appear to have, maybe they've thrown a load of false reviews in just to get people through the door?
That's a wild conspiracy theory, to put it kindly. TS's long-term aim is to develop land he doesn't even own, by running down the asset that he does. Ha!
That's a wild conspiracy theory, to put it kindly. TS's long-term aim is to develop land he doesn't even own, by running down the asset that he does. Ha!
It is plausible unfortunately in this day an age whether by intended calculation (I don't think that's the case at all) or by circumstance ie floundering in league one or lower hemorrhaging millions each season.
Being a Charlton fan is brief respite during enduring periods of turbulence. The seat belt sign never turns off.
Anyone hear that TS has had to borrow money this month to pay wage bill or some of it? Don't know how true this is.. 300K
Not heard that and no idea, but I'm sceptical. We haven't won in six league games now, so some will want more ammunition to fire at the owner, even if those particular bullets should prove to be blanks. From whom did you hear that if I might ask? Was it someone ITK?
What's he trying to achieve with that? Points b) c) d) are flawed in my opinion. If you want to build yet more flats look first at the soulless shopping areas north of the Woolwich Rd. Greenwich council would have a fight to grant planning permission. Who would buy a loss making 'club' to play their home games somewhere unrelated to their ancestral home?
That's a wild conspiracy theory, to put it kindly. TS's long-term aim is to develop land he doesn't even own, by running down the asset that he does. Ha!
It is plausible unfortunately in this day an age whether by intended calculation (I don't think that's the case at all) or by circumstance ie floundering in league one or lower hemorrhaging millions each season.
Being a Charlton fan is brief respite during enduring periods of turbulence. The seat belt sign never turns off.
Clearly wants to be a presenter from that evidence…
We’ll end up with Charlton TV looking exactly like the Sports Center spoof that Rob McElhenney and Ryan Reynolds did on their ‘Welcome to Wrexham’ series. Funny though.
At least Rob and Ryan got football people on board straight away, if a movie star has the humility to admit he doesn't know anything about running a club, it really shows the ego of Sandgaard
That's a wild conspiracy theory, to put it kindly. TS's long-term aim is to develop land he doesn't even own, by running down the asset that he does. Ha!
It is plausible unfortunately in this day an age whether by intended calculation (I don't think that's the case at all) or by circumstance ie floundering in league one or lower hemorrhaging millions each season.
Being a Charlton fan is brief respite during enduring periods of turbulence. The seat belt sign never turns off.
Really disagree that it's plausible.
To clarify I mean that it's quite plausible we could be sold and Valley lost or even lost without a sale rather than the specifics of the tweet.
Anyone hear that TS has had to borrow money this month to pay wage bill or some of it? Don't know how true this is.. 300K
That makes sense. I always thought the cost cutting was him getting ready to sell up. It could equally mean he doesn’t have the funds to sustain us
I’ve always thought it was down to funds. I don’t like what Sandgaard has been doing but it’s easy to spend other peoples money. It’s been obvious for a while he doesn’t have the money for league 1 losses, he expected promotion last year. Thats why he’s cost cutting and putting prices high expecting fans “to do their bit”.
It’s only going to get worse. His sales targets are impossible so only player sales can cover the losses. Unless we find a Lookman every year it’s going to be a couple of Burstows and further cutting down on new signings. Almost impossible to then succeed on the pitch.
I can only hope that was a random act, because if it were targetted at the owner it's pathetic and criminal behaviour. Whoever done it if a CAFC fan should go join the thugs at Millwall.
Comments
Just skimming them. The reviews are largely positive. A lot of the negative reviews come from sales people. There's some talk of fraud and lack of clarity in billing and reimbursement. That would make them...like literally every other for-profit entity in US Healthcare. Seriously, so much of US healthcare is profiting off of sickness, and it can't be stressed enough how awful some of the people involved are.
It's very possible that there is actual fraud, but it is also very possible that the subtleties and nuances of the incredibly opaque and oftentimes awful US healthcare insurance and reimbursement systems are not being fully explained to sales reps making $38k/year. Or both. Things are better here than they were 15 years ago, but there are still a lot of things (especially in some states with fewer patient protections) that make you go "wait, that's legal?" But it is. So long story short, it's really hard to say.
There seems to be some allusions to UnitedHealthcare suing Zynex. I can't find anything about that in a quick Google search, but United is removing Zynex from their approved list, which means a big loss in revenue.
https://nightmarketresearch.com/zyxi-undisclosed-loss/
Look, I hate to say "I told you so" about him, but when I heard "Medical device manufacturing and sales" I had a pretty good idea of who this guy was. Between that and the discrimination lawsuit, you get a good picture of who Sandgaard is. He got very rich through charm and labor exploitation from a byzantine system that trades on sickness and death. In my time in private sector Healthcare IT, I've run across this kind of dude (usually European and oftentimes English) a few times. He is always a cynical cunt at heart.
Could we do better? Yes. Do we deserve better? Yes. But could we do worse? Absolutely, and I think if TS ever were to go away, or even want to go away, we'd be far more likely to do worse than better. That's not to say "don't push for change," it's more to try to context set the situation we're in.
It's happening gif!
Being a Charlton fan is brief respite during enduring periods of turbulence. The seat belt sign never turns off.
Jim White and Simon Jordan could look up the fresh ongoing problem and get sandguard on the phone.
It won't help an awful lot, but it will at least expose his recent actions