Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)

1856857859861862867

Comments

  • That's some top level meme's from the official account.
  • Leuth said:
    The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Shall we wait and see him play maybe 
    Before his leg break he was very popular, joined a top French side.
  • I'd have preferred a PL loanee youngster for that position, if nothing else so that he didn't use up a squad place, as we've got too many players now
  • Leuth said:
    The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Shall we wait and see him play maybe 
    He should start saturday as he's been with us for weeks, so we won't have to wait long. 
  • edited September 2021
    Leuth said:
    The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Shall we wait and see him play maybe 
    He should start saturday as he's been with us for weeks, so we won't have to wait long. 
    I’m sure if he’s not starting, you’ll be here moaning by 14:01.
    Did you mean 15:01, or was it 14th Jan ... B)
  • Sponsored links:


  • Leuth said:
    The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Shall we wait and see him play maybe 
    He should start saturday as he's been with us for weeks, so we won't have to wait long. 
    I’m sure if he’s not starting, you’ll be here moaning by 14:01.
    Signing a player not fit to start, to cover an injured player would seem to be a bit of a puzzling decision no? 
  • Cafc43v3r said:


    😂😂😂
    That’s handy - signing a left back who can play left back.
  • Leuth said:
    The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Shall we wait and see him play maybe 
    He should start saturday as he's been with us for weeks, so we won't have to wait long. 
    I’m sure if he’s not starting, you’ll be here moaning by 14:01.
    Did you mean 15.01, or was it 14th Jan 2022... B)
    Haha team will be announced at 2pm though 
  • Leuth said:
    The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Shall we wait and see him play maybe 
    He should start saturday as he's been with us for weeks, so we won't have to wait long. 
    I’m sure if he’s not starting, you’ll be here moaning by 14:01.
    Signing a player not fit to start, to cover an injured player would seem to be a bit of a puzzling decision no? 
    If the recruitment team believe he’s the best available left back from all available free agents, I guess they’ll be okay with Gunter continuing for a while in that position, until Purrington or Souare are ready to start. Agreed it’s not perfect, but also not a disaster. 
  • Leuth said:
    The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Shall we wait and see him play maybe 
    He should start saturday as he's been with us for weeks, so we won't have to wait long. 
    I’m sure if he’s not starting, you’ll be here moaning by 14:01.
    Signing a player not fit to start, to cover an injured player would seem to be a bit of a puzzling decision no? 
    If you constantly live on planet short term, yes.
  • Leuth said:
    The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Shall we wait and see him play maybe 
    He should start saturday as he's been with us for weeks, so we won't have to wait long. 
    I’m sure if he’s not starting, you’ll be here moaning by 14:01.
    Did you mean 15.01, or was it 14th Jan 2022... B)
    Haha team will be announced at 2pm though 
    Touche.. B)....
  • Chunes said:
    Leuth said:
    The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Shall we wait and see him play maybe 
    He should start saturday as he's been with us for weeks, so we won't have to wait long. 
    I’m sure if he’s not starting, you’ll be here moaning by 14:01.
    Signing a player not fit to start, to cover an injured player would seem to be a bit of a puzzling decision no? 
    I really can't believe this is your response to signing a LB after the way you've been banging on in the Ged Roddy thread. 
    I can very well believe it.  Some of it is proper tin foil hat stuff. 
  • Purrington should be fit by Saturday as well. 
  • Chunes said:
    Leuth said:
    The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Shall we wait and see him play maybe 
    He should start saturday as he's been with us for weeks, so we won't have to wait long. 
    I’m sure if he’s not starting, you’ll be here moaning by 14:01.
    Signing a player not fit to start, to cover an injured player would seem to be a bit of a puzzling decision no? 
    I really can't believe this is your response to signing a LB after the way you've been banging on in the Ged Roddy thread. 
    And I can't believe you can't believe the response he posted.
  • Sponsored links:


  • PWADDICK said:

    Well that puts the Roddy conspiracy to bed.  Welcome Souare.
    There was never any just idiots trying to make something out of nothing 
  • The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Tell us who was better &available for no fee?
  • Chunes said:
    Leuth said:
    The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Shall we wait and see him play maybe 
    He should start saturday as he's been with us for weeks, so we won't have to wait long. 
    I’m sure if he’s not starting, you’ll be here moaning by 14:01.
    Signing a player not fit to start, to cover an injured player would seem to be a bit of a puzzling decision no? 
    I really can't believe this is your response to signing a LB after the way you've been banging on in the Ged Roddy thread. 
    One of life's complainers.
    Unhappy about most things.
  • The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Tell us who was better &available for no fee?
    In fairness I'm surprised we didn't go in for one on loan. If U21, they wouldn't have counted towards the squad cap plus we've only got 4 loanees so no issues with matchday squads. Wouldn't have been my first choice with injury record but clearly got some talent and has been training with us. Minor question marks over keeper and striker but this was the one position I think we should really have got during the window so very pleased to see the deal done. 
  • I'd have preferred a PL loanee youngster for that position, if nothing else so that he didn't use up a squad place, as we've got too many players now
    2 will have to miss out, surely Dempsey and JFC but wouldnt be surprised if one is Schwartz either. 
  • PWADDICK said:

    Well that puts the Roddy conspiracy to bed.  Welcome Souare.
    There was never any just idiots trying to make something out of nothing 
    Thanks Ged.
  • The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Tell us who was better &available for no fee?
    In fairness I'm surprised we didn't go in for one on loan. If U21, they wouldn't have counted towards the squad cap plus we've only got 4 loanees so no issues with matchday squads. Wouldn't have been my first choice with injury record but clearly got some talent and has been training with us. Minor question marks over keeper and striker but this was the one position I think we should really have got during the window so very pleased to see the deal done. 
    I'd be staggered if within Chelsea, Spurs, Arsenal etc there wasn't an U21 we could have signed in July/August before the season started on loan. After all we didn't do badly with DaSilva or Maatsen.
  • The idea that there was no one better available during the summer window I find very difficult to believe. 
    Tell us who was better &available for no fee?
    In fairness I'm surprised we didn't go in for one on loan. If U21, they wouldn't have counted towards the squad cap plus we've only got 4 loanees so no issues with matchday squads. Wouldn't have been my first choice with injury record but clearly got some talent and has been training with us. Minor question marks over keeper and striker but this was the one position I think we should really have got during the window so very pleased to see the deal done. 
    Think under 21 loanees do count towards the squad cap but I could be wrong. 
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!