Inniss can barely complete one set of 90 minutes, let alone 46 of them across several months. I would honestly expect Lavelle to come in and be first choice. Inniss can't last but would be a hell of a set piece weapon off the bench.
i would rather the better player be first choice, personally.
Inniss is already a cult hero and is a good player but due to his fitness, is a liability. You can't build a promotion winning team around players like that unfortunately.
Besides all of that, have you seen Lavelle play to know that Inniss is better?
I can still see an LB being signed on loan. Perhaps we are waiting for other perms to be done before we know what wage budget is left and can be offered as a % to parent clubs.
LB/CB and ST, potentially all 3. Ronnie has a Calf injury, but he is not part of NA plans is what i've heard
Inniss can barely complete one set of 90 minutes, let alone 46 of them across several months. I would honestly expect Lavelle to come in and be first choice. Inniss can't last but would be a hell of a set piece weapon off the bench.
i would rather the better player be first choice, personally.
Inniss is already a cult hero and is a good player but due to his fitness, is a liability. You can't build a promotion winning team around players like that unfortunately.
Besides all of that, have you seen Lavelle play to know that Inniss is better?
No that's why I didn't say which should start.
If Inniss is better he should be first choice, if Lavelle is then he should be.
Davison scores in the Pizza Trophy. No striker needed now.
Tbf I think he'll be a decent option to have, but I still think we need another striker, especially if Schwartz isn't around. The issue is we play a very specific way with Stockley so really we need a backup to him, but I'd actually like us to sign a striker with a lot of pace to stretch teams instead
Davison should be third choice and nothing more. Would much rather he was out on loan.
He's 4th choice
Stockley
Washington
Lee
Davison
Lee is not an out and out striker - attacking midfielder more like.
We need another before 11pm IMO
Do you wanna bet. Brilliant goal tonight.
Yeah I do - he is a very good attacking midfielder which is what we need in our team. I dont want to lose that. I wouldn't sub him in for Stockley - I would rather he plays just behind him making late runs into the box.
No talk of a left back. Doesn't look like we're going to get one, which I find odd.
Signing another centre back instead of a left back doesn't make any sense to me
It does in some ways, I think. Makeshift left backs are not good but makeshift centre halves are points lost. If Inniss is not 100% really, it makes sense.
No talk of a left back. Doesn't look like we're going to get one, which I find odd.
Signing another centre back instead of a left back doesn't make any sense to me
It does in some ways, I think. Makeshift left backs are not good but makeshift centre halves are points lost. If Inniss is not 100% really, it makes sense.
Comments
Besides all of that, have you seen Lavelle play to know that Inniss is better?
If Inniss is better he should be first choice, if Lavelle is then he should be.
Morecambe defender moves a step closer to Charlton Athletic switch
https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/morecambe-defender-moves-a-step-closer-to-charlton-athletic-switch/From what Cawley said it sounds like we're working on others too.
Stockley | Davison | Vennings are their Clients
They also have two Crawley players
Smacks of ESI..
Thank God the referees parents named him Neil instead of Seymour.