What happened to the Charlton protests going to Stage 2 / 3 to ensure the ex crooks don't get anywhere near another football club. Were the pursued or closed down due to lack of EFL cooperation.
What happened to the Charlton protests going to Stage 2 / 3 to ensure the ex crooks don't get anywhere near another football club. Were the pursued or closed down due to lack of EFL cooperation.
Stage 3 was against the EFL I believe, I doubt it was ever perceived that this bunch would turn up at a EPL club
Who writes this shit? They talk as though Farnell owns the club already. Sounds similar to the BS he spouted when involved at Charlton and yet again crap journalists lap it up.
I’ve posted thrice on a Burnley forum and tried to contact Alastair Campbell. It’s all I’m prepared to do.
The info is out there if they want to see it.
A Burnley mate has asked me to links to info about the dangers I've just warned him of. Other than this thread, what can I give him to pass on? Farnell didn't have his own dossier thread, right?
I’ve posted thrice on a Burnley forum and tried to contact Alastair Campbell. It’s all I’m prepared to do.
The info is out there if they want to see it.
A Burnley mate has asked me to links to info about the dangers I've just warned him of. Other than this thread, what can I give him to pass on? Farnell didn't have his own dossier thread, right?
I don't remember him having his own thread, although there was one called something like ESI research. Probably mostly on the Bonkers Shenanigans thread - but anything of that sort would be members only.
Weegie posted that CAST are in contact with their opposite numbers in Burnley, so I expect they are feeding them info.
This is an article about Wigan, but seemingly applicable to wherever he goes https://london-post.co.uk/wigan-athletic-takeover-in-chaos-as-former-charlton-athletic-director-looks-to-gain-control/ I particularly like the last paragraph which seems to sum things up nicely: "Helpless football fans will eagerly await to see if Farnell’s attempt to get his hands on the club will be successful as it could bring a whole host of unwanted unscrupulous vultures due to the failing FPP protecting our football institutes ."
I wonder if farnell has Elliot lined up to pay the wages again
I wonder if this has anything to do with the court case, trying to give the impression they were serious about owning a football club.
Might be way off, but I assume this brings Elliott's involvement in football to an end. Seems strange otherwise that Farnell would have had his appeal heard, yet nothing has been mentioned about Elliott's. Surely he'd have had his appeal heard too by now if he was still involved.
No reason for EFL to announce anything about Elliott at present, so (obviously) they won't. EFL will be forced to make an announcement if, say, Elliott turned up leach-like as a director at Burnley, should Farnell & El Kashashy be successful.
Well this is everything the Groovy Gang ever dreamed of if this comes off. Leaking to journos that they've been interested in Burnley for a year and Staunch Partners was incorporated for that purpose. Yet go back just a few months and Farnell was pulling the strings of his sham sale process at Charlton with El Kashashy skulking around in the shadows allegedly putting cash up and even attending the remote court hearings on at least one occasion. Now he apparently has access to £200m to spend on an acquisition of another club. Madness.
No reason for EFL to announce anything about Elliott at present, so (obviously) they won't. EFL will be forced to make an announcement if, say, Elliott turned up leach-like as a director at Burnley, should Farnell & El Kashashy be successful.
The EFL won't announce anything no, like they haven't with Farnell either
A couple of points stand out: the EFL may have cleared Farnell but the EPL may have stricter criteria. And if this has been ongoing for a year, how were they involved at Charlton? Conflict of interest, which I'm sure won't be ignored. I hope they take one look at the clubs Farnell has previously been involved in and take this into consideration as well.
A deal is in
process to buy Burnley, led by Mohamed Sayed Zein Elkashashy, an
entrepreneur, and Chris Farnell, a Cheshire sports lawyer who had been
banned from owning a football club until the EFL lifted the restriction
today.
Farnell
and Elkashashy are the main players in a group of investors that would
pay about £200 million for the Lancashire club, who are 18th in the
Premier League.
A
source close to the pair claims they are closing in on a deal after 12
months of negotiations, having provided proof of funding and concluded a
sale-and-purchase agreement with Mike Garlick, Burnley’s chairman, who
owns 49.24 per cent of the club’s shares.
Garlick and Burnley’s other leading shareholder, John Banaszkiewicz, who has a 28.2 per cent stake, had been in talks with ALK Capital LLC, an American investment group, but discussions have stalled.
A
takeover will have ramifications for the Burnley manager, Sean Dyche.
Relations have long been strained between Garlick and Dyche over their different views on how to grow the club but it is understood Elkashashy and Farnell are keen to back Dyche and plan to provide him with funds to strengthen his squad.Elkashashy,
42, is an Egyptian food and leisure magnate while Farnell, 50, is a
senior partner at IPS Law, based in Hale, which has advised the Belgium
manager Roberto Martínez and players such as Cristiano Ronaldo and David
Silva. He was also the lead lawyer for Swansea City when they were
taken over by Steve Kaplan and Jason Levien in 2016.In
November last year Elkashashy and Farnell set up a private investment
company, Staunch Partners Limited, which shares an address with IPS Law
and is thought to be the proposed takeover vehicle for Burnley.Farnell
was cleared to pursue his bid for Burnley by an independent arbitration
panel, which ruled today that an EFL ban on him owning a football club
should be limited to five weeks, backdated to September 14.The
ban was imposed after he was involved in a chaotic attempt to buy
Charlton Athletic with Paul Elliott, a Manchester-based businessmen,
from Tahnoon Nimer, who owned the club before selling it to Thomas
Sandgaard, a Danish-American entrepreneur.Elliott
and Farnell were unable to pass the EFL’s owners’ and directors’ Test
in August. Farnell blamed an innocent error: he neglected to tick a box
confirming he was briefly director of the company trying to buy
Charlton. The tribunal agreed that he had not deliberately sought to
mislead the EFL.Farnell
was also a director at Wigan Athletic in 2013. He advised the former
Leeds United owner Massimo Cellino and was hired by Bury’s board in a
bid to keep the defunct club alive before its expulsion from the EFL
last year.The
attraction of Burnley for Elkashashy and Farnell is the club’s
stability and recent history of being run on a sound financial footing,
and the leadership provided by Dyche, who has achieved Europa League
football and given Burnley five consecutive seasons in England’s top
flight.Dyche
will hope that any new owners provide him with funds to reinforce his
squad. Burnley’s struggles this season — Monday’s home defeat by
Tottenham Hotspur left them with one point from their first five games —
suggest his desire is well-founded.4 Premier League clubs under English majority ownership if Burnley are sold (Brighton, Newcastle, Tottenham, West Ham)
Maybe another conflict of interst for the SRA to consider, if CF has been interested in buying Burnley with El Kashashy at the same time as wanting to buy us with PE (and El Cash as part of the consortium according to PE comments to the Trust back in July).
Banging my head against the wall reading some of the Burnley fans comments. “He’s just a lawyer”, “those clubs were in trouble before he arrived” etc
How frustrating.
F**k them. They’ve been warned and think they know best. They will be the first to moan in 12 months when they’ve just lost 2-0 away at qpr to put them in the championship relegation zone, with Bonne scoring both
Interesting one this, as allegedly to purchase the club is £200m, so not really sure what their game/plan is here.
Buy the club, use it to fund a nice lifestyle, leech money out where they can (whatever they can get away with), flip it and sell it a few years down the line for a lot more money, because premier league club prices keep rising. My guess.
Can't believe for a second that they've got 200m to buy a club and then god knows however much else to actually run it.
Even if it's possible they could've got some investors on board, who the hell wants to invest in a relegation threatened premier league club with fans shut out, where there is probably little to no chance of making any money. It's not like Mansour or Abramovich where they don't care about losing money, they'd surely only be interested to make money. But the entire reason Garlick wants to sell is because Burnley are struggling and have been one of the worst financially affected clubs during Covid. That won't change just because a new investor comes in.
I can't see this as anything other than them getting their name out there before moving onto a much cheaper lower profile club.
Interesting one this, as allegedly to purchase the club is £200m, so not really sure what their game/plan is here.
Buy the club, use it to fund a nice lifestyle, leech money out where they can (whatever they can get away with), flip it and sell it a few years down the line for a lot more money, because premier league club prices keep rising. My guess.
That was my initial thought, but that relies on remaining in the PL which is far from certain, they have an ageing squad that will need a lot of work in the next 18 months.
Risky, the £200min could quickly become £30/40m if they are relegated and fail to get back up. Very different prospect to paying £1.....
Interesting one this, as allegedly to purchase the club is £200m, so not really sure what their game/plan is here.
Buy the club, use it to fund a nice lifestyle, leech money out where they can (whatever they can get away with), flip it and sell it a few years down the line for a lot more money, because premier league club prices keep rising. My guess.
That works if you're the Glazers at Man U, but not at Burnley.
For a start they're not guaranteed to stay in the league for a few years (possibly not even beyond next summer given their start to this season). Yes they could pocket the tv money and spend little on the team, but they've missed the boat for that this season, plus obviously in doing so they'll be in the championship pretty rapidly.
Then suddenly the 200m investment isn't even worth a third of that. Burnley in the championship would be worth what? Northern club, no international appeal, smallish fan base, not many top players to sell. I'd say around 50-60m tops, and that'd only be because of the guaranteed parachute money for 2-3 years.
Who writes this shit? They talk as though Farnell owns the club already. Sounds similar to the BS he spouted when involved at Charlton and yet again crap journalists lap it up.
"there will be no huge changes at the club" Till Dave Jones shows up in his Range Rover as Director of football.
I think some are confusing the two current parties and the (mis)information coming out about the Burnley takeover.
You cannot blame some of the Burnley fans from knocking our experiences with Farnell & Co. Plenty of Charlton fans saw him in a positive light initially as he was anti Southall. The more serious posters on their board are taking the information to heart and are now doing their own research, particularly on the sudden implausible wealth of El Kashashy. For instance...
After a bit of reading here, now see that we have a questionable lawyer who seems to have a fetish for being front and centre of leading a takeover of a football club. What is his obsession ? commission / fame ? How many lawyer's do you know who front takeovers. As a recent example, recalling reading about the good news of EG bringing Asda back into British ownership, nothing at all about lawyers in the hundreds of news stories.
Back to Mohamed El Kashashy, in stark contrast to Farnell, nothing in news for 6 years. Looking at the Food Group franchises, of the three brands mentioned (Eric Kayser, Avec and Little More Cafe) all but one branch of Eric Kayser still exist in Dubai. something happened to the portfolio of Food Group in Dubai in the last 6 years. I suspect as Kayser is still relatively successful it is operated by someone other than Think Food LLC.
This suggests that Mohamed El Kashashy no longer owns Think Food or it is just a shell company. This in turn implies that he aint had a proper (or legit) job for some time. All of which suggests he absolutely has very little money or is yet another front for someone else. When you are using a questionable solicitor, introducing a bloke with less money than me, on behalf of a shadow, we need to be a little bit concerned.
Comments
The Premier League could block this. They won't want a repeat of Portsmouth
Probably mostly on the Bonkers Shenanigans thread - but anything of that sort would be members only.
Weegie posted that CAST are in contact with their opposite numbers in Burnley, so I expect they are feeding them info.
This is an article about Wigan, but seemingly applicable to wherever he goes https://london-post.co.uk/wigan-athletic-takeover-in-chaos-as-former-charlton-athletic-director-looks-to-gain-control/ I particularly like the last paragraph which seems to sum things up nicely:
"Helpless football fans will eagerly await to see if Farnell’s attempt to get his hands on the club will be successful as it could bring a whole host of unwanted unscrupulous vultures due to the failing FPP protecting our football institutes ."
EFL will be forced to make an announcement if, say, Elliott turned up leach-like as a director at Burnley, should Farnell & El Kashashy be successful.
A deal is in process to buy Burnley, led by Mohamed Sayed Zein Elkashashy, an entrepreneur, and Chris Farnell, a Cheshire sports lawyer who had been banned from owning a football club until the EFL lifted the restriction today.
Farnell and Elkashashy are the main players in a group of investors that would pay about £200 million for the Lancashire club, who are 18th in the Premier League.
A source close to the pair claims they are closing in on a deal after 12 months of negotiations, having provided proof of funding and concluded a sale-and-purchase agreement with Mike Garlick, Burnley’s chairman, who owns 49.24 per cent of the club’s shares.
Garlick and Burnley’s other leading shareholder, John Banaszkiewicz, who has a 28.2 per cent stake, had been in talks with ALK Capital LLC, an American investment group, but discussions have stalled.
A takeover will have ramifications for the Burnley manager, Sean Dyche. Relations have long been strained between Garlick and Dyche over their different views on how to grow the club but it is understood Elkashashy and Farnell are keen to back Dyche and plan to provide him with funds to strengthen his squad.Elkashashy, 42, is an Egyptian food and leisure magnate while Farnell, 50, is a senior partner at IPS Law, based in Hale, which has advised the Belgium manager Roberto Martínez and players such as Cristiano Ronaldo and David Silva. He was also the lead lawyer for Swansea City when they were taken over by Steve Kaplan and Jason Levien in 2016.In November last year Elkashashy and Farnell set up a private investment company, Staunch Partners Limited, which shares an address with IPS Law and is thought to be the proposed takeover vehicle for Burnley.Farnell was cleared to pursue his bid for Burnley by an independent arbitration panel, which ruled today that an EFL ban on him owning a football club should be limited to five weeks, backdated to September 14.The ban was imposed after he was involved in a chaotic attempt to buy Charlton Athletic with Paul Elliott, a Manchester-based businessmen, from Tahnoon Nimer, who owned the club before selling it to Thomas Sandgaard, a Danish-American entrepreneur.Elliott and Farnell were unable to pass the EFL’s owners’ and directors’ Test in August. Farnell blamed an innocent error: he neglected to tick a box confirming he was briefly director of the company trying to buy Charlton. The tribunal agreed that he had not deliberately sought to mislead the EFL.Farnell was also a director at Wigan Athletic in 2013. He advised the former Leeds United owner Massimo Cellino and was hired by Bury’s board in a bid to keep the defunct club alive before its expulsion from the EFL last year.The attraction of Burnley for Elkashashy and Farnell is the club’s stability and recent history of being run on a sound financial footing, and the leadership provided by Dyche, who has achieved Europa League football and given Burnley five consecutive seasons in England’s top flight.Dyche will hope that any new owners provide him with funds to reinforce his squad. Burnley’s struggles this season — Monday’s home defeat by Tottenham Hotspur left them with one point from their first five games — suggest his desire is well-founded.4 Premier League clubs under English majority ownership if Burnley are sold (Brighton, Newcastle, Tottenham, West Ham)How frustrating.
Even if it's possible they could've got some investors on board, who the hell wants to invest in a relegation threatened premier league club with fans shut out, where there is probably little to no chance of making any money. It's not like Mansour or Abramovich where they don't care about losing money, they'd surely only be interested to make money. But the entire reason Garlick wants to sell is because Burnley are struggling and have been one of the worst financially affected clubs during Covid. That won't change just because a new investor comes in.
I can't see this as anything other than them getting their name out there before moving onto a much cheaper lower profile club.
Risky, the £200min could quickly become £30/40m if they are relegated and fail to get back up. Very different prospect to paying £1.....
For a start they're not guaranteed to stay in the league for a few years (possibly not even beyond next summer given their start to this season). Yes they could pocket the tv money and spend little on the team, but they've missed the boat for that this season, plus obviously in doing so they'll be in the championship pretty rapidly.
Then suddenly the 200m investment isn't even worth a third of that. Burnley in the championship would be worth what? Northern club, no international appeal, smallish fan base, not many top players to sell. I'd say around 50-60m tops, and that'd only be because of the guaranteed parachute money for 2-3 years.
You cannot blame some of the Burnley fans from knocking our experiences with Farnell & Co. Plenty of Charlton fans saw him in a positive light initially as he was anti Southall. The more serious posters on their board are taking the information to heart and are now doing their own research, particularly on the sudden implausible wealth of El Kashashy. For instance...
After a bit of reading here, now see that we have a questionable lawyer who seems to have a fetish for being front and centre of leading a takeover of a football club. What is his obsession ? commission / fame ? How many lawyer's do you know who front takeovers. As a recent example, recalling reading about the good news of EG bringing Asda back into British ownership, nothing at all about lawyers in the hundreds of news stories.
Back to Mohamed El Kashashy, in stark contrast to Farnell, nothing in news for 6 years. Looking at the Food Group franchises, of the three brands mentioned (Eric Kayser, Avec and Little More Cafe) all but one branch of Eric Kayser still exist in Dubai. something happened to the portfolio of Food Group in Dubai in the last 6 years. I suspect as Kayser is still relatively successful it is operated by someone other than Think Food LLC.
This suggests that Mohamed El Kashashy no longer owns Think Food or it is just a shell company. This in turn implies that he aint had a proper (or legit) job for some time. All of which suggests he absolutely has very little money or is yet another front for someone else. When you are using a questionable solicitor, introducing a bloke with less money than me, on behalf of a shadow, we need to be a little bit concerned.