That's excellent news. A happy end to the story but it could have been so different if you guys hadn't taken the action you did. Very well done.
Was there an actual danger that the stuff could have been, shall we say, redistributed?
Looking at what Elliot(t) done at that girls school we thought the best action was to remove our most valuable items. Remember, most items are not ours, we are just the trustee's
That's excellent news. A happy end to the story but it could have been so different if you guys hadn't taken the action you did. Very well done.
Was there an actual danger that the stuff could have been, shall we say, redistributed?
Looking at what Elliot(t) done at that girls school we thought the best action was to remove our most valuable items. Remember, most items are not ours, we are just the trustee's
Oh I agree totally but just wondered if there was a real threat of it going missing.
That's excellent news. A happy end to the story but it could have been so different if you guys hadn't taken the action you did. Very well done.
Was there an actual danger that the stuff could have been, shall we say, redistributed?
The museum guys are best placed to answer this Large, but my understanding is there was genuine concern that the crooks and chancers might have sought to cash in. Hence the temporary relocation to a safe place.
That's excellent news. A happy end to the story but it could have been so different if you guys hadn't taken the action you did. Very well done.
Was there an actual danger that the stuff could have been, shall we say, redistributed?
Looking at what Elliot(t) done at that girls school we thought the best action was to remove our most valuable items. Remember, most items are not ours, we are just the trustee's
Oh I agree totally but just wondered if there was a real threat of it going missing.
We all thought it was better to be safe than sorry.
Personally, I was more fearful that if we had gone into administration we would have had to prove all the items belonged to the charity, or are on loan from generous fans, not to the club.
Personally, I was more fearful that if we had gone into administration we would have had to prove all the items belonged to the charity, or are on loan from generous fans, not to the club.
Yes, the latter was an genuine issue, it could have been a massive hassle trying to explain to the administrator who owned what
Personally, I don't think PE would have tried to flog items in the museum, as they're far too high profile, and I think PE was only interested in making a profit on reselling the club anyway
Wouldn’t put anything past Elliott, especially since yesterday when I read the post about him flogging second hand kitchen units at 100 quid a pop in 2014.
Comments
Absolutely extraordinary!
Ladies and gentlemen. I present to you
E.S.I (subject to court approval)
It was a small risk perhaps but still a risk.
It was not a decision we took lightly.
Personally, I was more fearful that if we had gone into administration we would have had to prove all the items belonged to the charity, or are on loan from generous fans, not to the club.
Is there any room for a black, heavily-used Duessenberg Starplayer? I think the museum would make a nice home for Charlton's most famous guitar.
Personally, I don't think PE would have tried to flog items in the museum, as they're far too high profile, and I think PE was only interested in making a profit on reselling the club anyway
Don't forget scumbag elliottttttt sold everything from the school, even items donated by parents.
Just how low can you go elliotttt ???
Edit: Sorry I was too late posting as somebody has already mentioned it .......................... still it does no harm to leave it up here.