Paul Elliott Associated Ownership at St Elphins - "Broke the Law" + unauthorised land development

DMC

See these twitter threads from someone's twitter account for Paul Elliott's history in his involvement of the asset stripped girls school of St Elphins whose land has been redeveloped and sold since.
Initially, ownership involving Paul Elliott and others had apparently been under the guise of saving the school however 9 months later it was abruptly shut down without warning during student exams. The ownership had "illegally dismissed" school staff as found by a subsequent employment tribunal due to this lack of notice.

1st Thread (twitter link: https://twitter.com/DomCafc/status/1289566497308901378) reads:
Paul Elliott ownership “BROKE THE LAW” as found by an St Elphins employment tribunal Tax payers picked up the tribunal compensation cost School shut without warning during key exams which threatened to “make boarding students homeless” of all ages.
Article referenced: http://www.stelphins.co.uk/press56.html?LMCL=cSinu8&LMCL=k_bsh5&LMCL=XVCHfK 

2nd Thread: (Twitter link https://twitter.com/DomCafc/status/1289503723861893125)
Additionally an email was sent from someone to this twitter account recording a personal account of what happened whist the person had been working there as a teacher. This is a truly damning account that appears consistent with all media reports although more detailed from the perspective of someone on the ground at the time.

3rd Thread: (twitter link https://twitter.com/DomCafc/status/1289844405025697792): 
Paul Elliott ownership apparent disregard of law at St Elphins: - Construction works began without planning permission + an unauthorised felling of a protected tree - Likely that house construction was the plan from the off at St Elphins
Article Referenced: http://stelphins.co.uk/press22.html

Possible Conclusion:
What would appear apparently clear from all of these reports is that the current Charlton ownership has enormous parallels with what occurred at St Elphin's. The "owners" reportedly appear to have no regard for legal protections surrounding land development and are reportedly utterly ruthless in their pursuit of whatever it is they desire. How fans can act to halt this is of course the big question at Charlton.

Disclaimer: this is just a summary report of what is written by others and an attempt to relay what is written from these accounts for others to see. Voice of the Valley publicly first made the connection between Paul Elliott and St Elphins.
Please comment below and share with others, ensuring people know this is vital.

Lincsaddick

one day we might get a potential buyer who is not as dodgy as a £9 note

MuttleyCAFC

The thing with Elliot is that we suspect he is not paying the wages out of his own pocket. So whilst he clearly is not the nice man we are being told, more importantly, don't we need to know who is paying the wages and focus on them. 

seth plum

Whatever can be squeezed from the latent resources of Charlton Athletic is paying the wages for now.

mendonca

A picture can be rather telling. Photos of Southall, Nimer and Elliot all show a person who looks the opposite of being settled, rich, confident, assured.

Blucher

seth plum said:

Whatever can be squeezed from the latent resources of Charlton Athletic is paying the wages for now.

I expect the rate of interest will be absolutely eye-watering 

DMC

MuttleyCAFC said:

The thing with Elliot is that we suspect he is not paying the wages out of his own pocket. So whilst he clearly is not the nice man we are being told, more importantly, don't we need to know who is paying the wages and focus on them. 

Yes - possibly Mohammed El Khashasy but none the less this sort of history gives an idea of future intentions

The Prince-e-Paul

The thing is, Elliott doesn't own any of the land assets attached to Charlton. If he is in for the land deal, long-term, surely Roland must be behind the plans.

redman

Is somebody bringing this to EFL attention? Seeme relevant info for fit and proper persons test. I would be happy to do this but don't want to cut across what other people are doing? 

ElfsborgAddick

The Prince-e-Paul said:

The thing is, Elliott doesn't own any of the land assets attached to Charlton. If he is in for the land deal, long-term, surely Roland must be behind the plans.

Probably explaining why he is not getting involved in this mess.

SoundAsa£

ElfsborgAddick said:

The Prince-e-Paul said:

The thing is, Elliott doesn't own any of the land assets attached to Charlton. If he is in for the land deal, long-term, surely Roland must be behind the plans.

Probably explaining why he is not getting involved in this mess.

Wouldn’t surprise me to be honest.😩

Raith_C_Chattonell

The Prince-e-Paul said:

The thing is, Elliott doesn't own any of the land assets attached to Charlton. If he is in for the land deal, long-term, surely Roland must be behind the plans.

Only one way to find out, set Jim White on him at a top Belgian restaurant over a splendid lobster thermidor accompanied by several fine bottles of Chardonnay (partially oaked dry from California).  Maybe a simple dessert of Lemon blackberry souffle and to finish three or four Rémy Martins.

Jim can then report back how the cruel Charlton fans have treated this visionary mate of his and how little difference a few more high rise blocks in SE London will make.