Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket Team Summer 2019 -ICC World Cup and Ashes etc

1…4849515354…179

Comments

  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,381
    cnut bowled by Broad
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,884
    If only we had Leach right now...............
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,053
    England have 10 mins to bat.
    I'll be dead chuffed if we don't lose a wicket.
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 36,090
    At fucking last.

    What an innings.
  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,726
    Would’ve taken 284 all out at the start of the day having lost the toss, but hard not too feel a bit flat after losing Anderson and them putting 150 on for the last 2 wickets 
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,237
    I think we only got Smith out because he wants a couple of overs at England.
    Jimmy Anderson to open with Woakes !
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,381
    Broad deserves a lot of credit for keeping going .. Ali, Stokes ? .. nowhere near at it
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,381
    Here come the Surrey heroes .. good luck chaps .. you'll need it
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,053
    Burns & Roy batting.
    6 mins to negotiate.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,053
    You just know what's likely.....

  • Sponsored links:



  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,884
    Why did we send out a nightwatchman against Ireland but don't do it now against the Aussies? Not a fan of them myself but there is a bit of inconsistency given that there are no more than 2 overs tonight.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,671
    How many wickets will we lose?
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,884
    LenGlover said:
    How many wickets will we lose?
    10. Eventually.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,053
    Roy wafts cross batted & misses.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,053
    3-0  1 over.
    1 over to go.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,671
    Addick Addict said:
    Why did we send out a nightwatchman against Ireland but don't do it now against the Aussies? Not a fan of them myself but there is a bit of inconsistency given that there are no more than 2 overs tonight.
    Roy's debut last time?

    Now he's a big boy.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,053
    10-0 close of play.
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,381
    decent start .. long way to go
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,389
    Pitch looks like a road now, at least! And we bat down to 9...
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,717
    Surrey openers save the day.

  • Sponsored links:



  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,237
    Well played Surrey boys.
    Just the one 20/20 shot from Roy. 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,717
    soapboxsam said:
    Well played Surrey boys.
    Just the one 20/20 shot from Roy. 
    Went for 4
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,829
    edited August 2019
    Well done the openers on doing their job, making sure our premier batsman from Kent didn’t have to make an appearance until tomorrow.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,348
    edited August 2019
    Addick Addict said:
    Why did we send out a nightwatchman against Ireland but don't do it now against the Aussies? Not a fan of them myself but there is a bit of inconsistency given that there are no more than 2 overs tonight.
    A nightwatchman was needed against Ireland and did his job spectacularly well to help set up a win. 

    A nightwatchman wasn't needed today so the openers will start again tomorrow and set up a win.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,053
    I think we need 400 or close to it, if we're going to win this.
    Unless all their batsman fail to score 50 in the 2nd innings, including Smith
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    The_President said:
    Addick Addict said:
    Basically whatever these umpire give, you just know the correct decision is the opposite. Siddle absolutely middled that!
    Just makes it incredulous that India refused to use DRS for many years saying it wasn't good enough !
    It was nothing to do with that, it was Sachin would have been out lbw 100 times. As soon as he went it came in. Swann was probably had the biggest benefit from DRS, Sachin would have had the opposite. 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,389
    Sachin would have been spared Steve Bucknor tbf
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Why was Woakes padded up as night watchman? 

    No Anderson obviously so shouldn't Broad be next in line? 

    Oh he doesn't like quick bowling cos he got hit once. 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,717
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Why was Woakes padded up as night watchman? 

    No Anderson obviously so shouldn't Broad be next in line? 

    Oh he doesn't like quick bowling cos he got hit once. 
    Broad ain't good enough for a nightwatchman. 
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    blackpool72 said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Why was Woakes padded up as night watchman? 

    No Anderson obviously so shouldn't Broad be next in line? 

    Oh he doesn't like quick bowling cos he got hit once. 
    Broad ain't good enough for a nightwatchman. 
    Would have said the same about Leach just over a week ago...

Categories

“Marketplace”