Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Players Marks: Burton Albion v Charlton Athletic
Comments
-
Some actually watched the game with their eyes. Steer, Bauer and Sarr all 5?nth london addick said:Some are easily pleased
1 -
Anyone scoring Sarr less than 7 must have been having a piss when he made that tackle. Or taking the piss.2
-
Yep not one of them was worth more they were ok but the whole team were poor don’t let the result blurr the factsLeuth said:
Some actually watched the game with their eyes. Steer, Bauer and Sarr all 5?nth london addick said:Some are easily pleased
We could’ve and should’ve lost that game no one would’ve blinked had the 2-1 been reversed
Virtually Every person agrees it was a smash and grab
If we had players that truly were 7-8 out of ten then the result can not have been a smash and grab but a deserved well earned win
But it wasn’t it was a poor performance by all bar Pearce all night , Lapsie tries hard covers every blade but he doesn’t need too
1 -
harveys_gardener said:
Anyone scoring Sarr less than 7 must have been having a piss when he made that tackle. Or taking the piss.
So one tackle masks the other poor decision or miss placed pass or poor header
0 -
Perhaps not but I haven't heard much about any of those you mention, just him preventing crosses. Playing out of position and not a regular. The best tackle I've seen in years, miss and he walks while they line up the penalty.nth london addick said:harveys_gardener said:Anyone scoring Sarr less than 7 must have been having a piss when he made that tackle. Or taking the piss.
So one tackle masks the other poor decision or miss placed pass or poor header1 -
With a near-absent midfield we only conceded one goal, a penalty. Doesn't that tell you that the defence and keeper played quite well?nth london addick said:
Yep not one of them was worth more they were ok but the whole team were poor don’t let the result blurr the factsLeuth said:
Some actually watched the game with their eyes. Steer, Bauer and Sarr all 5?nth london addick said:Some are easily pleased
We could’ve and should’ve lost that game no one would’ve blinked had the 2-1 been reversed
Virtually Every person agrees it was a smash and grab
If we had players that truly were 7-8 out of ten then the result can not have been a smash and grab but a deserved well earned win
But it wasn’t it was a poor performance by all bar Pearce all night , Lapsie tries hard covers every blade but he doesn’t need too1 -
Referee:
Steer: 8
Solly: 6
Bauer: 7
Pearce: 8
Sarr: 7
Lapslie: 6
Bielik: 5
Aribo: 6
Fosu: 5
Taylor: 6
Grant: 6
1 -
No because if Burton hadn’t been as shite in front of goal they would have been out of siteLeuth said:
With a near-absent midfield we only conceded one goal, a penalty. Doesn't that tell you that the defence and keeper played quite well?nth london addick said:
Yep not one of them was worth more they were ok but the whole team were poor don’t let the result blurr the factsLeuth said:
Some actually watched the game with their eyes. Steer, Bauer and Sarr all 5?nth london addick said:Some are easily pleased
We could’ve and should’ve lost that game no one would’ve blinked had the 2-1 been reversed
Virtually Every person agrees it was a smash and grab
If we had players that truly were 7-8 out of ten then the result can not have been a smash and grab but a deserved well earned win
But it wasn’t it was a poor performance by all bar Pearce all night , Lapsie tries hard covers every blade but he doesn’t need too
It’s a mark out of 10 if you give 7-8 then you are saying the player was above avg which Pearce and Lapsie were they were above the performance of the rest of the team who were at best only at 50%
We never once came out of 3rd gear as a team.
5 out of 10 is not a poor mark if I was giving the 3 or 4 then it’s a harsher critique of the player
0 -
Can I give marks having not watched but read the match thread, albeit an incomplete match thread because the server was down for part of the game?0