I thought he got a £110M bonus. At £47M he must be feeling the squeeze.
Think he agreed to give up half his shares.
I'm usually all for people at the top having skin in the game so to speak, but frankly that level is absurd.
Would love to see his package and reasons, although share price hasn't moved upwards since 12 months ago, I suspect this was set at year end when shares had increase from around £17 to £27 so I wonder if his incentive was based on share price movement which would make sense.
I thought he got a £110M bonus. At £47M he must be feeling the squeeze.
Think he agreed to give up half his shares.
I'm usually all for people at the top having skin in the game so to speak, but frankly that level is absurd.
Would love to see his package and reasons, although share price hasn't moved upwards since 12 months ago, I suspect this was set at year end when shares had increase from around £17 to £27 so I wonder if his incentive was based on share price movement which would make sense.
Shame it's a share bonus,
This is probably misleading. Persimmon is in the middle of a long-term process to return capital to shareholders by way of heavy duty dividends. With £1.25 per share paid out on 29 March and another £1.10 per share on 2 July. The share price will, of course reflect those diminutions of capital.
Disgusting.... No-one is worth that sort of money....their excuses for it are even worse.... Maybe they could use his wages to reduce the price of homes.
I thought he got a £110M bonus. At £47M he must be feeling the squeeze.
Think he agreed to give up half his shares.
I'm usually all for people at the top having skin in the game so to speak, but frankly that level is absurd.
Would love to see his package and reasons, although share price hasn't moved upwards since 12 months ago, I suspect this was set at year end when shares had increase from around £17 to £27 so I wonder if his incentive was based on share price movement which would make sense.
Comments
I'm usually all for people at the top having skin in the game so to speak, but frankly that level is absurd.
Would love to see his package and reasons, although share price hasn't moved upwards since 12 months ago, I suspect this was set at year end when shares had increase from around £17 to £27 so I wonder if his incentive was based on share price movement which would make sense.
Shame it's a share bonus,
You have to pay top wages and bonuses just to get them to do their job - the same logic doesn't apply to the rest of the workforce.
I doubt anyone else would be willing to do his job for such a pittance.
And I bet he didn't pay £21m in Income tax