Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Airstrikes against Syria

Confirmed reports the US, UK and France have hit targets in Syria.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43762251
«13456710

Comments

  • NapaAddick
    NapaAddick Posts: 4,657
    edited April 2018
    US used B-1 bombers. Wow. First time Trump has ever formed a coalition of any kind.
  • NapaAddick
    NapaAddick Posts: 4,657
    edited April 2018
    Stock markets closed for the weekend... nighttime. Figured it would be something like that.
  • bazjonster
    bazjonster Posts: 2,875
    edited April 2018
    Just watched Trump's address following the air strikes.

    Lots of praying that God does this, that and the other! Meanwhile, God and all of his/hers/its cohorts, in all of their guises, sit in their make believe heavenly utopia with their big fat cigars, laughing at all of the chaos that their respective religions incite to reap upon this world!

    God? Do me a favour please! What a complete and utter pile of pony!!

    And to be fair; I don't want to start any blasphemous rumours, but I think that god's got a sick sense of humour.
  • Just watched Trump's address following the air strikes.

    Lots of praying that God does this, that and the other! Meanwhile, God and all of his/hers/its cohorts, in all of their guises, sit in their make believe heavenly utopia with their big fat cigars, laughing at all of the chaos that their respective religions incite to reap upon this world!

    God? Do me a favour please! What a complete and utter pile of pony!!

    Don’t forget he’s not talking to you, he’s talking to the “American People” who are as insatiable for all that God shit the same way they are insatiable for stuffing vast amounts of deep fried shit down their necks every meal time.
  • bazjonster
    bazjonster Posts: 2,875

    Just watched Trump's address following the air strikes.

    Lots of praying that God does this, that and the other! Meanwhile, God and all of his/hers/its cohorts, in all of their guises, sit in their make believe heavenly utopia with their big fat cigars, laughing at all of the chaos that their respective religions incite to reap upon this world!

    God? Do me a favour please! What a complete and utter pile of pony!!

    Don’t forget he’s not talking to you, he’s talking to the “American People” who are as insatiable for all that God shit the same way they are insatiable for stuffing vast amounts of deep fried shit down their necks every meal time.
    Whilst stroking their assault rifles and reading their copy of the Second Amendment mate.
  • bazjonster
    bazjonster Posts: 2,875
    But he's a Superstar mate; I've seen the musical! :wink:
  • iaitch
    iaitch Posts: 10,224
    If the Americans spot him on their radar they'll probably blow him out the sky.
  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,051
    I can't help feeling that getting involved is a mistake. I mean, the images of children being subject to chemical weapons attack is heart rendering, but when have we ever had a successful outcome from attacking? Serious question. What is considered a successful outcome?

    I thought of Kosovo, but we were acting with NATO.

    Libya and Iraq? Possibly, ISIS have been largely defeated.
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,733
    McBobbin said:

    I can't help feeling that getting involved is a mistake. I mean, the images of children being subject to chemical weapons attack is heart rendering, but when have we ever had a successful outcome from attacking? Serious question. What is considered a successful outcome?

    I thought of Kosovo, but we were acting with NATO.

    Libya and Iraq? Possibly, ISIS have been largely defeated.

    There can be no successful outcome.
    I’m with you . This is a massive mistake . We shouldn’t be getting involved.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Shrew
    Shrew Posts: 5,749
    I wonder about the effect of blowing up a so called chemical weapon storage facility on the ground which is close to residential areas, does it not have the same effect as dropping chemical weapons ?
  • Good. It's about time we stood up to Assad and Putin. How much longer do you turn a blind eye to innocent people being slaughtered and gassed with Putin spinning his bollocks.

    If it escalates so be it, but you can't let the threat of escalation deter you from appeasing evil and it sets a precedent and free pass for future tyrants to commit attrocities. No other methods or solutions have worked and I'm pleased Britain has stood up to the bastards.


  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Shrew said:

    I wonder about the effect of blowing up a so called chemical weapon storage facility on the ground which is close to residential areas, does it not have the same effect as dropping chemical weapons ?

    This is why I'm a proponent of the Gaviscon bomb
  • clb74
    clb74 Posts: 10,824

    Good and people should stop being so scared of Russia and Putin

    Fuck Putin
    Fuck Assad

    Bomb the shit out of anyone using chemicals weapons on their people or our own

    I agree.
    If someone like china started doing it would we get involved with them.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280

    Good. It's about time we stood up to Assad and Putin. How much longer do you turn a blind eye to innocent people being slaughtered and gassed with Putin spinning his bollocks.

    If it escalates so be it, but you can't let the threat of escalation deter you from appeasing evil and it sets a precedent and free pass for future tyrants to commit attrocities. No other methods or solutions have worked and I'm pleased Britain has stood up to the bastards.


    Sounds like a good party trick.
  • Jayajosh
    Jayajosh Posts: 2,877
    edited April 2018

    McBobbin said:

    I can't help feeling that getting involved is a mistake. I mean, the images of children being subject to chemical weapons attack is heart rendering, but when have we ever had a successful outcome from attacking? Serious question. What is considered a successful outcome?

    I thought of Kosovo, but we were acting with NATO.

    Libya and Iraq? Possibly, ISIS have been largely defeated.

    There can be no successful outcome.
    I’m with you . This is a massive mistake . We shouldn’t be getting involved.
    I disagree, the Nazis would have taken over the entire planet had nobody stood up to such a horrific regime. The world should stand together against tyrants and use reasonable force as necessary. World Cup now looks doubtful given Russia’s stance that there will be consequences. Has there ever been world peace?
  • JohnBoyUK
    JohnBoyUK Posts: 9,017
    Jayajosh said:

    McBobbin said:

    I can't help feeling that getting involved is a mistake. I mean, the images of children being subject to chemical weapons attack is heart rendering, but when have we ever had a successful outcome from attacking? Serious question. What is considered a successful outcome?

    I thought of Kosovo, but we were acting with NATO.

    Libya and Iraq? Possibly, ISIS have been largely defeated.

    There can be no successful outcome.
    I’m with you . This is a massive mistake . We shouldn’t be getting involved.
    I disagree, the Nazis would have taken over the entire planet had nobody stood up to such a horrific regime. The world should stand together against tyrants and use reasonable force as necessary. World Cup now looks doubtful given Russia’s stance that there will consequences. Has there ever been world peace?
    Why is the World Cup doubtful?
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    JohnBoyUK said:

    Jayajosh said:

    McBobbin said:

    I can't help feeling that getting involved is a mistake. I mean, the images of children being subject to chemical weapons attack is heart rendering, but when have we ever had a successful outcome from attacking? Serious question. What is considered a successful outcome?

    I thought of Kosovo, but we were acting with NATO.

    Libya and Iraq? Possibly, ISIS have been largely defeated.

    There can be no successful outcome.
    I’m with you . This is a massive mistake . We shouldn’t be getting involved.
    I disagree, the Nazis would have taken over the entire planet had nobody stood up to such a horrific regime. The world should stand together against tyrants and use reasonable force as necessary. World Cup now looks doubtful given Russia’s stance that there will consequences. Has there ever been world peace?
    Why is the World Cup doubtful?
    http://forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/81606/russia-world-cup#latest
  • JohnBoyUK
    JohnBoyUK Posts: 9,017

    JohnBoyUK said:

    Jayajosh said:

    McBobbin said:

    I can't help feeling that getting involved is a mistake. I mean, the images of children being subject to chemical weapons attack is heart rendering, but when have we ever had a successful outcome from attacking? Serious question. What is considered a successful outcome?

    I thought of Kosovo, but we were acting with NATO.

    Libya and Iraq? Possibly, ISIS have been largely defeated.

    There can be no successful outcome.
    I’m with you . This is a massive mistake . We shouldn’t be getting involved.
    I disagree, the Nazis would have taken over the entire planet had nobody stood up to such a horrific regime. The world should stand together against tyrants and use reasonable force as necessary. World Cup now looks doubtful given Russia’s stance that there will consequences. Has there ever been world peace?
    Why is the World Cup doubtful?
    http://forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/81606/russia-world-cup#latest
    Ah ok, had somehow missed that thread!
  • Sponsored links:



  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    edited April 2018
    Big plays going on right now.

    Syria is a key strategic state for the Russians.
    It's home to some of their big military overseas bases. A key foothold in the Med and a potential diversion point for other states to build new fuel infrastructure into Europe hitting Russian exports hard.
    They won't give this up easily. Why they've lit a beacon over it by allowing the use of chemical weapons is anyone's guess?
    Putin has shown greater and greater hunger for unimaginable wealth in the past.
    Looks like he might be trying to make a play for world domination!
    World cup being cancelled could be the least of our worries.

    Then there's Trump!

    :-(
  • Extreme loss of face for the Russians here after all the rhetoric about how they were going to shoot down any missiles and hit platforms. Looks like they can’t or at best have been caught with their trousers round their ankles.

    I hope they decide to only retaliate verbally because anything else is definitely bad for us all.

    My opinion is that Putin will use this to whip up even further anti West feeling at home and smooth the way for him internally to find domestic support for his real ambitions which are to reclaim a buffer between Mother Russia and the West.

    Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia first on his list.
  • CharltonMadrid
    CharltonMadrid Posts: 5,091
    I can understand why the US and the UK are getting involved to distract from domestic problems but am surprised that France are doing so too. Surely the strikes will end up killing far more civilians so quite hard to see why they are doing it on moral grounds, but can also see that it would be wrong not to act against the use of chemical weapons. It's all very worrying though with the potential of drawing in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Israel as well as Russia. Calm heads are needed and that's exactly what we don't have with Trump and Putin.
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    edited April 2018
    Arms manufacturers will have a spring in their step this morning, and we plebs will be subject to the usual war porn.
  • Karim_myBagheri
    Karim_myBagheri Posts: 12,697

    Extreme loss of face for the Russians here after all the rhetoric about how they were going to shoot down any missiles and hit platforms. Looks like they can’t or at best have been caught with their trousers round their ankles.

    I hope they decide to only retaliate verbally because anything else is definitely bad for us all.

    My opinion is that Putin will use this to whip up even further anti West feeling at home and smooth the way for him internally to find domestic support for his real ambitions which are to reclaim a buffer between Mother Russia and the West.

    Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia first on his list.

    heard a conflicting report on this as some of the missiles were intercepted by Assad's Russian made/backed missile defence system.
  • EveshamAddick
    EveshamAddick Posts: 7,013
    Given that the Russians and Syrians have said the chemical weapons attack last week was somehow staged, any attack should have been held off until the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons has carried out its inspection, which is due to start today. Once their use last week was confirmed, then it is legitimate to take action.
  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,116

    I can understand why the US and the UK are getting involved to distract from domestic problems but am surprised that France are doing so too. Surely the strikes will end up killing far more civilians so quite hard to see why they are doing it on moral grounds, but can also see that it would be wrong not to act against the use of chemical weapons. It's all very worrying though with the potential of drawing in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Israel as well as Russia. Calm heads are needed and that's exactly what we don't have with Trump and Putin.

    Macron left himself very little choice, whilst on the campaign trail he made it clear if any state crossed the red line of using chemical weapons he would act, Syria used those weapons, he's acted. It shows he's a man of his word and good on him for doing so.
  • Shrew
    Shrew Posts: 5,749
    Jayajosh said:

    McBobbin said:

    I can't help feeling that getting involved is a mistake. I mean, the images of children being subject to chemical weapons attack is heart rendering, but when have we ever had a successful outcome from attacking? Serious question. What is considered a successful outcome?

    I thought of Kosovo, but we were acting with NATO.

    Libya and Iraq? Possibly, ISIS have been largely defeated.

    There can be no successful outcome.
    I’m with you . This is a massive mistake . We shouldn’t be getting involved.
    I disagree, the Nazis would have taken over the entire planet had nobody stood up to such a horrific regime. The world should stand together against tyrants and use reasonable force as necessary. World Cup now looks doubtful given Russia’s stance that there will be consequences. Has there ever been world peace?
    But a couple of years ago it was ISA that was the threat to the world and Syrian and Russian forces have pretty much seen them off, it really not as simple as you make out
  • Ridiculous action - no long term strategy. The bombing is utterly pointless if there is no long term plan.

    Only a moron would think this was a good idea.