Rumoured to have sacked Bilic tonight ( on motd) David Moyes rumoured to be taking over on Monday, they did look a shambles against Liverpool tonight, but in my opinion, have got some shocking players, particularly in the midfield area.
Edit please close, just seen the other thread!
1
Comments
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42898043
So much for African Cup of Nations being the reason...
But I reckon there is a better, more "diplomatic" way of saying that now
It is the very definition of racism.
They are saying we are not employing anyone else from a particular continent with a population of over 1 billion because we have decided that all of them "have a bad attitude" on the alleged behaviour of one or two players.
Di Canio pushed over a referee = all Italians attack refs so we're not buying any more.
Sweeping negative generalisations about a particular groups of people = racism.
And better watch Fosu and Kashi too if they get dropped.
Better stick to really committed "European" players like Watt and Holmes
if the club have given it go signing players from a particular continent and it has not worked out because "some" of the players have a bad attitude then they are within their rights to look elsewhere.
Not Racist
You also seem to have misread the 'some' part of SELR's post and have, instead, spelt it as being 'all'.
Big difference and probably why you have incorrectly concluded.
Nothing racist in that?
As soon as you go from the specific ("Some") to general ("limit the number") it is racist.
Tony Watt = bad attitude so lets "limit the number" of Scottish players.
Or maybe clubs could employ people based on their own abilities and own attitudes rather than assuming that because the last bloke from Scotland/Africa was bad then the next one might be.
Racist all day long which is why he's been suspended.
The assertion that players of a certain ethnic background possess character flaws in making their contribution to your organisation over and above those of other nationalities is racial profiling and discriminatory.
Any organisation is entitled to employ who they wish they cannot however discriminate against any individual on the basis of their sex, race, creed or religion in making such decision. Such discrimination is illegal.
The statement made as reported appears to discriminate against players from a certain ethnic background.
The stated recruitment process specifically excluded the consideration of a certain player or players, not based on any specific individual analysis but on a generic ethnic profile.
Wouldn’t have expected this from Thierry’s brother.
Our of 7 African players, WH have decided that "some" have a "bad attitude". Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that it is true that those players do have a bad attitude.
On the basis of somewhere between 2 and 6 African players, WH have decided that it will no longer employ any African players at all.
WH is assuming on the basis of a tiny sample size that there is a higher risk that African players will have a bad attitude than non-African players.
In other words African players are more likely to have a bad attitude than non-African players.
If that isn't racism, what on earth is it?