So we are wedded to a system with one up front? It is fortunate as we don't have many strikers. But if we bring a decent one in on loan, they will expect to play or at least their club will expect them to play so Magennis will be miffed and we might lose him next and he is out of contract next year. If we buy a striker we have about £300k -We had a striker, but we decided to let him leave without replacing him! We have loaned anothercouple to rivals. It seems that we are the best in the business at seeing and obstacle in the distance and not avoiding it.
Do you know what the best scoreline would be on Saturday? A nil- nil draw because if we score a few goals these idiots may actually believe we are adequately covered for the season. Mind you - nothing probably makes any difference with these planks.
3
Comments
After being 5-1 down at half time.
Morrison returned in 2015 and scores 1 every 3 games.
CAFC is the Bermuda triangle for strikers. (since SWP in League 1)
Novak who has under performed so far, should be capable of scoring
in League 1.
Ajose(out on loan) with this midfield should be capable of scoring 20 goals.
Big Josh could get 15 to 18 if he stays fit.
Why Can't CAFC sign a striker from the 4th or 5th tier who is hungry to play at a higher level without breaking the Belgian Bank ?
the final whistle heralding virtual silence from the 6000 baffled bewildered and brokenhearted Addicks
TBH with an at best half fit Magennis and FSG's one-eyed, one striker in the squad, one dimensional approach a one goal defeat is about the best we'd dare hope for anyway.
"But we beat BrizzleRovers" - yeah by one goal, they're shipping goals for fun everywhere else
"But we beat Exeter" - not with this squad we didn't
Happy Matchday one and all
I'm also sure, although you don't say so, that you weren't expecting Watt or Ajose to be the answer to our prayers?